Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ComNews Group

@comnewsgroup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,846subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001105147750
TypeChannel
Username@comnewsgroup
Created3 February 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/comnewsgroup

Growth

2,8462,8492,847.56 August 2026 — 2,849 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,849 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,846 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,846–2,849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 23:332,846-3
6 Aug 2026, 05:062,849no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:102,849first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 2,846 subscribers
Avg views / post
356
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.214%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total7,119
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
133.3%
🔥133.3%
🤣133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC239 viewsread 7 August 2026

Data-ин­фраструк­ту­ра лишь 20% субъ­ек­тов КИИ го­това для вы­пол­не­ния тре­бова­ний но­вого за­кона об ис­кусс­твен­ном ин­тел­лек­те (ИИ). 55% ком­па­ний нуж­на до­работ­ка су­щес­твую­щих сис­тем и под­хо­дов, а 25% пот­ре­бует­ся их зна­читель­ная тран­сфор­ма­ция. https://www.comnews.ru/content/246734/2026-08-05/2026-w32/1008/ne-vse-subekty-kii-gotovy-k-zakonu-ob-ii

5 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC246 viewsread 7 August 2026

"Рус­ская Ме­диаг­руп­па" (РМГ) осенью 2026 г. вы­ведет на ры­нок self-serve‑плат­фор­му "Ох­ват­ный циф­ро­вой". Сер­вис обе­щает рек­ла­мода­телям еди­ный ин­вен­тарь из бо­лее чем 150 циф­ро­вых стан­ций, проз­рач­ную ста­тис­ти­ку и ИИ‑ана­лити­ку. В пер­вый год (с 1 сен­тяб­ря 2026 г. по 1 сен­тяб­ря 2027 г.) плат­фор­ма мо­жет при­нес­ти око­ло 5% от вы­руч­ки хол­дин­га. https://www.comnews.ru/content/246736/

5 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC230 viewsread 7 August 2026

Рос­сий­ские бан­ки спас­ли при­мер­но 1,9 трлн руб. клиен­тов от мо­шен­ни­ков за вто­рой квар­тал 2026 г., а об­щее ко­личес­тво мо­шен­ни­чес­ких опе­раций сок­ра­тилось на 7,5% и сос­та­вило 458,7 тыс. Об­щая сум­ма по­терь клиен­тов бан­ков так­же упа­ла до 7,4 млрд руб., а вы­сокая ин­тен­сив­ность атак на юр­ли­ца сох­ра­нилась. https://www.comnews.ru/content/246735/2026-08-05/2026-w32/1008/banki-rossii-spasl

5 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC218 viewsread 7 August 2026

В 2025 г. мо­шен­ни­чес­тво с ис­поль­зо­ванием дип­фей­ков в Рос­сии вы­рос­ло в 2,3 ра­за. 92% рес­пон­ден­тов счи­тают, что спу­финг (под­ме­на) на ос­но­ве дип­фей­ков пред­став­ляет реаль­ную уг­ро­зу для биз­не­са, а 21% оп­ро­шен­ных приз­на­ли, что их ком­па­нии уже пос­тра­дали от мо­шен­ни­чес­тва с при­мене­нием ис­кусс­твен­но­го ин­тел­лек­та (ИИ). https://www.comnews.ru/content/246733/2026-08-05/2026-w

4 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC268 viewsread 7 August 2026

По­дав­ляю­щее боль­шинс­тво Java-раз­ра­бот­чи­ков в Рос­сии ис­поль­зуют в ра­боте ИИ-инс­тру­мен­ты, а боль­ше по­лови­ны - об­ра­щают­ся к ним ежед­нев­но. Ча­ще все­го ис­кусс­твен­ный ин­тел­лект по­могает в поис­ке ин­фор­ма­ции, и для мно­гих раз­ра­бот­чи­ков он за­менил плат­фор­му воп­ро­сов и от­ве­тов Stack Overflow. https://www.comnews.ru/content/246715/2026-08-04/2026-w32/1008/okolo-95-java-razrabotch

4 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC261 viewsread 7 August 2026

Муж­чи­на пы­тал­ся взыс­кать ком­пен­са­цию у пред­при­нима­теля за ис­поль­зо­вание изоб­ра­жений, ко­торые соз­дал с по­мощью ис­кусс­твен­но­го ин­тел­лек­та. Ис­тец счи­тает, что это объ­ект ав­тор­ско­го пра­ва. Од­на­ко Прес­нен­ский рай­он­ный суд Мос­квы не пос­чи­тал изоб­ра­жения ис­тца твор­чес­твом. Ус­той­чи­вая прак­ти­ка по та­ким де­лам по­ка не сфор­ми­рова­лась. https://www.comnews.ru/content/2467

