Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الامتحان الوطني الموحد لطب الأسنان - د. نور

Channel

الامتحان الوطني الموحد لطب الأسنان - د. نور

@compexam2016

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,561subscribers

+158 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001441915519
TypeChannel
Username@compexam2016
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/compexam2016

Growth

11,40311,56111,48222 August 2026 — 11,403 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,403 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,404 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,438 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,451 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,460 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,473 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,483 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,485 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,492 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,502 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,503 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,513 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,543 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,561 subscribers22 August 20266 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net +158. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,379–11,585 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 11:5911,561+18
4 Sept 2026, 01:4111,543+30
2 Sept 2026, 17:3311,513+10
1 Sept 2026, 14:0411,503+1
31 Aug 2026, 14:3811,502+10
30 Aug 2026, 15:4711,492+7
29 Aug 2026, 15:1411,485+2
28 Aug 2026, 18:3811,483+10
27 Aug 2026, 17:3611,473+13
26 Aug 2026, 17:1311,460+9
25 Aug 2026, 17:5511,451+13
24 Aug 2026, 19:0311,438+34
23 Aug 2026, 07:0711,404+1
22 Aug 2026, 14:4511,403no change
22 Aug 2026, 14:3011,403first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 11,561 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.271%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held33 (9 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total48,242
Reactions total113
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 25 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8575.2%
🔥2017.7%
👍76.19%
🥰10.885%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 01:38 UTC546 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

جيب كاذب، القياس 7 ملم، والارتباط فقط 1 ملم، إذاً ضخامة. 1- قطع اللثة وهو الخيار الصحيح. 2- الشريحة المزاحة تاجياً في حال انحسار وليس ضخامة. 3- الشريحة مع التنضير لو كان الجيب حقيقي. 4- المزاحة ذروياً لو كان السؤال عن زيادة عرض الملتصقة أو تطويل التاج 5- لا يوجد عيوب عظمية ليتم إعادة تشكيلها ---- اللثة 3 دمشق #دورات_لثة@compexam2016

3

2 Sept 2026, 01:30 UTC486 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

الامتصاص الأفقي هو الشكل الأكثر شيوعاً (دمشق) إصابات المفترق، متعلقة بالأسنان متعددة الجذور بينما الامتصاص الأفقي على أي سن، لذلك لا يمكن. هو E #دورات_لثة@compexam2016

3

2 Sept 2026, 01:28 UTC396 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

1- الشريحة المزاحة تاجياً دون طعم عظمي، مناسبة لو كان السؤال عن صنف أول، نظراً لوجود إمكانية تروية ممتازة لا حاجة لاستخدام الطعم. 2- الشريحة المزاحة تاجياً مع الطعم، مناسبة للصنف الثاني، ومناسبة لكون السن ناب، مزاحة تاجياً لكونه ناب لمنع شد وتوتر المزاحة جانبياً (نظراً لبروز الناب)، ومع طعم لتأمين تروية دموية مضاعفة. 3- المزاحة جانبياً نظراً لكونه ناب ومنطقة تجميلية، وإمكانية حصول مشكلة في موقع المنح يستبعد. 4- لن

2

2 Sept 2026, 01:07 UTC381 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

1- التتراسكلين معالجة كيميائية وليس جراحية وبكل الأحوال ليس للضخامات، وإنما في سياق الالتهاب المعندة كالجائح. 2- الشرائح اللثوية كالـ modified flap technique هي استخدام حديث في حالات الضخامات لأنها تسمح بإغلاق الجرح وحصول شفاء مقصد أول. 3- الطعوم الضامة إجراء لتطعيم اللثة أو تغطية الانحسارات وليس الضخامات. 4- تصنيع اللثة أو هندمة الحواف هو إجراء متمم لقطع اللثة، ولو كان الجواب المكتوب هو قطع اللثة (وليس التصنيع) ك

2 Sept 2026, 00:56 UTC333 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

تحت لثوي، هي المجارف، غريسي وتعديلاتها الـ Ck6 والـ u15 أدوات فوق لثوية هوفريدي اسم الشركة المصنعة للغريسي وتعديلاتها مجرفة الـ ASH مجرفة عظم إذاً هو B دمشق carranza 2024 #دورات_لثة@compexam2016

1🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 00:49 UTC349 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

العامل الأخطر في الانحسار من المذكور هو التفريش الخاطئ والقوى المطبقة من قبل الفرشاة (اللثة 1 دمشق، محاضرة التشخيص). ويعد التفريش الخاطئ هو العامل الأكثر شيوعاً لحصول الانحسار اللثوي The most common cause of gingival recession and the loss of attached gingiva is abrasive and traumatic toothbrushing habits. carranza 2024 هو A #دورات_لثة@compexam2016

1

2 Sept 2026, 00:15 UTC426 viewsread 2 September 2026

ابدأ بحل أسئلة دورة 8/1/2026 كنت قد حذفت الحل سابقاً لإعادة التاكد من كامل المصادر أبدأ باللثة

1 Sept 2026, 23:21 UTC557 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

الآفات اللثوية الحادة: الخراجات اللثوية، المرض حول السني التموتي، والآفات اللبية-اللثوية المشتركة لدقة أعلى راجع الموقع. --------- ورشة العمل العالمية المشتركة لتصنيف أمراض وحالات النسج حول السنية وما حول الزرعات السنية (AAP / EFP World Workshop Consensus 2017/2018). #لثة@compexam2016

4

30 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC≈1,380 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

في حال لديك أي سؤال دورة أو فقرة تريد مني شرحها سواء كان السؤال أو الفقرة خلافية أو غيره .. اترك ما تريد وما شئت على هذا المنشور بالتعلقيات https://www.facebook.com/groups/comp.exam.2016/posts/28168033649548670/

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @compexam2016. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTCAnonymous Poll262 voters

الإجابة هي (غداً أرفق الحل)

  1. A15%
  2. B18%
  3. C10%
  4. D58%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTCAnonymous Poll409 voters

الإجابة هي

  1. A44%
  2. B7%
  3. C13%
  4. D36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

سماعة حكيم الإعلامية
@sma3ah · 59,555
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
سكوب الجامعات الخاصة
@ScopePus · 44,088
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الامتحان الوطني الموحد لطب الأسنان - د. نور” (@compexam2016), 11,561 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/compexam2016.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.