Channel
@coqpka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
10,726subscribers
-172 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002119889098 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coqpka |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coqpka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 10,726 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 10,729 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 10,739 | -15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 10,754 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 10,759 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 10,769 | -15 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 10,784 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 10,781 | -21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 10,802 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 10,808 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 10,813 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 10,819 | -27 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 10,846 | -12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 10,858 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 10,862 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 10,866 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 10,877 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 10,892 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 10,888 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 10,900 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (30 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 45,174 |
| Reactions total | 531 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
552 reactions across 37 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 346 | 62.7% | |
| 💯 | 76 | 13.8% | |
| 👍 | 61 | 11.1% | |
| 🤣 | 48 | 8.70% | |
| 😍 | 21 | 3.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 552reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Захотелось поделиться с вами в таком формате нашими делами. Девочки, кто тоже с ребёнком уже не помещается в квартире (особенно, если игрушки разбросаны и ты пытаешься приткнуть свой спортивный коврик куда-нибудь)? 😹 Я люблю запад Москвы и рассматриваю это направление. Больше смотрите в видео 💛
❤8
Из новинок #длямалыша 🟣кроссы от Happy Baby Крутые! Но бренд будто всегда маломерит размера на полтора. для девочек тоже вообще супер принт красивый! У Ромы сейчас 22, а кроссовки взяли 24, так чтобы на осень хватило и с теплым носком было удобно! 🟡каталка - бомба, честно говоря Одна из самых интересных игрушек сейчас, чаще на улице, но вообще за свои деньги реально топчик. Видела в ленте такую же, но чуть дороже.
👍10
⬆️На пробу хочу вот это жесточайше, вообще хочу всё… но надо как-то, наверное, не все сразу… кто пользуется Medicube, расскажите, что вам нравится?
1550₽ Тоник с кислотами для сияния кожи Medicube Kojic Acid Toner отшелушивает ороговевшие клетки, смягчает и выравнивает микрорельеф, избавляет от тусклости
1900₽ Пузырьковая сыворотка с коллагеном и ПДРН Medicube PDRN Pink Collagen Bubble Serum повышает эластичность и упругость
1900₽ 🔥 Пилинг для проблемной кожи с янтарной кислотой Medicube Red Acne Succinic Peel мягко отшелушивает, очищает и сужает поры, препятствует образованию комедонов
1300₽ Крем для век с ПДРН и пептидами Medicube PDRN Pink Peptide Eye Cream устраняет тусклость и следы усталости, осветляет тёмные круги и пигментацию
1700₽ Ночная маска-плёнка с ретинолом и витамином С medicube Kojic Night Wrapping Mask устраняет тусклость и выравнивает тон, защищает от фотостарения
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Сейчас покажу, что мне полюбилось в последнее время!
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @coqpka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Жадина говядина…
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“мамские мысли и рекомендации” (@coqpka), 10,726 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coqpka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.