Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КОРТИЗАНИЯ

Channel

КОРТИЗАНИЯ

@cortyzania

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

994subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001639627429
TypeChannel
Username@cortyzania
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cortyzania

Growth

9939999968 August 2026 — 999 subscribers8 August 2026 — 999 subscribers16 August 2026 — 993 subscribers24 August 2026 — 994 subscribers9948 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 992–1,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 14:53994+1
16 Aug 2026, 14:48993-6
8 Aug 2026, 11:00999no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:56999first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.41%
avg views ÷ 994 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total221
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

318 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16150.6%
❤‍🔥6620.8%
🔥309.43%
👏288.81%
👍175.35%
🥴61.89%
💔41.26%
💋30.943%
👀10.314%
👎10.314%
😇10.314%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 318reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC50 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я кстати живой и здоровый. Новый видос монтируется. Ближайшие дни постараюсь доделать его и останется только превью. Так же на следующей неделе запущу парочку стримов. Приходите на них, мне есть что вам рассказать интересное 😼

8🥴4💋3👀1👏1

7 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC51 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всегда питал особую страсть к мужчинам в трико 😙

11❤‍🔥4🔥3👏1

1 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC120 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Моя женщина приготовила мне покушать на работу 😼 Первый день отказа от фастфуда пошёл 🙈

15❤‍🔥7👍4

24 Jul 2026, 17:24 UTC182 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

14❤‍🔥5🔥4👏1

23 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC178 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прошу мне не завидовать...

🔥114❤‍🔥2👎1👏1

23 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC156 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nepoweaseloPhoto

Моя жена не дала мне... Выбрать (Trail & Error) Дикозападные семейные разборки на колеснице бомжей вместе с Данилой Кортизолычем https://youtu.be/EzcgxolxFKk

8❤‍🔥1👏1

21 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC176 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Щас поедем домой 😡 Было круто, я буду скучать 💔

10❤‍🔥4💔4👍1👏1

21 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC166 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3👏3

20 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC167 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Завтра еду домой! Как же я устал, так хочу в родную кроватку 😭

7❤‍🔥3👏3

20 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC177 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6❤‍🔥4🔥2👍1👏1

17 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC199 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мама мия 🤌

11🔥4❤‍🔥3👏1

17 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC144 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Hello I'm under the water 🐠🐠🐠

❤‍🔥10👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cortyzania. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 92,904 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КОРТИЗАНИЯ” (@cortyzania), 994 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cortyzania.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.