Channel
@copiday
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23,000subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003661409492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @copiday |
| Created | 8 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/copiday |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 23,000 | -31 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 23,031 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 23,031 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 April 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,900 |
| Reactions total | 115 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5,638 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,339 | 41.5% | |
| 👍 | 1,756 | 31.1% | |
| 🔥 | 695 | 12.3% | |
| 🎉 | 573 | 10.2% | |
| 🥰 | 76 | 1.35% | |
| 🐳 | 69 | 1.22% | |
| 🤔 | 46 | 0.816% | |
| 👏 | 33 | 0.585% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 0.408% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 0.266% | |
| 👀 | 13 | 0.231% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,638reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
More rewards. More opportunities. The Deposit Tasks have been updated with brand-new withdrawable rewards. Complete eligible deposit tasks, unlock rewards, and claim them directly to your account. Log in today and check out the latest tasks.
🤔46❤37🔥14👀13🎉5
Your referrals now earn even more. Starting today, you'll receive 10% of the fees generated by every user you refer to CopiDay. No extra work. No hidden conditions. Simply invite your friends, grow your network, and earn passive rewards as they trade. Start sharing. Start earning. Join CopiDay today.
❤281👍117🔥42🎉39👏11
The trader you copy matters less than the strategy you stick with. Most portfolios don't fail because of bad entries. They fail because people switch plans every time the market gets noisy. How long have you followed the same strategy without changing it?
❤389👍169🔥53🎉46🥰37
A profitable strategy can look terrible before it looks right. That’s the part screenshots never show.
❤143👍78🔥42🎉32🐳17
The market doesn’t test your strategy first. It tests your patience.
👍185❤111🔥35🎉26🐳14
Two people copy the same trader. One profits. One quits. The difference isn’t the strategy. It’s how they handle it. Start Copying with COPIDAY
❤178👍89🔥45🎉30🐳10
At what point do you stop following a trader? After a loss? After a bad week? Or only when the strategy breaks? Most exits don’t happen because the strategy failed. They happen because patience did. Curious how you decide. Start Copying with COPIDAY
👍141❤68🔥40🎉32🐳6
Copy trading doesn’t reward impatience. It rewards staying through the parts that feel uncertain. That’s where consistency is built. And where most people walk away.
👍114❤67🎉38🔥27🐳8
Copy trading isn’t about copying wins. It’s about understanding losses. Because that’s the part that decides whether you stay or quit too early. Start Copying with COPIDAY
👍117🔥62❤59🎉33🐳5
A good strategy isn’t always comfortable to follow. There are periods where nothing works. Moments where it feels wrong. That’s usually where most decisions get made. And where most mistakes happen.
👍127❤77🔥32🎉26🐳9
Everyone looks for the “best” trader. The highest returns. The cleanest chart. But no strategy is perfect. There are losses. There are drawdowns. There are bad weeks. The difference is simple: Knowing what you’re copying vs just hoping it works. Start Copying with COPIDAY
❤157👍64🔥33🎉29👏7
Copy trading doesn’t remove control. It shows how you use it. Who you follow, how much you risk, when you stop… Those decisions were always yours.
❤134👍62🔥32🎉27👏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @copiday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,076,923 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Copiday Announcements” (@copiday), 23,000 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/copiday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.