Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Commode Ӏ Хранители времени

Channel

Commode Ӏ Хранители времени

@commodevintage

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

12,930subscribers

+43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693846573
TypeChannel
Username@commodevintage
DescriptionИщем истории, достойные продолжения. Подбор по году, смыслу, событию. Официальный аккаунт-менеджер @commodevtg Чат-бот: @LordeCommodeBot Сайт: commodevintage.com
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/commodevintage

Growth

12,88012,93012,9057 August 2026 — 12,887 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,887 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,885 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,880 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,888 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,897 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,902 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,895 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,911 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,912 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,910 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,914 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,918 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,930 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 16 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,873–12,938 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 04:3612,930+12
21 Aug 2026, 19:2612,918+4
20 Aug 2026, 19:4612,914+4
19 Aug 2026, 18:4412,910-2
17 Aug 2026, 16:5612,912+1
16 Aug 2026, 14:0512,911+16
14 Aug 2026, 19:1412,895-7
13 Aug 2026, 11:1612,902+5
12 Aug 2026, 12:2312,897+9
11 Aug 2026, 14:4212,888+8
10 Aug 2026, 15:3612,880-5
9 Aug 2026, 14:1712,885-2
8 Aug 2026, 13:4312,887no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:4512,887first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 12,930 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held48 (4 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total87,050
Reactions total1,341
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,490
Videos
329
Links
251

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,341 reactions across 48 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
75656.4%
😍15511.6%
🔥13910.4%
💘967.16%
❤‍🔥503.73%
👍413.06%
👏342.54%
💯161.19%
🤩141.04%
😱130.969%
🕊90.671%
70.522%
🎉50.373%
💔40.298%
🍓10.075%
💋10.075%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,341reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,050 views10 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4🔥2😍2👏1💘1

22 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,040 views5 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Решили показать вживую!

2🔥2👍1

22 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,110 views15 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Vendôme 1988 года. Новая жизнь классической формы от Cartier Вчера мы показывали вам юбилейные Colisée, а сегодня — графичная классика Vendôme. Модель Vendôme появилась еще в 1973 году. Она — замечательный пример часовой классики. Золотой корпус с гладким безелем и сдержанная графика циферблата создают тот самый безошибочно узнаваемый стиль Cartier. Часы 1988 года в полном архивном комплекте и в прекрасном состоя

10💘3👏2

21 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,430 views26 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Удивительная пантера: сумка Cartier Panthere в апельсиновом цвете Традиционно Cartier работает со строгой, сдержанной палитрой — черный, бордовый, коричневый. Именно поэтому наша сегодняшняя находка в смелом ярко-оранжевом цвете настолько необычна. При этом силуэт сумки остается узнаваемо мягким и текучим — округлая ручка, плавная линия корпуса, уверенная форма и неизменная пантера в качестве застежки. Комплект аб

13😍7💘4🔥2

21 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,520 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

Редкая юбилейная версия Colisée — и повод показать ее ближе. В движении заметно то, что не всегда считывается на фото: глубину гильоше и мягкий блеск золота.

11👍4💘3🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,550 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Уникальные Colisée 1997 года, отмеченные историей: 150 лет Cartier В наших руках редкое юбилейное исполнение Cartier Colisée. Та самая модель модель, выпущенная в честь 150-летия Дома. Циферблат с тончайшим гильошированным узором дополнен особенностью именно этой линии — рубиновым кабашоном на заводной головке. Всего 1847 экземпляров на мир, — этот под номером 814. 550 000 рублей / 6600$ SOLD В коллекцию @commode

13👏3🔥2💘1

20 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,710 views20 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Дебютная глава часовой истории Chanel. Архивный комплект Première Название этих часов не случайно, ведь именно они стали первым шагом Chanel в мире часового искусства. Глубокий черный циферблат, золото корпуса и плетение браслета — все это не просто детали, а осознанная преемственность дизайна. По-прежнему пользующиеся неизменной популярностью Chanel Première — в полном комплекте со всеми оригинальными документам

10😱4😍3💘1🔥1🤩1

20 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,820 views32 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Классический код Chanel. Classic Flap 1996 - 1997 годов Сегодня — два знаковых образа Chanel. Классический образ и его интерпретация в часовом искусстве. Черная кожа, мягкая геометрия стежки, золотистая фурнитура и цепь, переплетенная кожей — перед нами Classic Flap, узнаваемая с первого взгляда. Размер Jumbo делает эту модель особенно удобной для дневного использования — вместительная, но при этом сохраняющая ту

20😍6🔥5💘1

19 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,930 views31 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Бессмертный черный крокодил из 1988-го, Kelly 32 Следующим — еще одна версия Kelly 32 Porosus, на этот раз в классическом черном цвете. Черный в этой коже звучит иначе. Вместо ярких переливов — глубина и графическая четкость чешуи. Золотая фурнитура идеально дополняет композицию добавляя контраст, при этом сохраняя строгость. Сумка 1988 года из кожи крокодила в идеальном состоянии — нечастая находка даже для нас!

167😍5💘2👍1

19 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,930 views38 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

По секрету: если у вас зеленое настроение, дополнить его можно таким фантастическим изумрудным сетом Piaget из 90-х!

19😍7❤‍🔥4💔4💘3🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC≈2,020 views31 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Архивная экзотика в зеленом из 1995 года. Редчайшая Hermès Kelly 32 в коже Porosus Среди всех экзотических материалов Hermès, крокодил Porosus — один из наиболее ценных и редких. Первая сегодняшняя находка — особенно яркий пример этой кожи: насыщенный, бархатный зеленый тон подчеркивает тонкую симметрию чешуи и ее мягкий естественный блеск. Полный комплект и прекрасное состояние — исключительная сохранность для су

20😱6😍4💘1

18 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈2,050 views41 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Золотая ткань Piaget — эстетика 1970-х Еще одна прекрасная находка, теперь уже из 1970-х. Образец фирменного плетения Piaget, ставшего визитной карточкой дома. Ювелиры вручную скручивали тончайшую золотую нить вокруг миниатюрных штифтов, а на один браслет уходило до 600 соединений. В результате драгоценный металл на глазах превращается в настоящую ткань, рукотворное чудо, замаскированное под текстиль. 1 300 000 р

😍2112🔥7💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @commodevintage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@commodevintage edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 397,203 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Commode Ӏ Хранители времени” (@commodevintage), 12,930 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/commodevintage.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.