Photo, posted without a caption
π€©15π₯13π₯°13β€10π8π―8π8β€βπ₯5

Channel
@consensusprops
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry
4,288subscribers
-288 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002568344164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @consensusprops |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/consensusprops |
Sports β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:57 | 4,288 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 4,296 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 4,301 | -12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:44 | 4,313 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 4,322 | -12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:31 | 4,334 | -9 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 4,343 | -6 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 4,349 | -20 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 07:15 | 4,369 | -27 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 4,396 | -52 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 4,448 | -17 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 4,465 | -14 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 4,479 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:27 | 4,490 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 4,495 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 4,506 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 4,519 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 4,532 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 4,544 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 4,551 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,375 reactions across 31 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π― | 283 | 11.9% | |
| β€ | 278 | 11.7% | |
| π₯ | 272 | 11.5% | |
| π | 268 | 11.3% | |
| π€© | 267 | 11.2% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 263 | 11.1% | |
| π | 263 | 11.1% | |
| π₯° | 247 | 10.4% | |
| π | 230 | 9.68% | |
| π | 1 | 0.042% | |
| π | 1 | 0.042% | |
| π± | 1 | 0.042% | |
| π€ | 1 | 0.042% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 2,375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
π€©15π₯13π₯°13β€10π8π―8π8β€βπ₯5
Results: Consensus Player Prop of the Day A. Gray (ATL) Over 32.5 Pts+Reb+Ast (-110) π ββοΈ Recent Free Prop Results: WNBA: +3.30U (last 4 picks) MLB: +12.90U (last 13 picks) β Join the Collective. π§ Trust the Consensus. π° Win Long-Term. Premium Membership Options: https://whop.com/thecappercollective/
π₯10β€βπ₯9π9π8π€©8π―6β€5π5
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯°14π₯13π―11π€©9π9β€βπ₯8π8β€7
π¨ IMPORTANT TCC UPDATE: WEβRE MOVING TO WHOP π¨ Collective, itβs time for the next chapter. As TCC continues to grow, we want everything in one place and easier for you guys to access. Thatβs why weβre officially moving The Capper Collective community to Whop. π’ Whop will become the new home for our plays, education, community, contests, giveaways and everything weβre building next. π’ FREE ACCESS β’ Daily Free Consβ¦
π€©12β€9π―9β€βπ₯8π₯8π8π6π₯°6
Results: Consensus Player Prop of the Day P. Bueckers (DAL) Over 29.5 Pts+Reb+Ast (-120) β Recent Free Prop Results: WNBA: +5.50U (last 3 picks) MLB: +12.90U (last 13 picks) β Join the Collective. π§ Trust the Consensus. π° Win Long-Term. Premium Membership Options: https://whop.com/thecappercollective/
π―12π9π€©9β€8π₯7π₯°7π6π5
Consensus Player Prop of the Day WNBA (3:30pm EST) P. Bueckers (DAL) Over 29.5 Pts+Reb+Ast (-120) Confidence Score: 81% = 2U βComment and Winβ Contest One person who likes and comments on todayβs IG reel will win tomorrowβs complete Consensus Props Premium slate FOR FREE! π«‘ The Collective Analysis (Combined reasoning from top cappers) β’ Paige Bueckers continues to establish a high baseline across all major statiβ¦
π―14β€12π12π€©12β€βπ₯7π7π₯°6π6
Results: Consensus Player Prop of the Day K. Schwarber (PHI) Over 1.5 Total Bases (-110) π ββοΈ Recent Free Prop Results: WNBA: +3.30U (last 4 picks) MLB: +12.90U (last 13 picks) β Join the Collective. π§ Trust the Consensus. π° Win Long-Term.
π11π―10β€βπ₯9π9π8π€©8π₯7π₯°6
Consensus Player Prop of the Day MLB (6:05pm EST) K. Schwarber (PHI) Over 1.5 Total Bases (-110) Confidence Score: 83% = 2U βComment and Winβ Contest One person who likes and comments on todayβs IG reel will win tomorrowβs complete Consensus Props Premium slate FOR FREE! π«‘ The Collective Analysis (Combined reasoning from top cappers) β’ Kyle Schwarber is set up to clear Over 1.5 Total Bases as his home power trenβ¦
π17π12π₯11π9β€βπ₯7π―7π₯°7π€©6
Results: Consensus Player Prop of the Day B. Lowe (PIT) Over 1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs (-130) β Recent Free Prop Results: WNBA: +3.30U (last 4 picks) MLB: +15.10U (last 12 picks) β Join the Collective. π§ Trust the Consensus. π° Win Long-Term. Premium Membership Options: https://zaap.bio/consensusprops
β€15π14β€βπ₯13π12π9π―9π₯°9π₯8
Consensus Player Prop of the Day MLB (6:40pm EST) B. Lowe (PIT) Over 1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs (-130) Confidence Score: 82% = 2U βComment and Winβ Contest One person who likes and comments on todayβs IG reel will win tomorrowβs complete Consensus Props Premium slate FOR FREE! π«‘ The Collective Analysis (Combined reasoning from top cappers) β’ Brandon Lowe is primed to clear the 1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs line as he continues to β¦
π―12β€9π9π€©9β€βπ₯8π8π7π₯6
Results: Consensus Player Prop of the Day B. Harper (PHI) Over 1.5 Total Bases (-120) β Recent Free Prop Results: WNBA: +3.30U (last 4 picks) MLB: +13.10U (last 11 picks) β Join the Collective. π§ Trust the Consensus. π° Win Long-Term. Premium Membership Options: https://zaap.bio/consensusprops
π―14β€βπ₯12π9β€8π7π€©7π₯°7π7
Consensus Player Prop of the Day MLB (6:05pm EST) B. Harper (PHI) Over 1.5 Total Bases (-120) Confidence Score: 81% = 2U βComment and Winβ Contest One person who likes and comments on todayβs IG reel will win tomorrowβs complete Consensus Props Premium slate FOR FREE! π«‘ The Collective Analysis (Combined reasoning from top cappers) β’ Bryce Harper continues to showcase strong extra-base power that supports taking β¦
π―17π₯13π€©10π9π8β€6β€βπ₯4π₯°4
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @consensusprops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βTCC | Free Consensus Props π«‘β (@consensusprops), 4,288 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/consensusprops.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.