Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Олег Максимов

@contentpirat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,191subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001226978660
TypeChannel
Username@contentpirat
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/contentpirat

Growth

1,1901,1941,1926 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,190 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,194 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,191 subscribers1,1916 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,189–1,195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:541,191-3
10 Aug 2026, 16:311,194+4
7 Aug 2026, 14:151,190-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:461,191no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:361,191first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.5%
avg views ÷ 1,191 subscribers
Avg views / post
351
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held9 (24 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,755
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7544.6%
👍6136.3%
105.95%
😁74.17%
🥰63.57%
42.38%
🏆21.19%
👏21.19%
😱10.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC183 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Разница в размере суппортов

1🔥1😱1

6 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC209 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня занимаемся установкой монструозных тормозов на Jetour T2. Приехали примерно за месяц. Андрей красавчик, если нужны механизмы на любую машину - пишите ему https://t.me/Xtens_Brakes

🔥51🥰1

29 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC410 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁7👍4👏2

27 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC449 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍10🔥3

26 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC504 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍18🔥5

16 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC757 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Есть идея вот такого проекта для экспедиции по Азии. Было бы интересно? База - BMW i8

🔥16👍5🥰3

8 Jul 2026, 16:39 UTC934 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

За 4 дня китайцы мне изготовили тормозную систему на мой Jetour T2. Жду пока приедет и буду ставить. Пишите если нужны контакты ребят, могут изготовить почти на любую машину

🔥153🏆2

6 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC713 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Не очень рандомные кадры недели. Нашел у себя старую советскую и японскую оптику, взял у @get_lens Sony A7cII и объединил их в пару. На кадрах новые дисочки, дача, собачка и лето Идеально

👍20🔥7🥰21

24 Jun 2026, 15:38 UTC779 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Итак, у Жетура новый диски. И они совершенно прекрасны. @powerwheels_russia просидели со мной не один день в обсуждениях, но результат того стоил. А еще их цвет очень сложно передать на фото и видео, вживую все равно по-другому

🔥237👍41

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @contentpirat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Олег Максимов” (@contentpirat), 1,191 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/contentpirat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.