Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Communism Kills

@communismkills

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,132subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001252204275
TypeChannel
Username@communismkills
Created17 June 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/communismkills

Growth

3,1323,1473,139.56 August 2026 — 3,147 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,147 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,146 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,141 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,132 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,130–3,149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:143,132-9
10 Aug 2026, 09:213,141-5
7 Aug 2026, 07:103,146-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:013,147no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:473,147first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,191 reactions across 19 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯26222.0%
😁25721.6%
🌚1018.48%
998.31%
👍806.72%
🫡776.47%
🎉594.95%
🔥514.28%
🌭312.60%
🙏312.60%
👀231.93%
🦄231.93%
🍾221.85%
🤪100.84%
💩90.756%
🕊90.756%
🥱60.504%
👻50.42%
🤮50.42%
👎40.336%
12 further kinds272.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,191reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2024 to 15 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Sept 2025, 03:10 UTC≈3,030 views139 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

84🙏31🕊9💩5🤮4🖕2🤡2🤣2

30 Dec 2024, 16:36 UTC≈6,610 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

500 days of being right (meta posting)

🫡75👍114💩4🔥4🍾1

15 Jul 2024, 21:43 UTC≈8,660 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Try now lol

🍾21👍6🌚3🔥3🤷‍♀2🖕1

15 Jul 2024, 21:39 UTC≈7,840 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I think I fixed the setting that prevented people from sharing my posts.

🦄22🌚4👍4👎4

13 Jul 2024, 22:47 UTC≈7,310 views110 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Remember, half the country thinks what just happened to Trump is a good thing, most implicitly, some explicitly. Why do you think you can live peacefully with them?

💯81🔥15👍7🥱4😍2🤔1

11 Jun 2024, 03:43 UTC≈5,720 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I’ve been back on Twitter for less than a month.

😁72🤪10🌚3🌭3🫡2😭21👏1

11 May 2024, 07:57 UTC≈6,030 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Although I am glad to have my Twitter back, I don’t actually anticipate using it much. There’s so much less noise to filter through here.

🌭26👍19💯98🗿1

11 May 2024, 04:36 UTC≈5,340 views84 reactionsread 7 August 2026

4 years. https://twitter.com/Communism_Kills/status/1789150636790985075

🎉59👍6💯6🌚4🔥4🌭2👏2🦄1

18 Mar 2024, 16:59 UTC≈6,810 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026

If your politics change because of who is personally nice to you, you probably didn't have many principles to begin with.

💯90👍6🏆2🤣1

18 Mar 2024, 16:59 UTC≈5,770 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026

So Rob Smith disappeared for months, just to come back and whine some more about how he didn't get enough 15 minutes of fame from conservatives, but those liberals are, shucks, just so nice to him. And, wow, coincidentally, he's no longer on the Trump train and isn't considering himself conservative anymore! Shocker! 🤯

😁44🌚18

18 Mar 2024, 16:58 UTC≈5,360 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Wow, who could've predicted a man whose brand was being a gay black "conservative," who wrote an opinion column for CNN about how horrible the death of Trayvon Martin was, would go crawling to CNN for approval the moment someone on the right said a mean word to him? It's almost like this was always the plan all along and everyone knew this. And now he's buckling down, months later, to try to get that CNN position f

😁40🌚23👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @communismkills. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 930,301 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Communism Kills” (@communismkills), 3,132 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/communismkills.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.