Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Wallpapers by Colorwallies

@colorwallies

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,174subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001383536496
TypeChannel
Username@colorwallies
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/colorwallies

Growth

2,1742,1832,178.56 August 2026 — 2,182 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,183 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,178 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,174 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,173–2,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:072,174-4
10 Aug 2026, 18:252,178-5
7 Aug 2026, 08:222,183+1
6 Aug 2026, 09:192,182first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5042.0%
3932.8%
🔥108.40%
😁108.40%
🥰54.20%
🍌21.68%
🎉21.68%
🌚10.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2024 to 15 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2024, 12:08 UTC≈4,630 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

416QB60FKS5EJGDLM3WH03L W190X2GTSVMLA3YANSUTC4K DPT8V95LSAEZJZC7ZZ04EKJ XBHSEJY1VLZJL5LVD5CBA9F M2EZM5SP9LEC2FCUH11M83E

👍4

15 Jul 2024, 08:42 UTC≈4,770 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

XEREBAC1X791QVYWGHWFHJJ CBR8J4YSN0VLUA2GH8YZK8S 2GWBG19KU2V6C0MKGPYCSL0 NBT7HVC4Z0M5AWEX9X2XF8L 14KYXDZ8R39ALNWR2PKR1MV GWAA1BXZXGBGMPPK6URS3XZ RV394V89N812X0HDELBVSQ9 8GKKKGS3FFDHR33V0R9V0MR D1PXZQ2WXKXUZ3YEGHYJKF4 9SENL95C2SFH83V3BMN3F0P

👍72

15 Jul 2024, 08:29 UTC≈4,470 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Lavien Adaptive Shady Dark Icons 03H3B0B7PSSZAZ03SJ42PGL V7P52ES2T58835HWBVHMS3Q THA9U9NRXDX9ZXM9TRAVTSP ZRV068YNTFF8V524D0UTT9B 7HC1M2TLE078VTCW1V8ZYZ3 MXTXHRML8NKBXD2JAAHL3F8 DJ19QUQGYTW4G3DGM3ZHCM2 B8RP4VG45XYAFRAPX0R2YFE UBHQ40HM26Z21RUT58CA5SY ELT1B5LGF6G6XWBF3EJ3JGV

🔥5🎉21

10 Jun 2024, 14:14 UTC≈5,240 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Android 14 kwgt @RajjAryaa Sunrise icons @OuniDesigns Unika Wallpapers @colorwallies @SetupSpam

👍103

25 May 2024, 04:24 UTC≈5,380 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#wallpaper #desktop @Lunita7976 made for Colorwallies ❤️ https://bio.link/colorwallies #amoled #simple #painting #design #gradient

4👍1😁1

20 Apr 2024, 17:32 UTC≈6,120 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁94🍌2🌚1

23 Feb 2024, 05:17 UTC≈7,640 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍102

23 Feb 2024, 05:16 UTC≈7,070 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#wallpaper @colorwallies https://bio.link/colorwallies #light #simple #painting #design #gradient

6👍3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @colorwallies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 307,367 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wallpapers by Colorwallies” (@colorwallies), 2,174 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/colorwallies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.