The SecPlus platform website is being shut down. Group updates will continue; no other changes will be implemented. and thank you for 2K members ❤️
❤5
Signed 𝔖𝔄𝔇

Channel
@comptiasec
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,176subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002238162983 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @comptiasec |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 4 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/comptiasec |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:02 | 2,176 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 2,168 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 2,169 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
129 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 93 | 72.1% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 15.5% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 11.6% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2024 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The SecPlus platform website is being shut down. Group updates will continue; no other changes will be implemented. and thank you for 2K members ❤️
❤5
Signed 𝔖𝔄𝔇
1st Donor: Misha ~ 4$
❤11
Thank you for the constant increasing visitors Our Domain secplus.hackinst.cc is requiring a renewal (annual payment) if you want the project to continue Please donate 2 - 5 dollars to keep the service running and ad-free BTC: bc1qasxkyvv6v7e5xcxl2azy8k2l27a9fvtjptml3n USDT(BNB): 0xa2003ba11b4648e93e8da612c21a2bb52ce8d67c ETH: 0xa2003ba11b4648e93e8da612c21a2bb52ce8d67c Happy Learning :)
❤4
Now you can fork the Questions and correct answers yourself for the Exam Website Instruction: 1. Fork the Repo 2. Commit the Changes 3. Send me your fork URL Happy Learning :)
❤3
Signed 𝔖𝔄𝔇
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2👍1
Signed 𝔖𝔄𝔇
issues fixed, some other updates are coming, you can also request changes through the website report button
Signed Hack institute
a former user reported on SecPlus Question number 17 the correct answer is A. Password Spraying due to mistakes i assigned Brute force as the correct answer which is wrong i will be very grateful for anyone reaching out for fixing issues. the issue will be fixed in 3 - 4 business days.
🔥2❤1
Signed Hack institute
The Security+ course from Dion Training will be consistently updated and made available here, without advertisements. However, website maintenance will be discontinued. Source code of SecPlus is for sale @malwaredot
❤3
Signed 𝔖𝔄𝔇
A wide range of Security+ and other cybersecurity-related resources are being shared regularly in our group chat. You are welcome to join us via the following link: 🔗 https://t.me/+ioVttkRtzqIzYjg6 or @hack_institute_chat -------------------- يتم مشاركة مجموعة واسعة من الموارد المتعلقة بشهادة Security+ وغيرها من مواضيع الأمن السيبراني بشكل منتظم في مجموعة الدردشة الخاصة بنا. نرحب بانضمامكم من خلال الرابط التالي: 🔗 ht…
❤8
It's here🥳 a practice exam interface based on ExamTopics's SY0-701 Dump practice before taking the exam, 457 Questions! URL: SecPlus.Hackinst.cc NOTE: Please Report bugs in case of wrong answers, and help me improve the webpage by rechecking the answers i spent a lot of time validating the answers.
❤15
Congratulations to @Misha_ch01
❤7
😬
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @comptiasec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Complete Course & Exam - Dion Training” (@comptiasec), 2,176 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comptiasec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.