4 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC265 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ФАС Рос­сии воз­бу­дила де­ло в от­но­шении Apple за неис­пол­не­ние ра­нее вы­дан­но­го пред­пи­сания о необ­хо­димос­ти пре­дус­та­нов­ки на ус­трой­ствах iOS на­цио­наль­но­го мес­сен­дже­ра Max и оте­чес­твен­но­го ма­гази­на при­ложе­ний RuStore. Юрис­ты от­ме­чают, что в слу­чае сис­те­мати­чес­ко­го неис­пол­не­ния су­деб­ных тре­бова­ний Apple мо­жет стол­кнуть­ся с пол­ным зап­ре­том на про­дажу про­дук­ции

🤣1

4 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 7 August 2026

Во вто­ром ком­мер­чес­ком за­пус­ке ком­па­нии "Бю­ро 1440", сос­тояв­шем­ся 19 июля 2026 г., ока­залось 16 спут­ни­ков. Толь­ко что их иден­ти­фици­ровал ка­талог NORAD. Что­бы вы­пол­нить це­левые по­каза­тели фед­проек­та "Ин­фраструк­ту­ра дос­ту­па в ин­тер­нет", до кон­ца го­да "Бю­ро 1440" нуж­но вы­вес­ти на низ­кую ор­би­ту еще 125 кос­ми­чес­ких ап­па­ратов - для че­го пот­ре­буют­ся семь пус­ков. https:/

3 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC311 viewsread 7 August 2026

Объ­ем рос­сий­ско­го рын­ка IaaS в 2026 г. дос­тиг­нет 117 млрд руб., а в 2030 г. вы­рас­тет до 241 млрд руб. Сред­не­годо­вой рост сос­та­вит око­ло 20%. 26% рос­сий­ских ком­па­ний пла­нируют уве­личить бюд­жет на IaaS. Сок­ра­тить тра­ты на­мере­ны лишь 6%. https://www.comnews.ru/content/246690/2026-08-03/2026-w32/1008/rossiyskiy-rynok-iaas-prodolzhit-rasti

3 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC300 viewsread 7 August 2026

Объ­ем рын­ка пуб­лич­ной об­лач­ной ин­фраструк­ту­ры (IaaS) в Рос­сии в 2025 г. дос­тиг 96 млрд руб., а к 2030 г. вы­рас­тет до 241 млрд руб. Глав­ный кри­терий вы­бора про­вай­де­ра - на­деж­ность (72%), а ос­нов­ным драй­ве­ром рос­та ста­новит­ся ИИ: бо­лее 80% ком­па­ний от­ме­чают его влия­ние на пот­реб­ле­ние ре­сур­сов. https://www.comnews.ru/content/246689/2026-08-03/2026-w32/1008/k-2030-g-rynok-oblakov-p

3 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC300 viewsread 7 August 2026

Мос­ква и Мос­ков­ская об­ласть по­пол­ни­ли спи­сок ре­гио­нов, в ко­торых зап­ре­щен май­нинг крип­то­валю­ты до 31 де­каб­ря 2032 г. Пра­витель­ство Рос­сии опуб­ли­кова­ло соот­ветс­твую­щее пос­та­нов­ле­ние. https://www.comnews.ru/content/246687/2026-08-03/2026-w32/1008/maynit-moskve-nelzya

3 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC307 viewsread 7 August 2026

Из-за слож­ной це­поч­ки пос­ред­ни­ков и сме­ны элит обо­рудо­вание опе­ратив­но-тех­но­логи­чес­кой и дис­пет­чер­ской свя­зи на 442 же­лез­но­дорож­ных стан­циях АО "НК "Қазақстан темір жо­лы" (КТЖ) с 2026 г. ли­шилось и об­слу­жива­ния, и тех­под­дер­жки. Это кри­тичес­ки по­вышает рис­ки вне­зап­ных от­ка­зов се­ти, дли­тель­ных прос­тоев и по­тери дан­ных, что мо­жет от­ра­зить­ся на неп­ре­рыв­нос­ти произ­вод

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @comnewsgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 390,062 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ComNews Group” (@comnewsgroup), 2,846 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comnewsgroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.