Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Conspiracies

Channel

Conspiracies

@conspiracies

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

358subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001001487644
TypeChannel
Username@conspiracies
Created22 September 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/conspiracies

Growth

355358356.55 August 2026 — 355 subscribers6 August 2026 — 355 subscribers14 August 2026 — 356 subscribers21 August 2026 — 358 subscribers5 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 355–358 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 19:58358+2
14 Aug 2026, 06:53356+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:04355no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:26355first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

20 May 2026, 02:16 UTC70 viewsread 6 August 2026

The school board election in Massapequa is having the voting shenanigans that we are worried about on a national level https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1thoa8b/the_school_board_election_in_massapequa_is_having/

20 May 2026, 02:15 UTC67 viewsread 6 August 2026

EPA wants to repeal limits on ‘forever chemicals’ in drinking water https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1th5pmc/epa_wants_to_repeal_limits_on_forever_chemicals/

17 May 2026, 03:30 UTC69 viewsread 6 August 2026

How to Spot a Russian Deepfake | [2026 Bloomberg Investigates reports on Russian disinformation] https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1teug8c/how_to_spot_a_russian_deepfake_2026_bloomberg/

30 Mar 2026, 06:00 UTC134 viewsread 6 August 2026

Actual Conspiracies? https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1s6pcig/actual_conspiracies/

30 Mar 2026, 05:59 UTC108 viewsread 6 August 2026

ExxonMobil climate change denial https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1s6ht1k/exxonmobil_climate_change_denial/

26 Mar 2026, 07:40 UTC98 viewsread 6 August 2026

Simulation https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1s3xih7/simulation/

5 Mar 2026, 07:25 UTC127 viewsread 6 August 2026

Steel manning Simulation theory with CIA Informant, Consultant https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1rla1ba/steel_manning_simulation_theory_with_cia/

2 Mar 2026, 02:30 UTC113 viewsread 6 August 2026

Do you remember that one source from 30 years ago that had a lot of conspiracies correct? He posted a new one and all the old ones again https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1rigeml/do_you_remember_that_one_source_from_30_years_ago/

26 Feb 2026, 17:21 UTC108 viewsread 6 August 2026

Jeffrey Epstein potentially planning on making a movie discrediting victims https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1rfcuh9/jeffrey_epstein_potentially_planning_on_making_a/

10 Feb 2026, 03:17 UTC129 viewsread 6 August 2026

Need 200 conspiracy theories with verdicts from approved fact checking organizations! https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1r0bsa3/need_200_conspiracy_theories_with_verdicts_from/

6 Feb 2026, 05:18 UTC118 viewsread 6 August 2026

Anti-Vax Activism = Functional Eugenics https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1qx8ri8/antivax_activism_functional_eugenics/

2 Feb 2026, 08:47 UTC158 viewsread 6 August 2026

Is this Bob Dylan in the Epstein files?? https://www.reddit.com/r/actualconspiracies/comments/1qt3k96/is_this_bob_dylan_in_the_epstein_files/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @conspiracies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 884,690 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Conspiracies” (@conspiracies), 358 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conspiracies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.