Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@comsight was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@merging held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026
Growth
37 measurements spanning 51 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,569–3,660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 07:21
3,632
-11
18 Sept 2026, 11:17
3,643
-1
18 Sept 2026, 10:58
3,644
+9
14 Sept 2026, 03:41
3,635
-2
13 Sept 2026, 19:40
3,637
-12
10 Sept 2026, 04:40
3,649
+1
10 Sept 2026, 01:37
3,648
+23
5 Sept 2026, 00:21
3,625
no change
4 Sept 2026, 18:55
3,625
-12
1 Sept 2026, 12:58
3,637
no change
31 Aug 2026, 21:05
3,637
+8
29 Aug 2026, 14:04
3,629
-2
29 Aug 2026, 02:58
3,631
-11
26 Aug 2026, 06:08
3,642
no change
26 Aug 2026, 03:52
3,642
-3
24 Aug 2026, 05:46
3,645
-4
23 Aug 2026, 06:17
3,649
+3
23 Aug 2026, 00:37
3,646
+26
20 Aug 2026, 10:52
3,620
+13
19 Aug 2026, 11:25
3,607
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
37s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
145 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 6120451189915000020
27
18.6%
custom 5364029976469315203
25
17.2%
custom 5372915683984152637
25
17.2%
🤡
22
15.2%
👍
20
13.8%
🕊
11
7.59%
custom 5368414803071081408
7
4.83%
💔
3
2.07%
custom 5368314927901580908
2
1.38%
🗿
2
1.38%
👎
1
0.69%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @comsight. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💰Trezor User Loses Life Savings to Google Sponsored Phishing Site
👤A user David claims he lost his life savings after clicking a top Google sponsored ad for “Trezor wallet” that led to a phishing page.
The fake site (hosted on Google Sites) tricked him into entering his recovery seed.
🔓Attacker’s address:
bc1qrz33mr7tx8wrpcs2pxrvv83hqwpm907s9shkz4
📱 @comsight | 💬Chat
🎁 Buy Premium & Stars
⚙️ @Season is the #1 Tele…
💻ZachXBT Refuses to Investigate Coldcard $100M+ Bitcoin Hack
1️⃣On-chain investigator ZachXBT has confirmed he will not monitor or trace the major Coldcard hardware wallet exploit. He stated that he prioritizes ecosystems that support his work, noting that Bitcoin maxis are generally not donors. As a result, he no longer feels obligated to take on complex unpaid cases.
📱 @comsight | 💬Chat
🎁 Buy Premium & Stars
⚙️ @…
😢ATTACKER Steals $500K Then Rugpulls Himself
🔗A Base user was phished for $501,940 USDC. The thief dumped it all into a Uniswap V4 pool with zero slippage protection and walked away with only 67 WETH — losing ~$373K of the stolen funds in one trade. An MEV bot took the rest. The victim is now asking both the bot and the attacker for a refund (plus 10% bounty).
what do you think👇?
📱 @comsight | 💬Chat
🎁 Buy Premium …
🚨FBI Seizes $15B+ in Crypto from Global Scam Networks
🇺🇸FBI Director Kash Patel announced Operation Blackout, a major crackdown on the global scam industry under the Trump administration.
Key results so far:
• $15 billion+ in cryptocurrency seized
• Dozens of scam compounds dismantled
• Hundreds arrested
• Thousands of trafficking victims freed
• 500+ fraudulent investment sites shut down
• Millions of scam a…
🚨$13,000 CAT TRADE
🐈⬛Scared Cat Celestia just sold for $13,000!
🌛Last night a BIG trade went down:
🎁Scared Cat Celestia Black was exchanged for a Plush Pepe Hue Jester 🐸+ $5,800 cash on top.
⚡️This is now the highest deal in the entire history of the Celestia model.
The market keeps heating up
📱 @comsight | 💬Chat
🎁 Buy Premium & Stars
⚙️ @Season is the #1 Telegram network for communities, events & giveaways!
🚨Bigger Coldcard Hack Update
🌐Galaxy reports 1,082 BTC (~$70.2 million) drained from 1,196 wallets — about 30 hours before the Coldcard Mk3 vulnerability was publicly disclosed.
This is significantly higher than the initial 594 BTC figure.
📱 @comsight | 💬Chat
🎁 Buy Premium & Stars
@Season is the #1 Telegram network for communities, events & giveaways!
🚨Coldcard Hardware Wallet Exploit: $38M BTC Drained
💳A critical flaw in Coldcard Mk3 (firmware 4.0.1 to 5.0.3) allowed attackers to steal 594 BTC (~$38 million) from ~500 wallets in just 25 minutes.
📄The bug made seed phrases predictable (weak randomness), so attackers could guess private keys without touching the devices.
❗️Coinkite Warning:
Move your funds ASAP if you generated seeds on affected Mk3 devices. Mk4,…
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @comsight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Legislative News” (@comsight), 3,632 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comsight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.