Posted without readable text

Channel
Записки CPU designer'a
@cpu_design
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,553subscribers
+86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001130658852 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cpu_design |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cpu_design |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 3,553 | +16 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 3,537 | +19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 3,518 | +21 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:35 | 3,497 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 3,491 | +9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 3,482 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 3,485 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 3,480 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 3,483 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 3,476 | +6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 3,470 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 3,461 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 3,466 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 3,467 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 3,467 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
706 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5379652232813750191 | 198 | 28.0% | |
| 🔥 | 189 | 26.8% | |
| 😁 | 153 | 21.7% | |
| 👍 | 91 | 12.9% | |
| ✍ | 40 | 5.67% | |
| 👀 | 34 | 4.82% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.142% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Последнее время все чаще задумываюсь о том, как меняется наш workflow в RTL-дизайне и верификации. Микроэлектроника всегда была довольно консервативной отраслью. Да и бесконечные разговоры о том, заменит ли ИИ инженеров, на мой взгляд, не несут большой практической ценности. Гораздо интереснее обсуждать не прогнозы, а то, что уже происходит прямо сейчас: какие инструменты появляются и как они меняют нашу ежедневную …
👍11✍2custom 53796522328137501911
Токенмаксинг? Одобряем 😱
> we have invented a version of curl | bash that costs $5 every time you run it
😁24👍5👀2
Slang продолжает развиваться. В проекте появился новый инструмент - slang-netlist. Теперь можно построить структурный граф непосредственно из RTL на SystemVerilog, без работы с инструментами синтеза. Это открывает возможность проще анализировать дизайн еще на раннем этапе разработки. Что уже умеет slang-netlist: Bit-level resolution of data dependencies across continuous and procedural assignments. Procedural flo…
🔥15custom 537965223281375019112👀3👍1
На фото старая форма FC Barcelona с рекламой от компании Intel. А эта новость из испанского Forbes - ACS усиливает инвестиции в полупроводниковую отрасль, планируя приобрести 51% OpenChip в рамках раунда финансирования объемом 250 млн евро. Казалось бы причем тут футбол? Связь очень простая: председатель ACS - это Флорентино Перес, и он же является президентом футбольного клуба «Реал Мадрид». Осталось узнать, кто…
😁14custom 53796522328137501917👍1🔥1
Что там по зарплатам? Будут расти?
- Да, конечно. Сразу после того, как AI начнет сам согласовывать бюджеты45%
- И так уже выросли Возможность работать с передовыми AI инструментами это альтернативная компенсация26%
- Это все конечно здорово, а можно посты писать чаще чем раз в 2 месяца?59%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Был на конференции одного из Big 3 EDA-вендоров. Наверное, стоило посчитать, сколько раз со сцены прозвучало слово AI, но я быстро понял, что собьюсь. В целом продуктовые конференции всегда были про одно и то же: почему вам нужно купить еще одно расширение, новую фичу или новый инструмент. Но с приходом AI акцент заметно сместился. Теперь вендор продаёт не просто инструмент - он продаёт LLM-агента с набором скилло…
custom 537965223281375019119😁11🔥10👍6
Классный и актуальный доклад, рекомендую к просмотру 👀
👀3🔥2👍1
Мечтают ли ИИ-агенты об анализе вейвформ? Мероприятие прошло. Было очень круто 🎧 Спасибо всем кто пришел, и с кем удалось пообщаться! Если вдруг упустили, то я рассказывал про CLI инструмент для анализа и работы с вейвформами, написанный специально для "рук" LLM-агентов. https://github.com/kleverhq/wavepeek Слайды в первом коменте к посту, ну а выступление есть на YouTube Жажду получить любую обратную связь, осо…
🔥10custom 53796522328137501917👍3👀2
Исходники за 10 лет работы и $200 миллионов инвестиций в открытом доступе Помните стартап Esperanto, который разрабатывал чип с 1000+ RISC-V ядрами в составе сложной manycore системы и в итоге обанкротился? Стартап Ainekko, как и обещал, после приобретения прав на интеллектуальную собственность Esperanto Technologies открыл исходный код и микроархитектурную документацию на часть их разработок. Более подробно о виде…
custom 537965223281375019135👍31🔥16👀5✍3🎉1
Более 35 лет Arm продавала архитектурные лицензии и IP. Теперь произошло то, что все давно ждали и предсказывали: впервые за всю свою историю Arm выпускает собственный серверный чип - AGI CPU на базе 136 ядер Neoverse V3 (TSMC 3 nm). И это не слайды и не анонс на уровне RTL прототипа: тейпаут уже состоялся и чип прошел внутреннюю валидацию. Однако название AGI CPU - чистый маркетинг и кликбейт. Ядра Neoverse V3 c в…
custom 537965223281375019125🔥8😁4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cpu_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что там по зарплатам? Будут расти?
- Да, конечно. Сразу после того, как AI начнет сам согласовывать бюджеты45%
- И так уже выросли Возможность работать с передовыми AI инструментами это альтернативная компенсация26%
- Это все конечно здорово, а можно посты писать чаще чем раз в 2 месяца?59%
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Записки CPU designer'a” (@cpu_design), 3,553 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cpu_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.