Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ￴￴￴￴ ￴￴ ￴￴ Criminal 志 moment

Channel

￴￴￴￴ ￴￴ ￴￴ Criminal 志 moment

@criminalmoment9

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

52subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004446515168
TypeChannel
Username@criminalmoment9
DescriptionФлуд без бтс!!
First recorded7 November 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/criminalmoment9

Growth

527 Nov 2026, 19:47 — 52 subscribers7 Nov 2026, 20:22 — 52 subscribers7 Nov 2026, 19:477 Nov 2026, 20:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51–53 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 20:2252no change
7 Nov 2026, 19:4752first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.1%
avg views ÷ 52 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.5
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held15 (7 November 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total367
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
27
Videos
5
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC17 views2 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

. . . New union ウラル | ©. ガイスン You & mе

💘2

7 Nov 2026, 17:07 UTC19 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @TOXIC_FLOOD_0Photo

@ Всех Приветствую !!! -- Да, Я Вонен, Админ по Союзам, Ушла недавно с флуда, но прошел День и Я вернулась Снова !!! Меня встретили очень Мило, Как я Видела Скучали, Даже у Некоторых Могло Вызвать Злобное Мнение, Но я не буду Огорчаться и Тратить время На Них !! Я Буду Просто Тянуться дальше к Своим Мечтам, Помогать Всем Админам и Участникам, Чтобы Меня запомнили Как Хорошим Примером, Мои Союзы, Вы Снова Возращаетес…

7 Nov 2026, 17:06 UTC12 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @MilksisFloodGlowPhoto

🪦 ⌞ 𝗡ᧉ𝘄ֹ ᧉ𝗿ִ𐐼ִ ⌝ ִ ׄ & 09.11.26 ۫ ׅ 🤩 🤩🤍 ⋮ 𝝦ı๋𝗻𝗸ֹ ⊹ ࣪ ˖ 𝗚𝗿ִ𐐼ִ𝘆 🤩 💬 ➖➖ #𝗺᳢ֹ𝘀ֹ𝗿𝗽ֹ ➖꒰ 𝗌𐐫𐐫n . . ꒱ 🪦

7 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC14 viewsread 7 November 2026

У нас уже 50 пдп, оч быстро идет время канешна

7 Nov 2026, 16:43 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026

ЕТА ОЧ мила зайка 🥺🥺🥺

💘1

7 Nov 2026, 16:42 UTC13 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @otspotfloodPhoto

ㅤㅤ ㅤӃ⅌ᎯƜᏁИℭƬ я люблю все свои союзы, но эти чуточку больше <Зз♡ Ꮎ1˖ @womflu Ꮎ2˖ @Fuckingflood0 Ꮎ3˖ @Wiiishflood Ꮎ4˖ @yumilyfl Ꮎ5˖ @criminalmoment9 Ꮎ6˖ @AUTUMN_NIGHT_FLOOD Ꮎ7˖ @dorikitos порядок не имеет значения ㅤувидели себя – рп

7 Nov 2026, 16:39 UTC12 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @MilksisFloodGlowVideo

🤩 🗝𝒆𝒘 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕 🪽𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒐 🪽🌞 🎀 🗝 𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒂 🪽 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒔 🗝🗝🗝🗝𝒆𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒓 🪽 𝑺𝒐𝒎𝒊

7 Nov 2026, 16:26 UTC18 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @TOXIC_FLOOD_0

#Teetee у нас прошла чистка и я если честно разочарован Вот результаты чистки Баны: Ши ын Глент Тянь си вей Вонхи Джули Ван Минли Лим Хан Рим Феликс Джеймс Чиса Мэган Лиз Лара Ли Джун ен Сонхун Карина Варны: Бомгю #ᥴᤋρᥰ

7 Nov 2026, 16:26 UTC12 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @J1nxx_fldPhoto

пᴩиɯᴧᴀ чᥙᥴᴛκᥲ.. ᥙ я ᧐чᥱнь ᧐ᴦ᧐ρчᥱн.. ᥰ᧐ᴛ᧐ⲙу чᴛ᧐ у нᥲᥴ нᥱᴛу ᥲκᴛᥙʙ и ʍᴀᴧᴏ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ( БАН ᧘уᥙ джу᧘ᥙ чᥙκᥙᴛᥲ ɸᥱ᧘ᥙκᥴ ᥴынⲙᥙн ʙᥙнᴛᥱρ ᥊ёнджᥙн Ищᥱⲙ ᥲκᴛᥙʙныᥔ нью ᥙ ᥲдⲙᥙн᧐ʙ/ᥴ᧐юᤋ᧐ʙ Пᥙᥴᥲᴛь: @Yum1sx_0 #𝐣𝐢𝐧𝐱𝐱

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @criminalmoment9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“￴￴￴￴ ￴￴ ￴￴ Criminal 志 moment” (@criminalmoment9), 52 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/criminalmoment9.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.