Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Copernicani - innamorati del futuro

@copernicani

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

110subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001174202500
TypeChannel
Username@copernicani
DescriptionCanale di comunicazione delle attività dell’associazione Copernicani
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/copernicani

Growth

1107 Aug 2026, 20:38 — 110 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 07:30 — 110 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:389 Aug 2026, 07:30
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109–111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 07:30110no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:38110first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 January 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Videos
1
Links
182

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2022 to 1 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2022, 21:23 UTC682 viewsread 9 August 2026

Dal nostro sito: Voto elettronico: la posizione dei Copernicani alla Conferenza sul Futuro dell’Europa https://ift.tt/3ru1p9S

24 Mar 2022, 17:42 UTC580 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Dal nostro sito: Considerazioni sulla governance degli interventi volti a trasformare e innovare la Pubblica Amministrazione in chiave digitale https://ift.tt/9FAwpev

👍1

24 Feb 2022, 16:32 UTC434 viewsread 9 August 2026

Dal nostro sito: Giovedì 3 marzo ore 21:00 La sovranità digitale europea e le big tech https://ift.tt/EFjbw6p

18 Feb 2022, 10:57 UTC247 viewsread 9 August 2026

Dal nostro sito: L’Europa del futuro e il futuro dell’e-voting https://ift.tt/CZVeYAR

9 Feb 2022, 15:48 UTC236 viewsread 9 August 2026

Dal nostro sito: I Copernicani portano la sicurezza digitale a scuola al Museo della Scienza e della Tecnica https://ift.tt/TFWPakn

27 Jan 2022, 19:22 UTC321 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Dal nostro sito: Chi è il Presidente della Repubblica più coesivo? Con il Giudizio Maggioritario ne avremmo già uno. E godrebbe del consenso più largo nel paese. https://ift.tt/3H8MbbY

👍1

25 Jan 2022, 20:07 UTC176 viewsread 9 August 2026

Dal nostro sito: Martedì 8 febbraio ore 21:00. NFT: la punta dell’iceberg. https://ift.tt/3rOweBo

22 Jan 2022, 18:31 UTC197 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ciao a tutti, scusate l'inconveniente. I reiterati annunci su "Hacking budget 2022" non erano previsti. Noi del gruppo "COP Comunicazione", abbiamo avuto un problema ... 😕 di comunicazione! 🙂

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @copernicani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Copernicani - innamorati del futuro” (@copernicani), 110 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/copernicani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.