Channel
@copy_teacher
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
180subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002232789588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @copy_teacher |
| Description | За год в онлайне создала обучения для плавного и комфортного входа во фриланс. Вк сообщество - https://vk.com/stasy3227 ТГ-канал - https://t.me/copy_teacher Связь со мной: @stasy3227 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/copy_teacher |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 180 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 180 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 29 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,021 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 269 | 26.3% | |
| ❤ | 265 | 26.0% | |
| 👏 | 146 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 126 | 12.3% | |
| 😁 | 56 | 5.48% | |
| 🤯 | 29 | 2.84% | |
| 👌 | 28 | 2.74% | |
| ❤🔥 | 27 | 2.64% | |
| 😱 | 27 | 2.64% | |
| 🎄 | 20 | 1.96% | |
| 🥰 | 20 | 1.96% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 0.588% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.196% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,021reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 15 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Университет для воришек твоих кровных шекелей. Теперь я точно знаю, что отвечать, когда у меня будут спрашивать про дипломы и образование😂 Давайте пофантазируем, как там проходят пары?😀
😁12👍5👏4
Вот это мощь😂 Я бы точно дочитала такой пост ✨ А вы?)
❤10👍2
Если речь о заголовке для тг-блога, я бы написала так: Факты от британских учёных поставили раком любителей утреннего напитка! Узнайте больше о вреде кофе для сердца, это просто разъёб!
👍7👏5❤4
БОГ РАССЫЛКИ или КАК НЕ НАДО ДЕЛАТЬ РАССЫЛКУ Дело было еще летом 2024 и я искала подарок кому-то из близких на день рождения. Гуля по интернету я нашла студию портретов и я решила, что это хорошая идея. Было заметно, что со мной общается бот, поэтому, когда я поняла, что сроки меня не устраивают - я прекратила переписку. Дело было в ВК, а я туда захожу раз в пятилетку... я ловила пару раз уведомления от этой студии…
👍38❤33🔥24👏18🤯1
Вопрос к экспертам: какая цель перед вами ближайшие месяц-три
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤30👍28❤🔥27🥰9👏7
Формула ПУПСиК Или всем нам знакомая и любимая формула 4U+K на зарубежный лад. А в России вот так тепло и с усмешкой - ПУПСиК. По сути слегка устаревшее веяние, но можно из нее выкрутить кое-какие фишки. В раскладке ПУПСиК: ✨ - Польза ✨ - Уникальность ✨ - Прицельность ✨ - Срочность и ✨ - Ключевые слова. Теперь углубимся. Каждый заголовок имеет основу. Тезис. Тема. Запрос. Это в посте про формулу ПУПСиК написать …
👍48🔥33👏30❤7🥰6
А вы знаете о формуле для заголовков ПУПСиК?😉
❤23😁13🤔2👍1
Как подготовить свое обращение к копирайтеру? Представим ситуацию: У вас хороший поток клиентов, заявок, внутренней работы. Вы посвящаете себя своим клиентам и своему развитию. И хотели бы посвящать больше, но львиную долю рабочего времени вы отдаете контенту: разработка стратегий, воронок, написание постов, составление офферов. А надо бы еще и в медийность: эфиры, рилсы, сторис. Что нам, вообще от экранов не отрыва…
👏23👍16🔥16❤13
Чем вы занимаетесь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍26👏16🥰3
Срочное дополнение к посту выше ⬆️ Все понятно. Вы мои умницы, любите и умеете достигать своих целей, желаний и исполнять свои мечты. Для вас это не страдания, а классный экспириенс и вообще любимое дело. Пост написан не в ваш адрес, к вашему же счастью. Пост написан больше для прокрастинаторов и диванных мечтателей, кто хочет создавать свою лучшую жизнь и продолжает ничего для этого не делать потому что "это слож…
❤6🥰2👍1🔥1
Путь к мечте всегда тернист… … и это не значит, что нужно останавливаться. Почему я считаю, что чем труднее - тем круче? Почему нужно идти туда, где страшно? Почему трудный путь = высокая награда? И так, давайте разбираться. Начну издалека. Что же такое «мечта»? По сути своей, мечта - это обычное желание, путь к исполнению которого - затруднен. Мы хотим поесть борщ. Это желание. Мы хотим летом поехать в отпуск к…
👍21❤18🔥16😁8⚡6
ВНИМАНИЕ! МОШЕННИКИ!
🤯28😱27👏13❤11👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @copy_teacher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вопрос к экспертам: какая цель перед вами ближайшие месяц-три
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Чем вы занимаетесь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 15 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,172,022 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@copy_teacher named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Настя о текстах | 𝕎𝕠𝕣𝕜&𝕎𝕣𝕚𝕥𝕖” (@copy_teacher), 180 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/copy_teacher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.