Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Влюбленная в Крым

@crimeaphoto2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,004subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001531011924
TypeChannel
Username@crimeaphoto2
Created21 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crimeaphoto2

Growth

4,0044,0144,0096 August 2026 — 4,014 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,014 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,011 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,004 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,003–4,016 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:514,004-7
7 Aug 2026, 01:404,011-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:454,014no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:534,014first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.81%
avg views ÷ 4,004 subscribers
Avg views / post
153
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (11 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,831
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 31s
Average length
1m 15s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
450.0%
👍225.0%
🥰225.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC55 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anna_pro_gptVideo

Самый страшный вопрос, который появляется когда «всё нормально»

6 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC87 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anna_pro_gptPhoto

Кого мы не будем заманивать обещаниями лёгких денег Человека, который говорит: «Я вообще не хочу пользоваться продуктом. Скажите просто, как на этом заработать». Сразу нет. Потому что тогда вся система превращается в продажу возможности продажи возможности 🤪 Человек приглашает другого ради выплат. Тот приглашает третьего. А где в этой цепочке польза самому клиенту, уже никто особо не помнит. Так вот, партнёрская

4 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC110 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Почему правильная рекомендация может оказаться совершенно бесполезной?

4 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC102 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anna_pro_gptVideo

Новости за сегодня

4 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC108 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anna_pro_gptPhoto

Что будет, если превратить 30 вопросов по обучению в телевизионную игру? Мы проверили. 🎮 Теперь в режиме «Блиц» вам случайно выпадает одна из двух игр. Вы отвечаете на вопросы, а каждый правильный ответ постепенно открывает то, что спрятано. 🧩 В режиме «Пазл» после каждого верного ответа появляется новый фрагмент изображения. И чем меньше деталей остаётся закрытыми, тем сильнее хочется дойти до конца и увидеть карт

1

27 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC179 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anna_pro_gpt

До вебинара "ИИ в нестабильной ситуации: от хаоса к пошаговому плану " осталось: 1 день и 22 часа. 29.07 в 19:00 Регисирация: https://app.jetbot24.ru/w/caRo?utm_source=2907

24 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC235 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anna_pro_gpt

Друзья, небольшое изменение планов на 29 июля. В этот день я выступаю на площадке «Мой бизнес». Изначально я была уверена, что мероприятие открытое, поэтому многим из вас обещала приглашение. Но выяснилось, что попасть туда смогут только участники определённого конкурса. К сожалению, пригласить всех желающих я не смогу. При этом вечером, 29 июля в 19:00, у меня был запланирован отдельный вебинар только для участник

22 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC171 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anna_pro_gptVideo

Курс "НейроМастер" в самом разгаре! Интересно, что каждый день присоединяются новые студенты! Можно успеть присоединиться и нагнать до конца этой недели. НейроИнститут.РФ/neirointensive2

15 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC258 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anna_pro_gptVideo

Благодарю всех за поздравления! У меня как-будто вчера юбилей был. Такооое количество человек поздравили, я в шоке! Такого никогда не было 😍😍😍 Благодарю за теплые слова 🙏 Душа раскрылась и не закрывается 😍😍😍 И делюсь самыми яркими моментами вчерашнего дня 😍 Локация @izba_drakona

3🥰2👍1

15 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC187 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @anna_pro_gpt

Полное погружение в PINK FLAMINGO PARTY со всеми приколами и закулисьем в сториз @anna_gpt

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @crimeaphoto2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Влюбленная в Крым” (@crimeaphoto2), 4,004 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crimeaphoto2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.