3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 912–913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 18:05
912
-1
9 Aug 2026, 16:22
913
no change
9 Aug 2026, 13:32
913
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
46.1%
avg views ÷ 912 subscribers
Avg views / post
421
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (17 June 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
841
Reactions total
49
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
243 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
135
55.6%
🔥
45
18.5%
👏
20
8.23%
🕊
11
4.53%
🙏
11
4.53%
👾
6
2.47%
🤝
4
1.65%
✍
3
1.23%
👌
3
1.23%
😍
2
0.823%
🤗
2
0.823%
😢
1
0.412%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Родительское выгорание: комментарии членов НПОПУз в новом материале Hook!
В издании Hook! вышел разбор темы родительского выгорания с комментариями членов нашего общества.
В материале разбирают мифы о «простой усталости» и смотрят на проблему системно: от «второй смены» и менеджерской нагрузки на женщин до личного баланса ресурсов.
Ценим участие наших специалистов в создании доказательных и важных материалов для СМ…
Добрый день, сообщество! ☀️
Сегодня продолжаем знакомство с членами Научно-практического общества психологов Узбекистана в рубрике #лица_нпопуз #vakkillar
Знакомьтесь:
Цой Светлана Валерьевна — старший преподаватель кафедры психологии Ташкентского филиала МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова, психолог в CAU, консультирующий психолог.
Светлана Валерьевна окончила филиал МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова в г. Ташкент бакалавриат и маги…
📸 Ловим моменты из жизни Научно-практического общества!
Благодарим Лиану Натрошвили за глубокий и практико-ориентированный разбор темы, а участников — за активное обсуждение, вопросы и профессиональный диалог.
Спасибо всем, кто был с нами — очно и онлайн! 💻
Отзывы о мероприятии:
Благодарна Лиане за структурированную информацию по теме и подсвеченные моменты информированного согласия. Очень полезная встреча!
–Ишхан…
Aziz-Kariyeva Madina Timurovna — oliy ma‘lumotli psixolog, o‘qituvchi, O‘zbekiston Psixologlari ilmiy-amaliy jamiyati a’zosi.
E’tiboringizda #лица_нпопуз #vakillar rukni!
🫂12 yildan ortiq vaqt davomida Aziz-Kariyeva Madina Timurovna biznes sohasida faoliyat yuritib kelmoqda. Bugungi kunda esa o‘z ilmiy izlanishlarini sport psixologiyasi yo‘nalishida olib bormoqda. Avtomobil sanoati, qurilish, investitsiyalar, loyih…
За каждым профессиональным сообществом стоят люди👥
Научно-практическое общество психологов Узбекистана объединяет сотни специалистов с разным опытом, направлениями работы и профессиональным путём.
В рубрике #лица_нпопуз #vakillar мы постепенно знакомим вас с учредителями и членами Общества.
🔵Каждая история — это возможность узнать больше о человеке, его профессиональном опыте, интересах, ценностях и вкладе в психол…
Быть психологом — не значит всё время быть сильным.
Иногда после сессий остаётся усталость, тревога, сомнения или ощущение, что всё приходится выдерживать одному.
«Я и моя практика» — терапевтическая группа для психологов, которые проводят члены нашего Общества. Где будут говорить о себе, своей работе, сложностях, чувствах и поиске опоры в профессии.
Темы работы:
🟠страх начать практику
🟠 выгорание
🟠страх ошибок и о…
Hurmatli hamkasblar!💌
Уважаемые коллеги!
Sizga o‘zgarishlar haqida ma’lum qilamiz: juma kungi seminar soat 12:00 da bo‘lib o‘tadi.
📏📏📏📏📏📏📏
Сообщаем об изменениях, семинар в пятницу пройдет 12:00
Balint guruhi: u superviziya va interviziyadan nimasi bilan farq qiladi hamda nega yordam beruvchi mutaxassislar uchun muhim?
`
🗓10-iyul
🕜12:00
Onlayn seminar: qisqa ma’ruza, muhokama va amaliy Balint guruhi.
Uchrashuvda Balint guruhi nima ekanligi, uning superviziya va interviziyadan farqi, psixologlar, pedagoglar, talabalar hamda boshqa yordam beruvchi kasb egalari uchun o‘ziga xos ahamiyati haqida suhbatlashamiz.…
Балинтовская группа: чем она отличается от супервизии и зачем нужна помогающим специалистам.
🗓10-июля
🕜12:00
Онлайн-семинар с практической частью: короткая лекция, обсуждение и проведение балинтовской группы.
На встрече мы поговорим о том, что такое балинтовская группа, чем она отличается от супервизии и интервизии, в чём её уникальность и ценность для психологов, преподавателей, студентов и специалистов других помог…
So‘rovnomada ishtirok etgan barchaga rahmat.👍
Javoblarga qaraganda, tajribasidan qat’i nazar, ko‘plab psixologlar nafaqat «mijoz bilan nima qilish kerak?» degan savolga, balki «bu paytda men bilan nima sodir bo‘lyapti?» degan savolga ham duch kelishadi.
Aynan shu haqda 10-iyul kuni Balint guruhlariga bag‘ishlangan onlayn uchrashuvda suhbatlashamiz.
📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏
Спасибо всем, кто принял участие в опросе!♥️
Судя по отв…
🔵Что чаще всего становится для вас профессиональным вызовом?
Когда не понимаю, как дальше работать с клиентом.49%
Когда случай эмоционально долго не отпускает.27%
Когда начинаю сомневаться в себе как в специалисте.33%
Когда хочется поделиться, но не с кем обсудить сложный случай.31%
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🟠Siz uchun kasbiy faoliyatda eng ko‘p qaysi holat qiyinchilik tug‘diradi?
Mijoz bilan keyin qanday ishlashni tushunmay qolganimda.30%
Holat meni hissiy jihatdan uzoq vaqt qo‘yib yubormaganida.33%
O‘zimga mutaxassis sifatida shubha qila boshlaganimda.27%
Bo‘lishgim keladi, lekin murakkab holatni muhokama qilishga hech kim bo‘lmaganda.33%
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @community_uz_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔵Что чаще всего становится для вас профессиональным вызовом?
Когда не понимаю, как дальше работать с клиентом.49%
Когда случай эмоционально долго не отпускает.27%
Когда начинаю сомневаться в себе как в специалисте.33%
Когда хочется поделиться, но не с кем обсудить сложный случай.31%
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🟠Siz uchun kasbiy faoliyatda eng ko‘p qaysi holat qiyinchilik tug‘diradi?
Mijoz bilan keyin qanday ishlashni tushunmay qolganimda.30%
Holat meni hissiy jihatdan uzoq vaqt qo‘yib yubormaganida.33%
O‘zimga mutaxassis sifatida shubha qila boshlaganimda.27%
Bo‘lishgim keladi, lekin murakkab holatni muhokama qilishga hech kim bo‘lmaganda.33%
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сегодня вопрос практикующим психологам👨⚕️
Используете ли вы в работе с клиентами информированное согласие?
Да34%
Нет8%
Иногда использую9%
Что это такое?14%
Я не практик, но хочу подсмотреть ответы👀39%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,096,514 of 1,570,450entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психологи РУз | Научно-практическое общество | НПОПУз” (@community_uz_psy), 912 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/community_uz_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.