Channel
@creature_soup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002326688158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @creature_soup |
| Description | Делаю игру в соло с нейронками, рассказываю о процессе Для связи: @Thornwood |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/creature_soup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 43 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 43 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 21 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
74 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 35.1% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 28.4% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 8.11% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 6.76% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 6.76% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 5.41% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Расскажу про один из моих проектов которые эдьютеймент/серьёзные игры. Это игра Корпоративные Легенды для погружения в методологию Stage Gate. Штука рабочая: люди на практике прощупывают принципы стейдж-гейта — воронку решений, отсев проектов на гейтах. И это лучше, чем послушать ещё одну лекцию (не заменяя конечно таковых). А ещё прикрутили забавный и юморной сеттинг для облегчения входа — такое офисное фэнтези, с …
🔥9❤5🥰3
А, последний раз-то я был на КРИ в 2006 году — страшно представить, 20 лет назад 😱 Тогда КРИ проводилась в гостинице Космос, была большая-разухабистая и все верили в будущее )) нашел даже какую-то фотку, почему-то в чб — я тут в "брендовой" футболке Psychosphere (большая история про энтузиазм, К-Д Лаб и много движа, обязательно как-нето напишу... в мемуарах 😁)
🤣4💔3💯2
Побывал на КРИ! Кто не знает - это Конференция Разработчиков Игр. Раньше она проходила ежегодно, в 2014 ушла из самостоятельного эвента в часть Игромира. И вот возродилась, проходила в Сколково. Это штука знаковая кмк для рф геймдева — путь его тернист и непрост, но люди что-то делают и мне кажется это хорошо. Срез по играм — небольшие в массе, много русскояза (Дети берёзы, Садко, Нейробаюн, etc). Даже мерч дали! 😄 …
❤5🔥4❤🔥3
Привет всем! Долго не писал сюда: выживание/работа + ощущение что «ну теперь надо точно что-то красивое/законченное показать». То есть Проводников, анимацию, планка качества высока! И это отодвигает постоянно для меня возможность делиться прогрессом. Неправильно, но как есть 🫣 А ещё... Я начал делать новую игру 🤪 Когда уже хочется что-то увидеть готовое, зарелизенное — такой вот соблазн за пару-тройку вечеров навайбк…
🔥6❤4🥰3
Signed ToR
🐟✨ Пока искал подступы к визуализации Проводников, держал в голове не только эстетику, но и специфику игры: вид сверху, всё должно хорошо читаться, и при этом — двигаться, жить, шевелиться. Статичная картинка не передаст ощущение «сотканного из света существа». Нужна анимация. Делать покадровую анимацию, даже с помощью NanoBanana — довольно муторно 😩 А если вносить изменения — то переделывать придётся довольно много…
⚡5❤3😍2🔥1
Signed ToR
Нарратив. Часть 3: Звёзды, Архетипы и цена пустоты ✨ Заключительная (пока что!) часть моих метаний вокруг сюжета. В прошлом лонгриде остановился на том, что отказался от ящиков с гвоздями в пользу душ, но застрял на том, как это всё красиво увязать и не передушнить. Мне очень близка тема света, поэтому я оставил центральную концепцию: порт — это Врата между мирами. Место перехода душ «оттуда» — «сюда». Но решил сме…
🔥6❤4❤🔥2
Signed ToR
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @creature_soup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 462,303 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Суп существ 👾” (@creature_soup), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/creature_soup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.