Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 24 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,332–1,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 23:37
1,338
-5
12 Sept 2026, 15:36
1,343
-4
8 Sept 2026, 21:18
1,347
-3
3 Sept 2026, 04:39
1,350
-10
31 Aug 2026, 06:13
1,360
-7
27 Aug 2026, 23:54
1,367
-5
24 Aug 2026, 17:26
1,372
-5
23 Aug 2026, 04:46
1,377
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 1,338 subscribers
Avg views / post
306
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
20 (4 April 2026 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
306
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
56s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
632 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
209
33.1%
🔥
160
25.3%
custom 5357579953497983889
80
12.7%
👍
31
4.91%
custom 5415801920277200280
27
4.27%
🤯
27
4.27%
custom 5355014749920709843
26
4.11%
🎉
13
2.06%
👏
13
2.06%
custom 5206601132805212480
12
1.90%
custom 5404614939220391123
10
1.58%
custom 5404870433939922908
10
1.58%
custom 5471883477219549006
5
0.791%
🤔
5
0.791%
custom 5215506210622554221
2
0.316%
custom 5370806945236130133
2
0.316%
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 632 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crazythings. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 April 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мы с командой последние пару месяцев так увлеченно строим лучший в мире ВПН, что я совсем забыл про существование этого канала 🫠
На iOS у нас уже 38000 юзеров и продолжаем расти по +500-1000 юзеров в день. Сегодня выпустили Android версию, которая уже доступна в гугл плее:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.brokenvpn.android
Всем кто хочет потестить Android и готов делиться обратной связью/багами я в…
Кирилл попробовалл современный балет!
Если вы ожидаете увидеть, как я танцую балет, вынужден разочаровать — этого видео тут не будет. К счастью для вас 😀
В эти выходные был в Palais Garnier на постановке Vibrations — это то, что называют современным балетом. Сам термин «современный балет» был мне не знаком, и настроен я был крайне скептически. Что может быть лучше балета в Питере в Мариинке или Михайловском?
Если …
🤯 Ощутил на себе как Илон Маск радикально меняет мир.
Не удивительно, что он — первый в мире триллионер
Все привыкли что полет на самолете — это время отдыха от интернета. Спутниковый интернет, конечно, бывает у некоторых авиакомпаний, но он очень медленный, глючный и дорогой.
Прямо сейчас я лечу на одному из первых самолетов Airbus A380 от Emirates оборудованном Starlink. Интернет бесплатный и быстрее чем у меня д…
Не перестаю восхищаться тем, какой крутой продукт мы сделали.
BrokenVPN отлично работает не только в России, но также и в Иране, где блокировки куда более продвинутые. И даже в Китае, который считается эталоном интернет-цензуры.
Наше приложение пробивает великий китайский файрволл (GFW) буквально за 4 секунды и выдает скорость до 50мбит на вип тарифе 🤯👏🏾
Почему НЕ стоит брать одно и то же блюдо в любимом ресторане? Оказывается, на это есть формула, и вывел её нобелевский лауреат
У меня есть давняя проблема. Стоит мне найти в ресторане одно идеальное блюдо — всё, другие я больше не пробую. Захожу и заказываю его снова и снова, потому что вдруг новое окажется хуже и тогда вечер будет испорчен.
Оказалось, над этой же дилеммой в 70-х думал известный физик Ричард Фейнма…
Утренний кофе натощак повышает сахар в крови сильнее, чем шоколадный круассан 🥐
Полгода ходил с глюкозным realtime датчиком (CGM). Самое неожиданное открытие как ни странно не про еду, а про напиток...
Кофе натощак подбрасывал мой сахар на 30mg/dL (выше нормы). Сильнее, чем круассан с шоколадом, съеденный после завтрака
Почему так:
— Утром у тебя пик кортизола, который и так поднимает сахар
— Кофеин сверху усилива…
Дорогие подписчики, если вам интересная вакансия Marketing Assistant, работа над международным продуктом и вы хорошо владеете английским языком, подробности тут 👉 https://telegra.ph/Vakansiya-marketing-assistant-05-26
Если знаете кого-то кому подходит эта вакансия, перешлите ему эту ссылку
⚠️Что делать с digital зависимостями
Инстаграм, тикток, вк и др. соцсети оптимизируют короткую дофаминовую петлю, вызывая у вас зависимость
Сила воли тут не работает. Лучше сразу признать свою уязвимость перед алгоритмами и применять лайфхаки, чтобы это минимизировать
Мой топ от самого лёгкого к самому радикальному
1) Отключить все уведомления
Push-notifications, badges, звук. Для меня это база уже лет 5, и я не …
Это гениально!
Нажал по привычке иконку инсты -> пауза на 10 секунд («сделай вдох-выдох») и спрашивает действительно ты хотел туда зайти.
И этих 10 сек достаточно чтобы передумать!
Как часто и от чего вы ловите состояние потока?
Для кого-то это игра на инструменте, программирование, рисование, танцы, вождение, видео игры.
Поделитесь в комментариях что вызывает у вас состояние потока. Можете ли вы это контролировать или это само либо случается либо нет?
Я сейчас исследую это состояние с помощью ЭЭГ монитора, который по активности тета и бета волн может зафиксировать переход в это состояние и …
Longevity: 7 реально доказанных способов продлить жизнь
Многие советы в рилсах и каналах биохакеров, увы, не имеют доказательной базы. Собрал для вас памятку с тем, что на сегодняшний день реально доказано наукой.
1. Социальные связи
Одиночество повышает риск ранней смерти на 26%, социальная изоляция — на 29%. По силе эффекта сопоставимо с выкуриванием 15 сигарет в день.
Важно не столько количество близких отношени…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crazythings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кирилл разобрался” (@crazythings), 1,338 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crazythings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
