😁 精彩视频 尽在天上人间 😁 你感兴趣的这里都有 #乱伦 #AV #破处 #欧美 #暗网 💎: https://8859c.cc 🕹 扫码或复制链接到浏览器打开

Channel
🏆重庆-认证榜🏆
@cqrzb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
10,726subscribers
+126 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002058835421 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cqrzb |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cqrzb |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:17 | 10,726 | +32 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:19 | 10,694 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:50 | 10,697 | -9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:59 | 10,706 | +16 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:27 | 10,690 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:08 | 10,696 | +7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:40 | 10,689 | +12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:51 | 10,677 | +3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:28 | 10,674 | +12 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:31 | 10,662 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 10,670 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:35 | 10,679 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:41 | 10,677 | +10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:16 | 10,667 | +8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:45 | 10,659 | +32 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 10,627 | -4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 10,631 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:30 | 10,632 | +15 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:01 | 10,617 | -13 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 10,630 | first reading |
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 7 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.25%
- avg views ÷ 10,726 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 134
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.102%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (7 September 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,539 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 23:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🥕 找资源,认准「萝卜搜索」AI 神器! 🔍重新定义 Telegram 搜索体验 告别乱码与无效信息,AI 智能推荐更懂你的喜好。 🚀 全网首发: 全新 AI 智能推荐,精准定位你要关键词。 💰 边用边赚: 邀请好友即享现金奖励 🎁 限时福利: 绑定群组联系客服,免费领黄金广告位! 点击开启搜索新世界 👉 t.me/Robosearchbot
