Video, posted without a caption
👍1🔥1
Channel
@collectionsupdates
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003809271104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @collectionsupdates |
| Created | 7 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/collectionsupdates |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 05:59 | 46 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 47 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 49 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:59 | 47 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 46 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 46 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
58 reactions across 8 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 20.7% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 19.0% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 15.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 12.1% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 8.62% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 6.90% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
👍1🔥1
Which is feels better?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
🎨 Update Notes Random Painting Better chances to get new painting with high level Removed the visible top-card swap on the tutorial Discover step. Your painting now appears in the right spot from the very first frame. • Tuned the roulette strip: fewer redraws per second, cleaner motion during the slow scroll, and a more pronounced glow on the winning tile. • Fixed a tiny image flicker that sometimes happened the mom…
❤4👍2🔥2
Looking not that bad
👎7👍3👏2🤬2🤮2❤1❤🔥1🤩1
Hey everyone, As Private Art: Collections grows, there is need to make some changes to ensure the project can continue to scale and expand safely. One of those changes is moving away from using original paintings as in-game content. Even though I deliberately chose works that are in the public domain, modern platform policies and legal requirements often expect developers to have clear rights to all content used in t…
😢5👎4👍2🤬2❤1👏1😁1🆒1
New Update: Sell your TON paintings at auction! The auction now welcomes lots from players. You can list any TON painting you own and let other collectors bid ⭐️ on it! What you can sell Any TON painting of Rare quality or higher (Rare, Legendary, Masterpiece). How it works 1. Pick a painting → tap Sell 2. Set your starting price in ⭐ (minimum price is Painting Value) 3. Choose duration 4. Sign the TON transfer to…
🔥1
🛡 Anti-Cheat All game-state mutations are server-validated. Coin balance, XP, durability, quiz answers — the client never decides what it earns. Drip-credited income keeps the visible "live balance" in lock-step with the authoritative server number; players can spend exactly what they see. NFT mints are reconciled with on-chain ownership every cycle.
❤2👍1🔥1🦄1
🏆 Influence System Each painting accumulates influence XP from exhibitions. XP unlocks levels via a quadratic curve: xp_required_for_level(L) = sum of (2k + k²) for k = 1..L Higher level → higher rating → higher rarity tier → higher exhibit income → tighter loop.
❤2🔥1
Private Art: Collections — Game Mechanics A mobile-first Telegram Mini App where players curate a gallery of legendary paintings, build their reputation as a collector, and mint dynamic NFTs on the TON blockchain. Core Loop Buy → Exhibit → Earn → Upgrade → Repeat Buy paintings — pick a random artwork from the global catalog. Prices scale with your collection size. Exhibit them — display a painting in your gallery fo…
❤2🔥1
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @collectionsupdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which is feels better?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Collections updates” (@collectionsupdates), 46 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/collectionsupdates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.