Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Combat Footage

@combat_ftg2

Not marked by Telegram, checked 12 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

48,219subscribers

+75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002209028079
TypeChannel
Username@combat_ftg2
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/combat_ftg2

Growth

48,14448,21948,181.57 August 2026 — 48,144 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,158 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,182 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,185 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,195 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,213 subscribers13 August 2026 — 48,219 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,133–48,230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:4748,219+6
12 Aug 2026, 02:4248,213+18
11 Aug 2026, 01:0148,195+10
10 Aug 2026, 03:4148,185+3
9 Aug 2026, 05:0248,182+24
8 Aug 2026, 01:5248,158+14
7 Aug 2026, 14:1548,144first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 48,219 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,800
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (9 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total268,410
Reactions total4,543
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 19s
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,229 reactions across 23 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,52540.5%
🤣1,12118.0%
79012.7%
👍76312.2%
😁4517.24%
🤬3465.55%
🤡1332.14%
👎691.11%
😐310.498%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,229reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 23 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @combat_ftg2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC≈4,310 views168 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

The ruzky are genuinely cosplaying Fury Road but still fail to hit a Ukrainian drone

🤣137👍17🤡104

10 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈6,010 views189 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

This ruzky invader decided to choose a leisurely form of suicide 🤣

🤣110😁36🔥25👍126

8 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC≈8,390 views195 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ukrainian drone evading multiple russian air defence missiles as part of a compilation of russian shadow fleet ships getting disabled. In total, since the beginning of Operation "Molochka," from July 6 to August 8, the SBS units have successfully targeted 218 vessels. Of these, 134 were in the Azov Sea and 84 were in the Black Sea.

🔥13333👍27🤬2

7 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈10,400 views295 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ruzky troglodyte shocked by a swarm of Ukrainian drones in Tula region

🔥175😁51👍3222🤣15

6 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈11,300 views270 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Ukrainian interceptor drone downing a russian fiber-optic FPV with a net launcher

🔥182👍6518👎5

5 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈11,200 views261 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Ukrainian special forces conducting a raid on a russian position

🔥177👍4238😁3👎1

4 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈11,500 views375 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ruzky subhumans targeting a civilian vegetable and fruit seller in Kherson colloquially known as "human safari" in russian circles - google it Luckily the man survived

🤬339👎189🔥6👍3

4 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈10,900 views302 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

The glorious russian air defence made a genius decision to down our drone in Gelendzhik over a beach full of ruzky civilians - a few died and a dozen were injured

🤣209🔥49👎2018😁6

31 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC≈15,000 views358 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ukrainian UGV on its way to resupply troops masterfully evades a russian FPV

210👍100🔥32😁16

27 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC≈20,000 views287 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Ukrainian drone hutner crew playing battlefield in real life while shooting down russian shaheds from an open cockpit of a Yak-52.

🔥184👍5443👎3🤬3

26 Jul 2026, 19:10 UTC≈18,700 views241 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Russian assaulter moving towards his position is caught in a field by a Ukrainian FPV drone team. The Russian appears to accept his fate, and the FPV pilot slowly guides the drone into him.

🔥133😁47😐28👍2112

26 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC≈16,700 views195 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Russian mobile air defense group covering logistic routes

🤣122🤡33👎18🔥157

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @combat_ftg2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTCAnonymous Poll3,020 voters approx.

Is this a real video recording or an AI generated fake?

  1. Real71%
  2. AI29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 560,179 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Denys Davydov
@pilotblog · 201,319
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Combat Footage” (@combat_ftg2), 48,219 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/combat_ftg2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.