Channel
@conjunctions_QOF
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002604101025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @conjunctions_QOF |
| Created | 23 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/conjunctions_QOF |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 8 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 8 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 7 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 23 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (23 May 2025 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 39 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 5 | 71.4% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дружеские союзы: 82. ಇ 𝗜⃪⃪.𝐍𝐓𝐄𝘙𝗦⃜𝐓𝐄𝐋 Инфо-канал: @interstelinfo Лайф-канал: @interstellife Следящий: @vvvvvvinikk 83. 🧊 𝐂ꪮ𝗹𝐝 ’ 𝑺𝒆𝗿𝒆𝗻𝒊𝘁𝘆 Инфо-канал: @coldserenityinfo Лайф-канал: @coldserenitylife Следящий: @SundayMirai_bot
🐳1
Дружеские союзы: 74.˒˒ 𐐪 𝖠⃟𝗇𝗀ֺ𝖾𝗅 𝗐ƕֺ𝗂𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋 𓏽⑅٭ Инфо-канал: @ALW_1nfo Лайф-канал:@ALW_l1fe Следящий: @sowmxsz 75. Heimat Инфо-канал: https://t.me/heimatinfo Лайф-канал: https://t.me/heimatlive Следящий:@wel0pe_m 76. : ɪɴᴋɪ ((ɢᴀʏᴏ)) — #ғʟᴏᴏᴅ ! Инфо-канал: @inkigay0info Лайф-канал: @inkigay0life Следящий: @ku1rpuch 77. 𝑷𝒊𝒏𝒌 𝑺𝒖𝒏𝒔𝒆𝒕ৎ Инфо-канал: @pink_sunsetinfo Лайф-канал: @pink_sunsetlife Следящий: @Mini_Ku 78. …
🐳1
(Муичиро) Дружеские союзы: 38. HYØNA VIBE Инфо-канал: https://t.me/+C3q6XM0UbqkyY2My Лайф-канал: https://t.me/+3rLTpPOOAtJjYjZi Следящий: @Takishi_14 39. 𝐌𝐎𝐎𝐍 𝐅𝐀𝐍𝐆 Инфо-канал: @moonfangrp Лайф-канал: @moonfanglife Следящий: @pelmeshha_89 40. 𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 Инфо-канал: @berligh Лайф-канал: @lifeberlight Следящий: @q_werafk 41. ࿙݃࿙[𒄬]ᏀᎡᎪΝᎠᏴᏆͲᎬ࿐ Инфо-канал: @grandbiteinfo Лайф-канал: @grandbitelife Следящий: @staranon67b…
❤1🐳1💘1
(Муичиро) Семейные союзы: 1. Инфо-канал: Лайф-канал: Следящий: 2. 𝐒𝐧𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐇𝐨𝐥𝐞(жена) Инфо-канал: @krdinfo229 Лайф-канал: @krdlafe228 Следящий: @Hjbmjigd 3. ⃤⃟⃝𝙀𝙬!𝙄𝙂𝙚!𝙨_𝙋■𝙍!𝙖𝘿𝙞𝙎!𝙚⊹ ࣪ ˖ (тюленьчик) Инфо-канал: @EWP_info Лайф-канал: @EWP_life Следящий: @tiulen_69 4. 𝘁𝖺𝗺𝖻𝗈𝗿 (доченька) Инфо-канал: @tamborinfo Лайф-канал: @tamborlife Следящий: @exskle 5."𝘽𝙖𝙩 𝙘𝙖𝙫𝙚" 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙤𝙙 (айс-латте) Инфо-канал: @Bat_cave_flood Лайф-кана…
🐳1
(Муичиро) Дружеские союзы: 1. « ℰ𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝒦𝘢𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢 » Инфо-канал: @Info_Estate Лайф-канал: @Life_Estate2 Следящий: @Toppokiwu 2. 𝐒𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐀'𝐒 𝐂𝐎𝐙𝐘 𝐇𝐀𝐓 Инфо-канал: @SCH_kik Лайф-канал: @SCH_life_kik Следящий: @Tart_Sn 3. ˗ˏ𝗙𝔘𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘 𝗘𝗖𝗛𝔒𝗘𝗦՚՚ Инфо-канал: @FutureEchoesInfo Лайф-канал: @FutureEchoesLife Следящий: @mortiffe 4. 𝒮𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝐿𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉𝒸𝒶𝒹𝑒 Инфо-канал: @starlightcade Лайф-канал: @stattopm Следящий: @me0liet 5. ʙⳑᥙᴇʙᴇʀʀⲩ ⲇʀᴇᴀʍⲋ…
🐳1
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @conjunctions_QOF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 180,558 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Союзы Муичиро” (@conjunctions_QOF), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conjunctions_QOF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.