Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @collectibles

Channel

@collectibles

@collectibles

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

239,489subscribers

-2,183 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002043309840
TypeChannel
Username@collectibles
DescriptionTelegram Native Tokenized IP. @crypto 🐐
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/collectibles

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

239,489241,672240,580.55 August 2026 — 241,672 subscribers6 August 2026 — 241,672 subscribers6 August 2026 — 241,643 subscribers7 August 2026 — 241,410 subscribers8 August 2026 — 241,202 subscribers8 August 2026 — 241,023 subscribers9 August 2026 — 240,803 subscribers10 August 2026 — 240,578 subscribers11 August 2026 — 240,328 subscribers12 August 2026 — 240,095 subscribers14 August 2026 — 239,886 subscribers15 August 2026 — 239,489 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 10 days, net -2,183. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 239,162–241,999 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:06239,489-397
14 Aug 2026, 03:56239,886-209
12 Aug 2026, 23:39240,095-233
11 Aug 2026, 20:17240,328-250
10 Aug 2026, 20:33240,578-225
9 Aug 2026, 20:52240,803-220
8 Aug 2026, 23:55241,023-179
8 Aug 2026, 02:57241,202-208
7 Aug 2026, 06:01241,410-233
6 Aug 2026, 05:25241,643-29
6 Aug 2026, 00:54241,672no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:01241,672first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
47
Videos
13
Links
55

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,352 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,28052.4%
🔥2,01646.3%
280.643%
👍280.643%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,352reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 11 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,063
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 20 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
501
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @collectibles. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 December 2025 to 11 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Feb 2026, 18:55 UTC≈39,600 views189 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026

FREEDOM! Khamzat Chimaev

118🔥71

4 Feb 2026, 16:35 UTC≈23,300 views173 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Burns (X) Thanks @telegram 🎁

🔥9479

2 Feb 2026, 20:09 UTC≈19,500 views143 reactions4 Starsread 16 August 2026

Khamzat (X) A billion people on @Telegram. A billion lives connected by @Durov. A billion people to share my Gifts.

77🔥66

1 Feb 2026, 16:17 UTC≈37,800 views157 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Khamzat (X): I fight everyone. You just tap a button. Buy my official Telegram gifts with @Telegram Stars.

🔥9265

31 Jan 2026, 15:02 UTC≈32,800 views237 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Big thanks to the whole team at @telegram X

126🔥111

26 Jan 2026, 19:18 UTC≈16,400 views254 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Merab (X & IG): Relentless pace. No slowing down. 🇬🇪 Not even for buying my official Telegram gifts. Safe and simple with @Telegram Stars.

🔥140114

19 Jan 2026, 20:34 UTC≈36,100 views242 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026

Charles O (X): Obrigado @durov por apoiar os lutadores e suas histórias. 🤝

🔥138104

19 Jan 2026, 16:59 UTC≈15,700 views340 reactions3 Starsread 16 August 2026

Jon Jones (X & IG): Thank you @Durov for building something independent.🤝

184🔥156

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @collectibles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 102,485 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@collectibles” (@collectibles), 239,489 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/collectibles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.