Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

The Collective Mission

@collectivem

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,375subscribers

+152 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001172394368
TypeChannel
Username@collectivem
Created13 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/collectivem

Growth

1,2231,3751,2996 August 2026 — 1,223 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,223 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,231 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,375 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,200–1,398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:241,375+144
9 Aug 2026, 19:321,231+8
6 Aug 2026, 08:461,223no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:441,223first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 1,375 subscribers
Avg views / post
304
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.916%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held19 (25 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total4,858
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC≈163 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

This is some sick shit. And THEY'RE plnning for it to become "standard of care" in medicine. THEY already do this in other very nefarious ways. Clones are already here pretending to be human. Anything THEY openly release to the public, you can be sure THEY'VE been doing for decades already in private. “The Island” & “Never Let Me Go” are just two Disclosure films about this…

Signed Invinciblelight

2 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC≈293 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Imagine sitting down for dinner, taking a bite of a stir-fried mushroom, and suddenly watching dozens of tiny people, just two centimeters tall, marching across your tablecloth, scaling your glassware, and diving into your soup bowl. This isn't a fairy tale or a movie plot. It is a documented medical phenomenon caused by Lanmaoa asiatica, a wild bolete mushroom prized for its rich, savory flavor in the markets of Yu

Signed Invinciblelight

2 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC≈275 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Invinciblelight

1 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC≈284 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The longer you will research, the more you will understand how spiritual this realm is. The darkness vs light duality we're bathed in. Everywhere you turn: there it is. Benevolence vs malevolence. It's not a benign thing that's happening at an incredibly fast pace. Them selling us food that are infertile hybrids with no seeds. Food you can't eat and replant like all of time. Your "health" in the hands of white

Signed Invinciblelight

31 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTC≈349 viewsread 6 August 2026

Digital Twin = Digital voodoo https://youtu.be/fUUkLSc1liM

Signed Invinciblelight

30 Jul 2026, 00:37 UTC≈334 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

This problem...is far bigger then just Fauci. Professor Akyildiz says that every company that is shown in this screenshot is on board with the IoBNT system, and installing small scale nano machines into people. They are betting on it. He also said that he received a lot of funding from the National Science Foundation and the US Army to build this system since 2006. He has created research centers in America, Saudi

Signed Invinciblelight

20 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC≈381 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Remote, high precision surgical operations, implanted devices. By 2030 6G is expected to be fully rolled out. All things connected at all times. The internet of things. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6G-Internet-of-Things%3A-A-Comprehensive-Survey-Nguyen-Ding/9a828a0c71afe56610531a8036635d1b06c7b157

Signed Invinciblelight

18 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC≈323 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Load balancing is one of the most critical aspects that ppl should be aware of. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157821000094?

Signed Invinciblelight

18 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC≈304 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

I'm about to launch a private group dedicated to building a knowledge database and gaining a deeper understanding of Digital Convergence, IoT, IoB, IoE, the Biofield, Biophysics, Cov-WBAN, and exploring practical solutions related to these topics. Understanding Digital Convergence and the Biofield is becoming more important than ever. If you're genuinely interested in these topics and are willing to contribute to t

Signed Invinciblelight

18 Jul 2026, 03:33 UTC≈299 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

EVERY LAST DROP Tokenizing, Mapping, and Metering Water — From UN “Bankruptcy” Declaration to Total Control “For much of the world, ‘normal’ is gone,” according to Kaveh Madani, Director of the UN University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH). That “normal” historical baseline — water rights/shares, old allocation schemes, everything farmers and communities have relied upon for generations — is

Signed Invinciblelight

17 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC≈357 viewsread 6 August 2026

One of the best video for beginners to understand about Digital convergence, IOB and how your Biofield is being utilised for 6G+, Internet of everything (IOE). https://youtu.be/FZG0PwlRpEQ?si=i-pM-I_4nII_WX1M

Signed Invinciblelight

16 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC≈315 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Here is a very interesting timeline in history for Bayer. 1898: Bayer trademarks a new cough medicine for children. They call it Heroin. 1899: they also trademark aspirin. Enjoy that one. It is the last unambiguously good thing on this list. 1900: Heroin is Bayer's best-selling product, marketed to mothers as non-addictive. 1915: they supply the German army over 170 tons of chlorine gas for the trenches. 1925: B

Signed Invinciblelight

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @collectivem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 765,452 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Collective Mission” (@collectivem), 1,375 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/collectivem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.