Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐡𝐲 𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐚

Channel

𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐡𝐲 𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐚

@coolecl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

564subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003222272165
TypeChannel
Username@coolecl
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/coolecl

Growth

564597580.57 August 2026 — 597 subscribers8 August 2026 — 597 subscribers15 August 2026 — 588 subscribers22 August 2026 — 574 subscribers28 August 2026 — 564 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 559–602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 23:24564-10
22 Aug 2026, 16:52574-14
15 Aug 2026, 00:36588-9
8 Aug 2026, 03:16597no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:16597first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held14 (1 April 20262 August 2026)
Views total
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡3343.4%
💋810.5%
👎56.58%
💔56.58%
🖕56.58%
🤨56.58%
❤‍🔥33.95%
🍾33.95%
🤬33.95%
👍22.63%
🔥11.32%
🗿11.32%
😈11.32%
🤣11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 May 2026, 13:29 UTC101 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А с каких пор флиртовать и быть нежными со всеми подряд есть норма при наличии сп? Может я че не догоняю в нынешнем вирте? Реакции не забываем!🌐 Бот для ваших тейков — @coollecl_bot

🤡3

14 May 2026, 06:41 UTC114 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Объясните мне нах с нескольких аккаунтов заходить в кф и с одного акка мутить с девушкой, а с другой искать себе ЖОСКИ ЧБЧГ? Реакции не забываем!🌐 Бот для ваших тейков — @coollecl_bot

🤡4🤨1😈1

5 May 2026, 19:05 UTC134 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Давайте поговорим про тех, кто записывает голосовые сообщения на каналы.не блоги и эстеты, а на вирт проекты. Я вообще не люблю слушать голосовые от незнакомых людей и когда я вижу такие сообщения в каналах на крупную аудиторию с длительностью по 5-20 минут у меня возникают вопросы, а точно ли люди себя обозначают как вирт персону, придерживающуюся понятий старого вирта или всё-таки устраивают личный блог на канале п

🤡5👍2💋2

29 Apr 2026, 03:58 UTC142 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На счет ролки (да, я немножко поздно) Я с самого начала в вирте не интересовался ролкой, меня как-то это не вставляло, да было интересно как и что даже в один момент было желание чисто со стороны наблюдать как другие ролят, хвхазахв че за фетишь подскажите. И так вот я при знакомстве сразу об этом всегда предупреждаю, если знакомство не в дружеском плане, но большинство из тех с кем дальше продвигалось общение пытали

❤‍🔥2💋1🔥1

23 Apr 2026, 17:16 UTC107 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Написал чел,с просьбой познакомится.Перекинулись пару сообщениями по типу как зовут и чем заняты.Теперь эта ересь кидает эту хуйню. Теперь вопрос..обязательно с первым встречным надо флиртовать в Вирте?Или это я долбаеб? Реакции не забываем!🍒 Бот для ваших тейков — @coollecl_bot

🤡4💋1

19 Apr 2026, 21:30 UTC104 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

лично я иногда прибегаю к боту, когда уж прям пиздец как хочется. нашел чисто для себя альтернативу — пишу фф, зарисовки. но не вставляет так, как от ответа собеседника и его хода мыслей, хоть и помогает разгрузить мысли.

💔5

19 Apr 2026, 21:27 UTC189 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

вы ролите?

  1. да.66%
  2. нет.7%
  3. с ботами чилю.21%
  4. умею, но не с кем.45%
  5. ролка? фу, бож, че за кринж?3%
  6. хочу научиться.7%

The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

💋4🍾2

19 Apr 2026, 21:14 UTC106 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Здравствуйте. У меня очень странная ситуация и хочу выговориться вам. Я олд вирта, тут уже 7 лет и найти в нынешних реалиях ролевика это целое искусство. И я недавно с новым знакомым обмолвился, что ужасно хочу отролить один сюжет. Он предложил свою кандидатуру, прислал показательнфй пост, в нем были некоторые ошибки, но большой. Я обрадовался, ведь так давно ждал и искал соролевика. Мы начинаем сюжет и мне приходит

🤡7👎3🤨3🍾1

9 Apr 2026, 12:02 UTC123 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У моего бывшего появились отношения и я понял что ревную его до сих пор и люблю. Расстались в конце ноября и все это время иногда писал ему в анон потому-что скучаю. Что мне делать и как забыть его? Реакции не забываем!♥️ Бот для ваших тейков — @coollecl_bot

🖕3👎1🤬1

1 Apr 2026, 17:47 UTC163 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

сегодня каждый второй канал писал о закрытии и прощание,через час уже(с первым апреля!)и вот мне уже после третьего стало скучно такое читать.почему все сегодня помешаны на закрытии?неужели нельзя было придумать,что-то более смешное? Реакции не забываем!♥️ Бот для ваших тейков — @coollecl_bot

🤡4❤‍🔥1🗿1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @coolecl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Apr 2026, 21:27 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

вы ролите?

  1. да.66%
  2. нет.7%
  3. с ботами чилю.21%
  4. умею, но не с кем.45%
  5. ролка? фу, бож, че за кринж?3%
  6. хочу научиться.7%

The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐡𝐲 𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐚” (@coolecl), 564 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coolecl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.