Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for космический бред | кишлак

Channel

космический бред | кишлак

@cosmbred

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

946subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002515847338
TypeChannel
Username@cosmbred
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cosmbred

Growth

9469689577 August 2026 — 968 subscribers8 August 2026 — 968 subscribers14 August 2026 — 956 subscribers20 August 2026 — 948 subscribers26 August 2026 — 946 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 19 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 943–971 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 23:46946-2
20 Aug 2026, 14:03948-8
14 Aug 2026, 00:44956-12
8 Aug 2026, 00:46968no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:35968first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

271 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542732719443308049511241.3%
custom 52426966177813793869535.1%
😇3914.4%
custom 5460739974116690939259.23%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 271reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 27 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Nov 2025, 22:02 UTC≈1,820 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

жди ублюдок

custom 524269661778137938629😇8custom 54273271944330804956

27 Nov 2025, 22:02 UTC≈1,770 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

вижу что ты хочешь

custom 524269661778137938625

27 Nov 2025, 22:02 UTC≈1,770 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

го тодда и акк удаляю?)

custom 542732719443308049520

27 Nov 2025, 22:01 UTC≈1,770 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

причем тут он? что те тгк сделал если по факту ты сама и виновата

custom 542732719443308049518

27 Nov 2025, 22:00 UTC≈1,740 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

чо го тгк удалим?)

😇18custom 542732719443308049510custom 54607399741166909399

27 Nov 2025, 21:59 UTC≈1,730 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я не про тгк ес че,что что но вы меня не предавали

custom 54607399741166909391

27 Nov 2025, 21:55 UTC≈1,690 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

в прочем я устал на себе что то тянуть,все

custom 524269661778137938616

27 Nov 2025, 21:53 UTC≈1,620 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

если хотите быть заскамлены то покупайте

custom 524269661778137938614custom 54607399741166909396😇4custom 54273271944330804954

27 Nov 2025, 21:52 UTC≈1,400 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мб нужен кому этот тгк? продам цену лс обсудим @N3NABICTb

27 Nov 2025, 21:36 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 8 August 2026

не знаю чем сегодняшняя ситуация закончится,но надеюсь все будет нормально

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cosmbred. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“космический бред | кишлак” (@cosmbred), 946 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cosmbred.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.