Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Конституциялық Сот 🇰🇿

Channel

Конституциялық Сот 🇰🇿

@consot_kz

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

7,185subscribers

+2,510 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001788049853
TypeChannel
Username@consot_kz
Description🇰🇿Қазақстан Республикасының Конституциялық Соты 🇰🇿Конституционный Суд Республики Казахстан https://taplink.cc/consud.kz
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/consot_kz

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

4,6757,1855,9306 August 2026 — 4,675 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,695 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,824 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,072 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,081 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,260 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,348 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,316 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,305 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,406 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,384 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,397 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,444 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,494 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,483 subscribers29 September 2026 — 5,899 subscribers6 October 2026 — 5,997 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,151 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,317 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,404 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,551 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,683 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,767 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,878 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,971 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,040 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,990 subscribers12 November 2026 — 7,185 subscribers6 August 202612 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 99 days, net +2,510. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,299–7,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 21:467,185+195
8 Nov 2026, 12:216,990-50
5 Nov 2026, 13:247,040+69
2 Nov 2026, 16:046,971+93
31 Oct 2026, 00:006,878+111
28 Oct 2026, 05:216,767+84
25 Oct 2026, 04:056,683+132
21 Oct 2026, 20:596,551+147
18 Oct 2026, 20:206,404+87
15 Oct 2026, 23:466,317+166
12 Oct 2026, 22:106,151+154
6 Oct 2026, 17:175,997+98
29 Sept 2026, 12:175,899+416
19 Sept 2026, 06:395,483-11
15 Sept 2026, 04:575,494+50
11 Sept 2026, 18:415,444+47
7 Sept 2026, 16:405,397+13
2 Sept 2026, 11:035,384-22
30 Aug 2026, 20:265,406+101
28 Aug 2026, 06:035,305first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.26%
avg views ÷ 7,185 subscribers
Avg views / post
378
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
38
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held68 (29 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total14,375
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 00:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,780
Videos
≈273
Links
≈1,670

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 23s
Average length
1m 44s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (10.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC333 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Конституционные Суды Казахстана, Германии и Литвы продолжат обмен опытом в рамках проекта Twinning В Конституционном Суде состоялось первое заседание Рабочего комитета по реализации проекта Twinning, направленного на укрепление институционального потенциала конституционного контроля при поддержке Европейского союза, конституционных судов Казахстана, Германии и Литвы. В мероприятии приняли участие Председатель Конс…

13 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC236 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Қазақстан, Германия және Литва Конституциялық соттары Twinning жобасы аясында тәжірибе алмасуды жалғастырады Конституциялық Сотта Еуропалық Одақтың, Қазақстан, Германия және Литва Конституциялық Соттарының қолдауымен конституциялық бақылаудың институционалдық әлеуетін нығайтуға бағытталған Twinning жобасын іске асыру жөніндегі Жұмыс комитетінің алғашқы отырысы өтті. Іс-шараға Қазақстан Республикасы Конституциялық С…

13 Nov 2026, 05:00 UTC315 viewsread 15 November 2026

Конституционный Суд разъяснил значение срока обращения при оценке допустимости жалобы Конституционный Суд Республики Казахстан рассмотрел обращение о проверке на соответствие Конституции пункта 3 статьи 29 Налогового кодекса Республики Казахстан и пункта 8 Правил ведения базы данных о лицах, получивших и расходовавших деньги и (или) иное имущество, предоставленные иностранными государствами, международными и иностра…

13 Nov 2026, 05:00 UTC326 viewsread 15 November 2026

Конституциялық Сот өтінішті қарауға қабылдау кезінде жүгіну мерзімінің маңызын түсіндірді Қазақстан Республикасының Конституциялық Соты Салық кодексінің 29-бабының 3-тармағын және шет мемлекеттер, халықаралық және шетелдік ұйымдар, шетелдіктер мен азаматтығы жоқ адамдар берген ақшаны және (немесе) өзге де мүлікті алған және жұмсаған тұлғалар туралы дерекқорды жүргізу, сондай-ақ мұндай тұлғаларды дерекқорға енгізу жә…

12 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC575 viewsread 15 November 2026

Конституционный Суд рассмотрел вопрос правовой определенности понятия «аморальный проступок» Конституционный Суд Республики Казахстан рассмотрел обращение о проверке на соответствие Конституции подпункта 14) пункта 1 статьи 52 Трудового кодекса, предусматривающего расторжение трудового договора с работником, выполняющим воспитательные функции, за совершение аморального проступка, несовместимого с продолжением работы…

12 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC386 viewsread 15 November 2026

Конституциялық Сот «моральға жат қылық» ұғымының құқықтық айқындылығы мәселесін қарады Қазақстан Республикасының Конституциялық Соты тәрбие беру функцияларын атқаратын жұмыскердің осы жұмысты жалғастырумен сыйыспайтын моральға жат қылық жасағаны үшін еңбек шартын бұзуды көздейтін Еңбек кодексінің 52-бабы 1-тармағының 14) тармақшасын Конституцияға сәйкестігі тұрғысынан тексеру туралы өтінішті қарады. Өтініш беруші м…

11 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC410 viewsread 15 November 2026

Конституционный Суд: несогласие с толкованием закона о банкротстве граждан не является основанием для конституционного контроля В Конституционный Суд поступило обращение о проверке на соответствие Конституции пункта 2 статьи 6 Закона «О восстановлении платежеспособности и банкротстве граждан Республики Казахстан», определяющего условия применения процедуры судебного банкротства. Поводом для обращения стал отказ в п…

11 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC340 viewsread 15 November 2026

Конституциялық Сот: азаматтардың банкроттығы туралы заңның түсіндірілуімен келіспеу конституциялық бақылау жүргізуге негіз болып табылмайды Конституциялық Сотқа «Қазақстан Республикасы азаматтарының төлем қабілеттілігін қалпына келтіру және банкроттығы туралы» Заңның сот арқылы банкроттық рәсімін қолдану шарттарын айқындайтын 6-бабының 2-тармағын Конституцияға сәйкестігі тұрғысынан тексеру туралы өтініш келіп түсті.…

11 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC299 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Судьи Конституционного Суда Казахстана приняли участие в международной конференции в Грузии 4-6 ноября в Батуми состоялась международная конференция «Роль конституционного контроля в правовом государстве», приуроченная к 30-летию Конституционного Суда Грузии. В мероприятии приняли участие представители органов конституционного правосудия более 20 государств, Европейского суда по правам человека, а также научного и …

11 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC305 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Қазақстан Конституциялық Сотының судьялары Грузияда өткен халықаралық конференцияға қатысты 4-6 қараша күндері Батуми қаласында Грузия Конституциялық Сотының 30 жылдығына арналған «Құқықтық мемлекеттегі конституциялық бақылаудың рөлі» тақырыбында халықаралық конференция өтті. Іс-шараға 20-дан астам мемлекеттің конституциялық сот төрелігі органдарының, Адам құқықтары жөніндегі Еуропалық соттың, сондай-ақ ғылыми және…

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @consot_kz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ҚР ЖОҒАРҒЫ СОТЫ
@Jogargy_sot · 21,295
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
🇰🇿ҚР ОҚУ-АҒАРТУ МИНИСТРЛІГІ
@oqu_agartu · 42,918
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q4231510 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelConstitutional Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Descriptionstate body in Kazakhstan
X / Twitter@conscourtKZ
YouTubeUCifqKk5L_cB86LlrlcUwN_A
Official sitehttps://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/ksrk

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Конституциялық Сот 🇰🇿” (@consot_kz), 7,185 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/consot_kz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.