【老师艺名】茜茜 【胸器罩杯】B 【联系方式】 @xixi5ya 【所在位置】南坪 【验证留名】知秋🍂 【验证时间】11.04 【修车费用】600 【颜值身材】1.62这样,不胖不瘦, 【服务内容】洗吹做🐍 【服务态度】情绪价值到位,态度好小妹妹 【推荐程度】🌟🌟🌟🌟(1-2-3-4-5个星级) 【体验细节】今天轮休,存了几天货想找个小姐姐约一下,刚好在群里看见茜茜老师,到了老师上课的地方,遥控上楼,见到老师第一面,人照合一,皮肤细腻,御姐范儿的韵味让人欲罢不能。跟老师一起陪浴,陪浴时情不自禁跟老师行男女之欢之事,配合着绵绵的水声和温暖的水温,差点就交待在浴室里。 在浴室里跟老师激情一番后,随后跟老师一起来到床上,因为是服务系老师,AB面服务自然不会少,老师也是条大蟒🐍,口活水平太厉害,情绪价值给的很高,说真的,很多时候就想射出来了。 最后将老师翻过来,拥抱着,亲吻着,抚摸着彼此,老师叫声让我特别有感觉,戴上套套后,在老师的一声…
🥕 找资源,认准「萝卜搜索」AI 神器! 🔍重新定义 Telegram 搜索体验 告别乱码与无效信息,AI 智能推荐更懂你的喜好。 🚀 全网首发: 全新 AI 智能推荐,精准定位你要关键词。 💰 边用边赚: 邀请好友即享现金奖励 🎁 限时福利: 绑定群组联系客服,免费领黄金广告位! 点击开启搜索新世界 👉 t.me/Robosearchbot
😁 精彩视频 尽在天上人间 😁 你感兴趣的这里都有 #乱伦 #AV #破处 #欧美 #暗网 💎: https://8859c.cc 🕹 扫码或复制链接到浏览器打开
TG必备搜索引擎,新必搜 xbso 🔍 中文搜索 @xbso1 轻松帮您找到有趣的群、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻。 👇👇点击下方按钮,快速搜索👇👇
📊 0条车评,综合评分 好评 0% |人照 |服务 中评 0% |颜值 |态度 差评 0% |身材 |环境 花名 : #爆乳米粒 课费 :600/P 1200PP 资料:19 172cm 64kg 🐻36e 频道: https://t.me/baorumini 联系方式: @rubaomili👅 双向联系: @baoruminibot 位置 : #渝北嘉州 服务内容 喊爸爸 叫老公 巨乳压顶 69 接吻💋 无套吹 高潮会喷💦 闷骚 反差 水多多💦 调情 👅舔胸 👅蛋蛋 激情爱爱❤️ 欢迎哥哥试驾💋
🥕 找资源,认准「萝卜搜索」AI 神器! 🔍重新定义 Telegram 搜索体验 告别乱码与无效信息,AI 智能推荐更懂你的喜好。 🚀 全网首发: 全新 AI 智能推荐,精准定位你要关键词。 💰 边用边赚: 邀请好友即享现金奖励 🎁 限时福利: 绑定群组联系客服,免费领黄金广告位! 点击开启搜索新世界 👉 t.me/Robosearchbot
🥕 找资源,认准「萝卜搜索」AI 神器! 🔍重新定义 Telegram 搜索体验 告别乱码与无效信息,AI 智能推荐更懂你的喜好。 🚀 全网首发: 全新 AI 智能推荐,精准定位你要关键词。 💰 边用边赚: 邀请好友即享现金奖励 🎁 限时福利: 绑定群组联系客服,免费领黄金广告位! 点击开启搜索新世界 👉 t.me/Robosearchbot
😁 精彩视频 尽在天上人间 😁 你感兴趣的这里都有 #乱伦 #AV #破处 #欧美 #暗网 💎: https://8859c.cc 🕹 扫码或复制链接到浏览器打开
💃艺名:依依 ✈️资料:https://t.me/yexpy ⛳️位置: #南坪 🎁课费:600p 🙍♂️学生:神王宙斯 ———————————————— 去之前问了一下,是否有瑜伽裤紧身裤之类,回答说有的。那就行。风驰电掣抵达战场,门开着。果然如事先约定这般,穿着一条黑灰色贴身瑜伽裤,上身则是紧身运动衣。宛似刚散步回来的样子。赶紧拥抱一下,咸猪手从后背直接下探到达圆臀处,摸了一把。然后分开,我把上身往后,端详她的脸蛋,有点披肩的头发,脸蛋并没有瑕疵,眼圈旁抹了腮红一般的妆,明显是个会化妆的。带出一股干净利落的御姐风。 接着坐了下来,聊了几句之后,我就如同大宝剑祖师爷乔杉一样,直接脱了衣服。甩到了沙发上去洗澡了,洗完进了房间之后,指着柜子里的衣架,说哥哥你选一套吧。我翻了半天,摘了一套红色镂空的开档情趣内衣。递了给她,她就说去换衣服,叫我等一会儿。我说我也跑不了啊。然后就躺床上怀着激动的心情,心里开始数羊。 …
💃芳名:安安 ✈️直连:@sqanan ⏰日期:2026-11-03 👔男神:莫问 颜值:9 | 身材:9 | 服务:9 |态度:9 —————————————— 到了地方公寓的环境很不错,看得出来老师是个爱干净的,第一眼老师穿着白色的蕾丝睡裙,真的有那么一瞬间的恍惚让我想起了一位已经休息了快一年的人!!随即拿水闲聊,闲聊期间还无意间坐到你的腿上,好会啊~ 随即冲水洗漱,服务课表有的都可以,但是老涩批必须反向服务一下,69无异味的,一套流程下来就开始带t,女上起手紧度还不错,我还比较享受全自动他就把我拉起来做火车便当,水巨多,做的时候水声噗呲噗呲的,滑润无比,我也是超长发挥了做爱做到走路都要飘了,总体来说好评御姐风,瘦瘦的但是屁股摸着还有肉不骨感,好老师一个!
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @cqrzb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @cqrzb as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 27 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 4
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🏆重庆-认证榜🏆” (@cqrzb), 10,726 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cqrzb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.