Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ℋ𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘺.’ (슬픔)

@comfhelly

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

29subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002593599066
TypeChannel
Username@comfhelly
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/comfhelly

Growth

2912 Aug 2026, 12:16 — 29 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 10:14 — 29 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 12:1613 Aug 2026, 10:14
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:1429no change
12 Aug 2026, 12:1629first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53482512244015390371820.7%
custom 52153405966836333231719.5%
custom 52624891327514167011416.1%
custom 530779665685756315289.20%
custom 532110041684118385989.20%
custom 542501679838058167889.20%
custom 528078264830056768778.05%
custom 521346697733028642055.75%
🌚22.30%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2025 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Dec 2025, 02:55 UTC90 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

➿ всем привеет этот канал закрывается, так как я решила уйти из соло. мне не нравятся мои навыки, + времени на то, чтобы активно вести канал, нет. 🌟 🎀 спасибо всем. кстати канал даже года не прожил.🎀

6 Dec 2025, 16:54 UTC162 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

хотите нью эру?

  1. да74%
  2. не26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52153405966836333231custom 52624891327514167011

6 Dec 2025, 16:53 UTC152 viewsread 12 August 2026

хотите я вам нью эру забабахаю? 🥰

19 Nov 2025, 18:01 UTC122 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

ׁ 歳ׁ 🆘ew 🤩ractice ! 🎁 - 🎀 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘤𝘦 🦕 lo^e c a n ’ t hear m y voices ‘🎀 🔮 voices 🐈‍⬛ (orig. by Stray Kids) ℋ𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘺.’ (슬픔) 🫂 無関心 🌟 🤍cover by H E L L Y .🎁 🍹 step out of that voices . — ➖➿ —➖➿ —➖➿ — ➖➿ #readyontop @comfhelly #voices

custom 52153405966836333235custom 52807826483005676875custom 53211004168411838595custom 52134669773302864202custom 52624891327514167012custom 54250167983805816782

19 Nov 2025, 18:00 UTC95 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 53482512244015390374custom 53077966568575631523custom 54250167983805816783

9 Nov 2025, 06:00 UTC380 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🤩ew cover?🖤 𝖎’𝖒 𝖆𝖑𝖎𝖛𝖊💗 🧱 song – ɢᴏᴏᴅʙʏᴇ🎁. @comfhelly 🍹. • ภєlllאђєк 🙏— — #rεα∂үσηтσρ🌟 ~ should’ve never sa🤍 goodbye ❕ ➖ 🎁 ⲃ𝕖ⲁ𝕦ⲧⲓϝ𝕦ⳑ 🎇🎀 love your family pls ! ! 👽 things around me have broken me up 🌹 goodbye? ——— ➖ ——— ➖ ———➖ ——— #readyontop #helly #goodbye

custom 52153405966836333239custom 52624891327514167018custom 53482512244015390375custom 54250167983805816783custom 52134669773302864202custom 52807826483005676872custom 53077966568575631522custom 53211004168411838592

19 Oct 2025, 13:35 UTC116 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

спасибо за добавление в краш лист!!

custom 52134669773302864201custom 52153405966836333231custom 52624891327514167011custom 53482512244015390371

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @comfhelly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Dec 2025, 16:54 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

хотите нью эру?

  1. да74%
  2. не26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2025 to 25 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,261,432 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ℋ𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘺.’ (슬픔)” (@comfhelly), 29 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comfhelly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.