Channel
@coolapkfan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
229subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001320036186 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coolapkfan |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coolapkfan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 229 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 226 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 226 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 731 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
酷安小编称多年收到上万封厂商下架函，仅苹果未发过 酷安小编发文称，酷安多年来收到不少厂商发来的内容下架函，累计估计有上万封，几乎每天都有，其中只有苹果从未发过函。有的厂商态度十分强硬，甚至到了「捂嘴」的地步，用户说一点产品不好都不行，就是不能让品牌出现任何负面信息。 文章认为，一个产品在网上完全没有负面评价反而显得假，而且遭遇此类处理的发声用户往往很容易转投其他品牌。文章最后建议用户在说产品缺点时用词平和客观、有理有据、实事求是，不要使用个人情绪过重的表达。 酷安小编 🌸 在花频道 · 茶馆水群 · 投稿通道
💩1🤯1
最便宜的Leica，更青春的Ultra？——小米17T「影像」专题万字图文 via 酷安图文 - 编辑精选 (author: 碳酸鈣)
#人像摄影# 谁家学姐？虽然不是同一天拍的但是同一个人就一起发了吧，希望你们也能找到自己想拍的jk小姐姐 #手机摄影# #数码日常# via 收藏榜-周榜 (author: pulchre)
理光也能拍 live 了？ 其实是#vivoXFold6 拍的，人像live，使用追光色彩模式，直出#人像摄影# #vivoXFold6# via 收藏榜-周榜 (author: 李明殊)
#人像摄影# 记录第一次互勉 刚买相机没多久，算是第二次使用相机拍照 设备 松下S5M2 ＋铭匠 50neo 照片均为香酥蛋糕预设直出 via 收藏榜-周榜 (author: xiaoBing_233)
第 100 条动态忍了很久，终于可以发了。博士毕业论文终于交完了 剑桥大学卡文迪许实验室的量子物理博士 每一个词的能量估计都可以拉满了[吐舌][吐舌] 时间长达 4... via 收藏榜-周榜 (author: JsS321)
#ChinaJoy2026# 这届的cj比前两年好了很多，高质量coser随处可见 via 收藏榜-周榜 (author: 悠闲放松)
🥰1
#人像摄影# 拍jk小姐姐是真的简单，希望大家都能拍出好看的jk小姐姐 #手机摄影# #数码日常# via 收藏榜-周榜 (author: pulchre)
2026 港区盛夏清凉节 IP： 碧蓝航线 又到周五啦，给酷友们来波最新的碧蓝航线清凉节的素材更新。 上一期发了后发现有酷狗盗图不说，偷偷的拿我的图去起号，涨了... via 收藏榜-周榜 (author: 枫夏ovo)
换新设备了，现在变富士康了 富士zf＋腾龙2875直出的效果，对焦其实比佳能RP好很多，但RP也够用了 #手机摄影# #摄影# via 收藏榜-周榜 (author: 墨冷朔)
单发一下这个小姐姐，笑容很灿烂，酷友看腻了那种浮夸的，我发一个小清新一点的，感觉小姐姐画的妆也不浓，五官立体还挺好看的，你们觉得呢[受虐滑稽]，在签售会... via 收藏榜-周榜 (author: 高山流水遇机音)
Xiaomi-QC解锁BL工具-小米骁龙8E保姆级解锁BL教程 via 收藏榜-周榜 (author: 莫离然然)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coolapkfan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 509,982 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coolapk-Fan Channel” (@coolapkfan), 229 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coolapkfan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.