Channel
@collisium
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
203subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001319859517 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @collisium |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/collisium |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 09:21 | 203 | +2 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 201 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 200 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 201 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 203 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:39 | 203 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 15 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
32 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 40.6% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 21.9% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Binance назвал ИИ источником инфляции. Я не финансист, и не разбираюсь в экономике, но хочу поделиться наблюдениями об инфляции человеческого труда, которая, как мне кажется, вызывается использованием искусственного интеллекта. Ему не нужно столько же времени, сколько человеку, чтобы создать контент или генерацию изображение, и это заставляет мир становиться быстрее. Если раньше все думали, что, чтобы сделать дизай…
❤2👨💻1
Как вписать современную инфраструктуру в древний сложный рельеф? Архитектурный ансамбль верхней станции канатной дороги Котора - кейс, когда архитектура вписана в панораму. При этом здания служат не просто утилитарным хабом, а новой точкой притяжения. Отсюда трафик плавно расходится на прогулочные зоны парка Ловчен и хайкинг-маршруты. Но главные герои здесь — виды.
👍3
Черногорское Монако - прогулка по району Порто Монтенегро. Главный застройщик района ICD - компания из Дубая, а проектируют его мировые бюро, включая ReardonSmith Architects и WATG. Это эталонный кейс джентрификации и эталонного редивелопмента, а также хороший пример 15-минутного города. Приватные зоны резиденций с бассейнами на крышах четко отделены по вертикали от оживленного общественного променада. Полный приори…
👍3
На Пушкина-Макатаева забыли сделать остановку и проход к ней
👍3🥴2🤪1
Ой, нет, я передумала. Стройте, пожалуйста, монорельсу, но оставьте людям BRT на Тимирязева, там такое количество людей в автобусах проезжает, если ее убрать, все эти люди из автобусов на такси пересядут или на личный транспорт и тогда мы вообще полностью встанем. Вообще, делаются ли какие-либо просчеты перед тем, как такие предложения вносить, обоснования, обследования.
❤2
Чуть ниже посадили собсна самого Александра Сергеевича.
👍3💯2
На Пушкина появился кот учёный
🔥2👏1💯1
Иногда я думаю, что я все еще сплю, и мне снится странный сон про Skytrain/монорельс/лрт/whateverisnotonthegroundlevel в Алматы.
💯2
Пока сложилось впечатление, что в городе много интересных зон для прогулки, но они не до конца встроены в город, скорее как мини-островки, где можно погулять. Но погулять от одной зоны к другой через весь город пока сложно, и хотелось бы, чтобы привнесли именно это. Я понимаю, что климат жаркий, и, возможно не очень располагает к прогулкам, но зелень, навесы и тень от домов могут помочь с этим справиться. Сейчас ест…
❤3👍1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @collisium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алматинский Архитектор” (@collisium), 203 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/collisium.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.