Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for i hate being a manager its awesome

Channel

i hate being a manager its awesome

@conversationsaboutmusic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,503subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001077678236
TypeChannel
Username@conversationsaboutmusic
Created21 January 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/conversationsaboutmusic

Growth

10,50310,54010,521.56 August 2026 — 10,539 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,539 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,540 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,538 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,537 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,534 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,531 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,529 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,525 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,522 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,521 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,519 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,518 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,516 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,515 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,514 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,512 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,511 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,508 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,505 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,503 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 25 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,497–10,546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 21:5210,503-2
29 Aug 2026, 22:2410,505-3
28 Aug 2026, 22:2510,508-3
27 Aug 2026, 21:1410,511-1
26 Aug 2026, 19:0810,512-2
25 Aug 2026, 16:0910,514-1
24 Aug 2026, 17:1710,515-1
23 Aug 2026, 00:4610,516-2
21 Aug 2026, 17:3810,518-1
19 Aug 2026, 11:3510,519-2
18 Aug 2026, 13:4310,521-1
17 Aug 2026, 16:0810,522-3
16 Aug 2026, 06:5710,525-4
14 Aug 2026, 16:0310,529-2
12 Aug 2026, 04:2210,531-3
11 Aug 2026, 06:4110,534-3
9 Aug 2026, 05:5110,537-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:1810,538-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:5710,540+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:1510,539first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4,931 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,12543.1%
👏80116.2%
🤔63412.9%
🎉59212.0%
🐳4829.77%
🤮1793.63%
🤯1182.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,931reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2024 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
214
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 17 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @conversationsaboutmusic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 December 2024 to 2 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2026, 13:27 UTC≈4,800 views291 reactions17 Starsread 29 August 2026

В экономике, в которой увольняют тысячами уже даже казалось бы неприкасаемых айтишников, не может быть никакой другой логики, кроме как жестких сокращений без лирики и чрезмерной рефлексии. Это наблюдается абсолютно везде: люди больше не могут себе позволить то, что могли. Глобально обсуждаются непродающиеся стадионы у абсолютных глобальных хитмейкеров и уход из стримингов из-за регулярного повышения стоимости подпис

🔥144🤔68🎉23🤯19🐳16🤮11👏10

27 Mar 2026, 16:39 UTC≈7,420 views203 reactions8 Starsread 29 August 2026

В июле 2025 года новый секси-конкурент привычным соцсетям Substack привлёк 100 млн долларов, крупнейший раунд за восемь лет существования компании. Для платформы, выросшей из сервиса email-рассылок в единорога и полноценную экосистему для авторов с оценкой в 1,1 млрд — это, конечно, вау. Особенно в мире, где медийные активы самые нестабильные и низкомаржинальные, и особенно сейчас С 2020 года индустрия заговорила о

🔥129👏34🐳27🤔10🤮3

27 Feb 2026, 15:44 UTC≈8,610 views316 reactions8 Starsread 29 August 2026

2025й — первый год, когда индустрия начала официально фиксировать свои отношения с ИИ. Судебные иски, публичные попытки договориться, громкие пресс‑релизы — все это была длинная прелюдия и игра на опережение. Сценарий уже знаком: новая технология сносит всех на своем пути, бизнес встает в позу и пытается все заблокировать, прикрываясь артистами и их легаси. В итоге музгиганты кое‑как договариваются на крохи от будуще

🎉146🔥82🐳40👏26🤔13🤮9

31 Dec 2025, 14:18 UTC≈14,800 views682 reactions19 Starsread 29 August 2026

10 лет симпатичная дата, чтобы порефлексировать о профессии и индустрии в которой конфликт интересов и конфиденциальность для многих - пустой звук в любой книге о менеджменте артистов первым пунктом идет рассказ о фидуциарной обязанности ставить интересы артиста выше собственных. это не нужно закреплять в договоре, полное доверие и секретность подразумеваются автоматически. например, нельзя представлять артиста и п

🔥410🎉141🐳61🤔26🤮24👏20

25 Feb 2025, 16:23 UTC≈17,900 views249 reactions5 Starsread 29 August 2026

Главный музыкальный булли В 2012 году в музыкальной индустрии вместо четырех мейджоров осталось всего три: легендарный британский EMI разделили и распродали. Для музыкальной индустрии это был горький момент, а для нынешней большой тройки, конечно, великий. Именно после этой сделки Universal Music Group стал бесспорным лидером и уже точно музыкальной компанией №1. Сделку Universal Music одобрили только с одним услов

👏132🐳48🔥34🤮15🤔13🎉5🤯2

12 Feb 2025, 01:50 UTC≈15,600 views315 reactionsread 29 August 2026

ребята которые делают видео-эссе вы герои это конечно жесть но в итоге кайф

🔥247🎉32🐳22👏9🤮5

11 Feb 2025, 12:27 UTC≈16,000 views235 reactions10 Starsread 29 August 2026

https://youtu.be/7XB_2QR3CLg

🔥100🤔81🎉32🤯10👏5🤮4🐳3

31 Dec 2024, 22:47 UTC≈18,100 views494 reactions18 Starsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥373🎉78🐳33🤔4👏3🤮3

30 Dec 2024, 21:48 UTC≈17,700 views247 reactionsread 29 August 2026

как дела?

🔥125🐳63🤯21👏12🎉11🤮8🤔7

20 Dec 2024, 14:52 UTC≈19,500 views140 reactions31 Starsread 29 August 2026

В ответ на обвинения Дрейка о снижении ставки на 30% в обмен на рекомендации, представитель Spotify заявил сегодня в комментарии для MBW: «У Spotify нет экономического стимула для того, чтобы пользователи стримили Not Like Us вместо треков Дрейка. Только один из инструментов Spotify for Artists, Marquee, был использован для продвижения этой песни за €500 во Франции. Marquee — это визуальная реклама, которая отображае

👏107🐳16🤔16🤮1

13 Dec 2024, 21:05 UTC≈15,900 views229 reactions33 Starsread 29 August 2026

блин мне говорят, я обидела своим постом

🤔134🐳48🤯17🎉13🤮9🔥6👏2

13 Dec 2024, 14:48 UTC≈16,400 views598 reactions35 Starsread 29 August 2026

Есть одна общая черта у корпоративных сотрудников: когда их нанимают, они начинают работать, конечно, в самой лучшей компании на свете, а до и после, то есть без них, — она так себе. Мой любимый жанр — это когда сотрудник начинает хуесосить свою самую лучшую буквально месяц назад компанию, когда он уже ушел. Чаще всего это делают люди, которые с первого дня ставят хештеги в инсте под фоточками с тимбилдингов, будто э

👏422🔥118🤔23🎉16🐳10🤮9

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @conversationsaboutmusic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,428,383 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“i hate being a manager its awesome” (@conversationsaboutmusic), 10,503 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conversationsaboutmusic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.