Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Библиотека задач по C++ | тесты, код, задания

Channel

Библиотека задач по C++ | тесты, код, задания

@cpp_problems_lib

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,448subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001940255915
TypeChannel
Username@cpp_problems_lib
Created3 August 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cpp_problems_lib

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,4485,4715,459.56 August 2026 — 5,470 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,471 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,464 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,463 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,458 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,465 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,461 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,459 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,458 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,452 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,453 subscribers6 September 2026 — 5,458 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,455 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,458 subscribers26 September 2026 — 5,448 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 51 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,445–5,474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 07:395,448-10
15 Sept 2026, 12:395,458+3
11 Sept 2026, 14:175,455-3
6 Sept 2026, 22:195,458+5
2 Sept 2026, 13:185,453+1
30 Aug 2026, 10:075,452-6
27 Aug 2026, 10:425,458-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:485,459-2
21 Aug 2026, 04:145,461-4
18 Aug 2026, 09:035,465+7
15 Aug 2026, 18:585,458-5
12 Aug 2026, 18:165,463-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:115,464-7
7 Aug 2026, 02:515,471+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:315,470first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥱240.0%
❤120.0%
👍120.0%
👾120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC349 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Что выведет код?

  1. 2 2 226%
  2. 2 2 149%
  3. 1 2 316%
  4. 59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC220 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @proglib_academyPhoto

👅 Самое сложное — выбрать не курс, а направление Сегодня хочется разобраться в AI-агентах. Через пару недель появляется задача, где нужны алгоритмы. Потом понимаешь, что неплохо бы освежить Python или математику для Data Science. 🔜 Именно поэтому подписка на обучение многим оказывается удобнее отдельных курсов. Можно спокойно переключаться между темами, когда меняются задачи, а не покупать новую программу каждый ра…

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC318 viewsread 12 August 2026

Покупать новый курс каждый раз, когда меняется рабочая задача, — довольно странная механика. Нашли альтернативу 👇

4 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC358 viewsread 12 August 2026

🍴 Исследовательская задача: что именно изменил C++23 В C++23 приняли P2718R0 — и старый баг range-for тихо исчез. Но не для всех временных объектов и не безусловно. std::vector<int> getData() { return {1, 2, 3}; } for (int x : getData() // временный 1 | filtered) // вью поверх него std::cout << x; ✏️Задание (research): найди в документации/предложении ответы: 1️⃣ Жизнь каких и…

31 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC398 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @proglib_academyPhoto

🎯 У разработчика, DevOps-инженера и техлида разные причины задуматься о системной работе с AI-агентами Но цель одна: перейти от случайных удачных запусков к управляемому процессу на реальном проекте — с понятными правилами, ревью, контролем расходов и безопасности ✔️ На курсе «ИИ для разработчиков» участники выстраивают такой процесс на практике: подключают инструменты, задают границы для агента и учатся понимать,…

31 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC432 viewsread 12 August 2026

Разработчик, DevOps-инженер или техлид — у каждого своя причина навести порядок в работе с AI-агентами. Разбираем, чем отличаются их задачи 😊

29 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC526 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Сколько элементов окажется в v?

  1. Три элемента, все со значением пять21%
  2. Пять элементов, все со значением три4%
  3. Два элемента со значениями три и пять72%
  4. Один элемент со значением тридцать пять0%
  5. Ноль элементов: это вызов конструктора размера3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC324 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @proglib_academyPhoto

У вас в проекте есть файл вроде utils_v2_final_FIX.py, который все боятся трогать ❓ Что делаете с таким легаси? ❤️ Не трогаю: работает — и ладно 👍 Переписываю с нуля и надеюсь на лучшее 🔥 Сначала покрываю тестами, потом рефакторю по частям 👾 У нас такого нет — честно-честно На курсе «ИИ для разработчиков» разберём третий подход: как с помощью агента зафиксировать текущее поведение легаси-кода тестами, а затем меня…

👾1

28 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC435 viewsread 12 August 2026

Самый страшный файл в проекте — тот, который «работает, не трогай» 😊

27 Jul 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,910 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Сколько итераций у цикла?

  1. 516%
  2. 230%
  3. 320%
  4. 426%
  5. 107%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cpp_problems_lib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz77 voters

Что выведет код?

  1. 2 2 226%
  2. 2 2 149%
  3. 1 2 316%
  4. 59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz147 voters

Сколько элементов окажется в v?

  1. Три элемента, все со значением пять21%
  2. Пять элементов, все со значением три4%
  3. Два элемента со значениями три и пять72%
  4. Один элемент со значением тридцать пять0%
  5. Ноль элементов: это вызов конструктора размера3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jul 2026, 11:49 UTCAnonymous Quiz371 voters

Сколько итераций у цикла?

  1. 516%
  2. 230%
  3. 320%
  4. 426%
  5. 107%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz91 voters

Что выведет программа (С++23)?

  1. 1 155%
  2. 4 411%
  3. 1 423%
  4. 4 15%
  5. Compilation error5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTCAnonymous Quiz407 voters

Что такое loop unrolling (развёртывание цикла)?

  1. Полное удаление цикла и замена его вызовом функции22%
  2. Перенос всех вычислений цикла в отдельный поток7%
  3. Автоматическое кэширование результатов каждой итерации7%
  4. Дублирование тела цикла ради уменьшения накладных расходов54%
  5. Замена цикла рекурсией для лучшей читаемости кода11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Учебные фильмы 🎞
@maths_lib · 25,423
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 September 2026
Библиотека программиста
@proglibrary · 78,288
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Библиотека задач по C++ | тесты, код, задания” (@cpp_problems_lib), 5,448 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cpp_problems_lib.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.