Радио КОЛЛАЖ pinned a photo

Channel
Радио КОЛЛАЖ
@collage_almond
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,039subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001689310492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @collage_almond |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/collage_almond |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 4,039 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 4,036 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 4,037 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 4,040 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 4,040 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.8%
- avg views ÷ 4,039 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 597
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 12.5%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,386 |
| Reactions total | 299 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 49s
- Average length
- 4m 49s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
299 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 126 | 42.1% | |
| 🔥 | 100 | 33.4% | |
| 🦄 | 33 | 11.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 7.02% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 3.01% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 2.34% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 0.669% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.334% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Мне никогда не приходило в голову сказать себе: «я поеду в Японию, чтобы встретиться с Миядзаки». Если бы я произнесла это вслух, взрослая часть меня, наверное, тут же сказала бы: «не смеши, — кто ты, а кто Миядзаки?» Поэтому мечта спряталась так глубоко, что я сама перестала её замечать. Мне просто хотелось в Японию. А сейчас, оглядываясь назад, я вдруг увидела, что вся дорога была соткана из маленьких чудес. Эта и…
🔥36❤🔥21❤9🦄5
Мне сегодня 40 🤍 Если честно, я хотела написать что-то длинное, подвести итоги, вот это вот всё… Но вместо этого покажу вам одну фотографию. В этом году со мной случилось кое-что настолько удивительное, что до сих пор не до конца верится. И если выбирать самый удивительный подарок — то это она: встреча с очень преочень важным для меня землянином (люблю не могу). Историю обязательно расскажу позже — она требует отд…
❤70🔥31🦄18🍓5🆒1
Всё в жизни когда-то бывает первый раз! Сегодня наша с Димой Чайкой @chimadaikachannel работа была выставлена на онлайн-аукционе канала Творческий Питер @calllush. Это особенное ощущение — видеть, как работа выходит из мастерской и начинает жить своей отдельной жизнью: в новом контексте, среди других авторов, в пространстве выбора и внимания. Работа ушла за 11 000 ₽ коллекционеру из Москвы. Пусть ей там будет уютно…
❤28🔥12😍7🦄5😇2
Иногда выставки случаются в неожиданных местах, потому что мир вдруг начинает подыгрывать твоей идее. Создавая серию «Халдейский ряд» мы с калининградским художником Димой Чайкой @chimadaikachannel задумали, что каждому богу с наших коллажей мы посвятим отдельное открытие. Первое состоялось в калининградском арт-пространстве «Сигнал». Затем была нелегальная арт-интервенция в филиал Третьяковской галереи. Но, пожалуй…
🔥21❤19🦄5🍓2😍2
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @collage_almond. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 144,713 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@meowafisha · 7,1322 postsТворческий Питер
@calllush · 3,6351 postChe_collage
@che_collage · 941 postChimadaika
@chimadaikachannel · 1571 postПРОДАШЬ КОЛЛАЖ?
@collage_sale · 2951 postФотография Екатерины Кастальской
@ekaterinakastalskayaart · 1051 postЮжная склейка
@yuzhnaya_skleyka · 3951 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Радио КОЛЛАЖ” (@collage_almond), 4,039 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/collage_almond.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.