Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Comitato Ascoltami

@comitatoascoltami

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,014subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725196738
TypeChannel
Username@comitatoascoltami
DescriptionCanale ufficiale del Comitato Ascoltami
Created30 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/comitatoascoltami

Growth

17,01417,02517,019.56 August 2026 — 17,025 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,025 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,023 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,022 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,020 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,018 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,016 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,014 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,012–17,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 18:3217,014-2
10 Aug 2026, 17:4117,016-2
9 Aug 2026, 20:3817,018-2
8 Aug 2026, 17:4117,020-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:5217,022-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:5617,023-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:5217,025no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4417,025first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 2 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.0%
avg views ÷ 17,014 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,740
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (2 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total11,230
Reactions total221
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,340
Videos
103
Links
644

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,398 reactions across 21 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
53638.3%
👍45832.8%
🤬14910.7%
👏1107.87%
👎302.15%
😢271.93%
💔171.22%
🔥151.07%
😈130.93%
🙏110.787%
😭100.715%
🏆50.358%
🤯40.286%
😱30.215%
🤷‍♀30.215%
🥰20.143%
🥴20.143%
😡10.072%
🤡10.072%
🤣10.072%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,398reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈2,070 views89 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Nell’audizione in Commissione Covid, Giuseppe Conte ha parlato di un “patto” tra governo e popolazione. Ma il testo dell’articolo riporta una frase precisa: «La popolazione ha condiviso un patto proposto dal governo accettando di assoggettarsi alle restrizioni». Assoggettarsi. Una parola che pesa. Perché durante la pandemia non ci fu un confronto libero e sereno. Ci furono divieti, paura, multe, chiusure, autocer

👍5114🔥10👏7🤬7

25 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC≈3,910 views79 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bellavite in Commissione Covid: “Non si può dimenticare chi si è fidato e ha subito un danno” Nell’audizione del professor Paolo Bellavite, già docente all’Università di Verona, è stato affrontato uno dei nodi più importanti di tutta la vicenda vaccinale: la conoscenza, la registrazione e il riconoscimento degli eventi avversi. 📌 Qui il link al post con video e nostro commento: 👉 https://www.facebook.com/ComitatoAs

59👍10🏆5👏3🥴2

16 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC≈5,250 views53 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://lanuovabq.it/it/neuropatia-delle-piccole-fibre-il-male-oscuro-post-vaccino-ignorato

34🤬16😱3

3 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC≈6,490 views93 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://lanuovabq.it/it/va-bene-conte-ma-draghi-serve-una-svolta-sulle-indagini-in-pandemia

👍67👏18🤬52🤣1

2 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC≈11,200 views51 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Quando a Genova venne programmata la proiezione del documentario Invisibili, dedicato alle testimonianze dei danneggiati da vaccino, Matteo Bassetti chiese che il Comune non desse l’autorizzazione, parlando di “fake news”. Oggi, in Commissione Covid, gli è stato chiesto conto di quell’episodio. 👉🏻 Qui il link al post con video e nostro commento: https://www.facebook.com/ComitatoAscoltami/posts/pfbid022bCiEXFeU3MaYC

👎2912👍6🥰2😈2

27 Jun 2026, 05:43 UTC≈4,930 views84 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://lanuovabq.it/it/ministero-condannato-verita-a-galla-sui-danni-da-vaccino

👏697😢5👍3

24 Jun 2026, 15:08 UTC≈9,160 views70 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

In Commissione Covid è stato ascoltato Maurizio Federico, dirigente di ricerca presso l’Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Un’audizione importante perché, questa volta, non si è parlato dei danneggiati come di un problema “esterno”, ma di ciò che emerge anche dall’interno della ricerca pubblica italiana. Il passaggio più forte riguarda lo Stato. «Se i danneggiati dai vaccini sono stati 100, sono stati 1000, sono stati

👍4822

24 Jun 2026, 11:14 UTC≈4,130 views50 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @AndreaZambranoNews

L'ISS si è autocensurato per tacere i danni da vaccino - La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana https://lanuovabq.it/it/liss-si-e-autocensurato-per-tacere-i-danni-da-vaccino

32👍16🔥1🤡1

13 Jun 2026, 13:49 UTC≈10,500 views69 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Quando una persona racconta di stare male dopo una vaccinazione, la prima risposta non dovrebbe essere la derisione. Dovrebbe essere l’ascolto. Kikò Nalli, ospite a La Volta Buona, ha raccontato: «A mezzogiorno ho fatto la puntura, alle tre non stavo più in piedi». Ha spiegato di essere finito in sedia a rotelle per due mesi dopo l’ultima dose anti-Covid, precisando anche di avere già problemi di schiena. Secondo

40👍14😭10🤯4🙏1

5 Jun 2026, 14:15 UTC≈12,300 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

In Commissione Covid è stato ascoltato Paolo Vineis, ordinario di Epidemiologia ambientale all’Imperial College di Londra. La sua non è stata un’audizione di rottura: Vineis ha ribadito di ritenere efficaci i vaccini e le misure non farmacologiche. Proprio per questo, però, assumono particolare peso alcuni passaggi critici emersi durante il confronto. 👉🏻 Qui il link al post con video e nostro commento: https://www.

👍20

29 May 2026, 15:47 UTC≈11,500 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

In Commissione Covid è stato ascoltato Giovanni Rezza, già direttore generale della Prevenzione del Ministero della Salute. Tra i molti temi affrontati, due passaggi meritano particolare attenzione. Il primo riguarda l’efficacia del vaccino contro l’infezione. Il secondo passaggio riguarda invece l’immunità naturale. 👉🏻 Qui il link al post con video e nostro commento: https://www.facebook.com/ComitatoAscoltami/post

38👍7

21 May 2026, 14:03 UTC≈11,300 views62 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

In Commissione Covid si è tornati a parlare dei minori. L’audizione del dottor Eugenio Serravalle ha messo al centro un punto delicatissimo: la campagna vaccinale anti-Covid rivolta a bambini e adolescenti. Secondo quanto esposto, nei più giovani il rischio legato al virus era molto basso; eppure anche loro sono stati coinvolti in una strategia vaccinale di massa, accompagnata da restrizioni pesanti, Super Green Pa

47😈11🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @comitatoascoltami. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 860,586 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Comitato Ascoltami” (@comitatoascoltami), 17,014 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comitatoascoltami.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.