Channel
@cosmos_airdropsy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001706856314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cosmos_airdropsy |
| Description | Leaking Cosmos $ATOM ecosystem airdrops and stakedrops. My power is $ATOM ⚛️ Everyone likes airdrops 🪂 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cosmos_airdropsy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 6 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 6 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Seems like there is a lot of hype and excitement but everyone should be ready for an airdrop at a later date, with vesting, etc. Again: no official info! Per Discord: https://t.co/5iyvx10DQG we are likely to hear about the airdrop prior to TGE or 12 PM UTC on August 15th. 2/ https://t.co/qIe3hLuotB
Full link to the @SeiNetwork AMA with @bsc_daily: https://t.co/agykABaqhO check: 35:40 and 56:20 3/
@azimuthph @bsc_daily Given the hype (real and imagined) around $SEI and overall Discord over reliance would not be surprised. DYOR and DO NOT FOMO.
$SEI mainnet and airdrop expectations: ➡️Sei has not announced timing or eligibility criteria ➡️ $SEI AMA on @bsc_daily: "could be tomorrow, could be one day after that..." ➡️Discord: "The announcement of the airdrop will be made before TGE" TGE Aug 15th What do you think? 1/ https://t.co/hwren9VpuB
@seppwurscht @Neutron_org @0xSpaydh @hxrts US geo-block is a great idea! 🤔 (sorry, I just couldn't resist)
@AlexCosmonaut Yeah but I think (I hope?) most can juggle _two_ thoughts in their heads at the same time: 1. continue to call out bullshit 2. continue to build
@AlexCosmonaut 🫡
$STARS 🚀 Why? 👀 https://t.co/sAf6noPeMj
#NFT Utility https://t.co/NhzxUrKDG3
@JLiBercry Legend!
🔁 RT @DinoFriends_io: 🦖 Dino Friends Alert! 🦕 The SNAPSHOT is happening this week! This is your last chance to acquire our #NFT and qualify for the upcoming airdrop 🪂 Don't miss out! 🌍💚 https://t.co/hTlU9O9EnB
What is your average price at which you bought $ATOM? My 7-8$ long time ago 😅
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cosmos_airdropsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cosmos_airdropsy named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cosmos Airdrops” (@cosmos_airdropsy), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cosmos_airdropsy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.