Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for coup de foudre

Channel

coup de foudre

@coupdefoudreu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

187subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002350340953
TypeChannel
Username@coupdefoudreu
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/coupdefoudreu

Growth

1831871858 August 2026 — 183 subscribers8 August 2026 — 183 subscribers8 August 2026 — 184 subscribers15 August 2026 — 187 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 182–188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:13187+3
8 Aug 2026, 15:08184+1
8 Aug 2026, 12:31183no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:18183first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
137.7%
avg views ÷ 187 subscribers
Avg views / post
257
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held14 (24 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total3,604
Reactions total845
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

845 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 546978599987579754123627.9%
custom 534395374025471353321925.9%
custom 530985583168301165021024.9%
custom 531227732994952509518021.3%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 845reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 14 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coupdefoudreu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC31 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

какое же наслаждение сделать лёгкую растяжку после тяжёлых тренировок предыдущих дней, потом умыться и просто сидеть у распахнутого окна, чувствуя прохладный ветерок

custom 53439537402547135336custom 53122773299495250955custom 54697859998757975414custom 53098558316830116503

5 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC89 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026

на самом деле так хочу вас поблагодарить за ваше внимание к моему каналу! я искренне рада, что вам откликаются мои посты, атмосфера этого места, всё это очень-очень ценно для меня. вы всегда пишите такие приятные слова, которые позволяют мне дальше двигаться на этом потоке любви, даже когда совсем опускаются руки. спасибо, что вы здесь! давайте и дальше вместе будем оставаться друг для друга уютным местом тепла и ком

custom 546978599987579754124custom 534395374025471353319custom 530985583168301165018custom 531227732994952509514

4 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC352 views92 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

your future self is proud that you never stopped trying 未来

custom 546978599987579754126custom 530985583168301165025custom 531227732994952509523custom 534395374025471353318

1 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC188 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026

как же мне не хватало таких спокойных дней, когда можно просто наслаждаться пасмурным небом, дождём, вместе с этим готовить блинчики с яблоком и корицей, и ощущать абсолютную лёгкость мыслей

custom 546978599987579754119custom 534395374025471353317custom 531227732994952509515custom 530985583168301165012

31 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC181 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026

летний вечер, карамельный капучино, долгая пешая прогулка с любимками, свежий воздух и красивейший закат сделали мой день абсолютно прекрасным. именно такие простые, на первый взгляд, вещи создают уютные, дорогие сердцу воспоминания, которые будут согревать даже в самый холодный вечер беспощадной зимы. это так приятно осознавать!

custom 546978599987579754120custom 530985583168301165017custom 534395374025471353314custom 531227732994952509513

31 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC247 views68 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

today's moodboard ᯓᡣ𐭩 ݁ ˖Ი𐑼⋆

custom 534395374025471353321custom 546978599987579754120custom 530985583168301165016custom 531227732994952509511

29 Jul 2026, 18:44 UTC242 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026

˖ ݁♬⋆.˚𝄞 cr. песни, с которыми я хочу, чтобы меня ассоциировали: my love mine all mine - mitski not cute anymore - illit peach eyes - wave to earth lunch - billie eilish asap - new jeans heavy serenade - nmixx youtiful - stray kids dim - yves ぴぽぴぽ (pipo pipo) - serani poji 雨降る夜の向こう (ame furu yoru no mukou) - lamp

custom 546978599987579754120custom 531227732994952509516custom 534395374025471353315custom 530985583168301165013

28 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC502 views94 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

whatever you do, do it from the bottom of your heart 心と魂

custom 534395374025471353326custom 530985583168301165024custom 531227732994952509523custom 546978599987579754121

27 Jul 2026, 05:08 UTC259 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026

association подберу вам персонажа из haikyuu, брелок и маникюр под ваш вайб для участия оставьте свой юз/тгк и сделайте рп моей анкеты или последнего поста 10/10 + 2 доп, стоп!

custom 534395374025471353314custom 530985583168301165012custom 546978599987579754112custom 531227732994952509511

26 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC240 views77 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

как же я люблю свой пинтерест :((( моя терапия

custom 534395374025471353323custom 546978599987579754122custom 530985583168301165021custom 531227732994952509511

26 Jul 2026, 03:42 UTC291 views51 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

и давно поймала себя на мысли, что очень люблю раннее утро и поздний вечер. именно в такие часы кажется, что всё вокруг как-то замедляется, успокаивается, и вместе с этим чувствуется лёгкость на душе. позволяешь себе наконец выдохнуть, а тревожные мысли будто сами покидают голову

custom 530985583168301165016custom 531227732994952509515custom 546978599987579754112custom 53439537402547135338

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @coupdefoudreu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,731 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“coup de foudre” (@coupdefoudreu), 187 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coupdefoudreu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.