Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CRYPTO BLONDE

Channel

CRYPTO BLONDE

@cr_pt_new

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

4,678subscribers

-136 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002351601232
TypeChannel
Username@cr_pt_new
Created21 January 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cr_pt_new

Growth

4,6784,8144,7467 August 2026 — 4,814 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,814 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,809 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,791 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,775 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,758 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,751 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,735 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,726 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,713 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,699 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,678 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 31 days, net -136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,658–4,834 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 14:564,678-21
2 Sept 2026, 22:174,699-14
31 Aug 2026, 06:234,713-13
28 Aug 2026, 00:054,726-9
25 Aug 2026, 02:274,735-16
21 Aug 2026, 18:294,751-7
18 Aug 2026, 10:344,758-17
15 Aug 2026, 17:294,775-16
11 Aug 2026, 18:574,791-18
8 Aug 2026, 12:444,809-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:464,814no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:394,814first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 21 January 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍457.1%
🔥228.6%
👏114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2025 to 27 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Dec 2025, 16:01 UTC147 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Stablecoin circulating supply has increased by $16.97B since the start of 2025, rising from $194.2B to $211.2B. However, the pace of growth has varied, with a slowdown in early 2025 before picking up again in February. Throughout November and December, stablecoins were growing by ~$450M per day. In January, the rate declined to ~$400M per day, but February has seen a rebound, with $541M per day. This suggests renewe

24 Dec 2025, 17:32 UTC118 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Indeed. Let's see if there's any bounces The 71,000 to 73,000 range remains a key support level

11 Dec 2025, 16:00 UTC117 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Bitcoin's move played out exactly as expected. It broke out of the wedge, got rejected at the $100,000 level, and has now retraced to the dynamic support line, which was previously the wedge's resistance. We need to wait for further consolidation.

7 Dec 2025, 17:31 UTC119 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$ETH consolidation is similar to the $BTC consolidation phase in 2023 Study it

5 Dec 2025, 18:09 UTC132 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Hi everyone, Mary here 👋 I’m 26, and I’ve been building my life around crypto for the last 5+ years. I entered the market around the 2020 crash - right before one of the biggest bull runs in crypto. I had to learn fast, make plenty of mistakes, and slowly develop my own strategy that changed everything for me: my income, my lifestyle, and most importantly — THE FREEDOM I couldn’t even imagine before. 👉 So today I w

👍4🔥2👏1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @cr_pt_new. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CRYPTO BLONDE” (@cr_pt_new), 4,678 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cr_pt_new.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.