Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

진리 그리고 투자

@competenc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,358subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001815263908
TypeChannel
Username@competenc
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/competenc

Growth

3,3573,3583,357.57 August 2026 — 3,357 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,357 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,358 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,357–3,358 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:063,358+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:303,357no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:123,357first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 3,358 subscribers
Avg views / post
709
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held25 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total17,719
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC248 viewsread 7 August 2026

일단 우량주 몇 종목을 산 다음, 수면제를 먹고 몇 년 동안 푹 자라. #앙드레코스톨라니

7 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC387 viewsread 7 August 2026

아무것도 하지 않는 것이 미덕인데.. 절대 노는 것이 아닌데.. 사고 팔아야 된다고 생각을 합니다.

7 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC398 viewsread 7 August 2026

저는 골키퍼입니다. 움직여야 할까요? 아니면 가만히 있어도 될까요? 가만히 있다가 골을 먹으면 욕을 먹습니다. 중간으로 골을 차더라도 골키퍼는 왼쪽 또는 오른쪽으로 멋지게 뛰어야 합니다. 투자자도 자꾸 사고 팔아야 돈을 번다고 생각하기 쉽습니다. 그런데 진짜 부자는 좋은 주식을 사서 끝까지 팔지 않은 사람입니다. 문제는 두 가지. 첫째, 좋은 주식을 사지 못하는 나의 인사이트. 둘째, 조금만 수익이 나면 팔아 버리는 나의 조바심. 그런데 잘 생각해봅시다. 진짜 좋은 걸 잘 샀으면. 그걸 왜 파는거죠?

7 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC295 viewsread 7 August 2026

어떤 회사에 투자하고 싶다면 그 주식을 산 뒤 아무것도 하지 않을 자세가 되어 있어야 합니다. #로젠필드

6 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC663 viewsread 7 August 2026

이익의 질이 의심스러운 기업: - 최근 몇 년 동안 반복해서 이익을 수정한 기업: 이는 분식 회계를 알려주는 신호가 될 수 있다. - 내부 투자 대신 기업 인수를 통한 성장: 기업 인수를 통해서 성장하는 기업은 (구조 조정 비용 등) 일회성 비용과 (영업권 상각 등) 비현금 비용이 많아서 EPS의 신뢰도가 낮다. - 스톡옵션 부여나 일회성 거래 이익이 많은 기업: 스톡옵션이 많으면 EPS 예측이 매우 어렵고, 일회성 거래 이익이 많으면 '정상 이익'을 파악하기 어렵다. #다모다란의투자전략바이블

5 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC865 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

너도나도 실거주를 하겠다고 하면 전월세 이슈가 커질텐데...

4 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC485 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sunstudy1234

https://m.blog.naver.com/soyoung8lee/224367738120

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @competenc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 778,930 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“진리 그리고 투자” (@competenc), 3,358 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/competenc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.