Channel
@coinriseotc
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,255subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001775851277 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coinriseotc |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coinriseotc |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
4,070 average views per post against 1,255 subscribers — an engagement rate of 324.1%. Across the 2,252 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 5.33% and 37.0%, with a median of 16.0%.
| Window | 30 days (17 July 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 11 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 44,740 |
| Mature posts only | 324.1% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 1,255 measured 14 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:zho · 2,252 channels · p10 1.12% · p25 5.33% · p50 16.0% · p75 37.0% · p90 67.6% |
| Position in cohort | 99.778th percentile · 20.2× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.231% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:29 | 1,255 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 1,260 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 1,261 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 1,262 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 44,740 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
最近個市場真係精彩過坐過山車—— 朝早升到以為財務自由，食個午飯返嚟已經變成財務自閉；夜晚準備溝貨，點知佢又突然彈返上去，搞到全市場集體懷疑人生。😂 更離譜嘅係，平時用開嗰堆技術指標，今次全部好似約埋一齊請病假： 📉 RSI 話超賣，個市繼續跌； 📈 MACD 剛剛金叉，下一秒直接骨折； 📊 支持位變成穿透位，阻力位變成心理陰影； 🐋 鯨魚唔知去咗邊； 🐬 白海豚忙緊搶救； 🖥️ K線圖、新聞數據、情緒指標，全部進入「系統維修中」。 小編研究咗成晚，終於搵到真正原因—— 原來老闆一直爭咗一個最重要嘅指標：特朗普K線。 特朗普K線使用方法非常簡單： 佢一開口，市場即刻放大波幅； 佢一發文，K線自動轉方向； 佢講「好消息」，大家先準備避險； 佢話「問題不大」，交易所伺服器就要準備搶修。🤣 最神奇嘅地方係，呢個指標唔需要畫線、唔需要計公式，亦唔需要回測。 只需要開啟新聞通知，再配合一杯茶，同埋一顆足夠強大嘅心臟。 所以最…
👎1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔋 JYL｜滿電開工 昨日好好休息、重新充滿能量；今日全員狀態100%，正式投入工作！💪🏻 適當休息，唔係停低腳步，而係為下一段路準備更穩定、更充足嘅狀態。 新一日、新節奏，團隊已經準備就緒。精神返晒嚟，今日繼續為大家提供穩定、專業嘅服務！ JYL全員上線，準備開工！🚀
💆🏻 JYL 團建日｜一齊放鬆・一齊成長 平日大家一齊開工、一齊處理大小事務；今日就暫時放低工作，帶埋屋企人同小朋友，一齊按摩、食蛋糕、飲杯茶，享受難得嘅輕鬆時光。 公司團建唔單止係食飯同玩樂，更重要係讓團隊真正休息、增進默契，亦多謝每一位同事及家人一直以來喺背後嘅支持。 識得全力工作，亦要識得適時放鬆。充滿電之後，我哋再一齊努力、繼續向前！💪🏻✨
🇯🇵 日圓告捷，今日收穫滿滿！ 今日低位、高位部署順利，團隊決定提早收兵，一齊去慶祝今次戰績！🥂 JYL 今日將於 18:30 提早收工，服務時間敬請大家留意。如有需要，歡迎提前聯絡我哋安排。 多謝大家一直以來對 JYL 嘅支持與信任，聽日再繼續努力！💪🏻
Photo, posted without a caption
多謝大家一直以來對我哋公司嘅支持與信任，今日繼續收穫滿滿、滿載而歸！☕️💰📈
Photo, posted without a caption
JYL x Coinrise🌙公告欄 pinned a photo
JYL 七周年｜七年同行，步履不停 自 2019 年走到今天，JYL 正式踏入第七個年頭。 七年，並不只是一個值得紀念的數字，更是一段由實際經驗、客戶信任、團隊投入，以及一次又一次調整累積而成的歷程。 由最初專注於日常兌換、交收協調及客戶服務，到今天逐步建立更完整的營運流程、風險管理、技術支援及企業架構，JYL 一直沒有刻意追求表面的速度與聲量，而是選擇在每一個階段，先將應做的事情做好。 有些工作已經落地，有些項目正在推進，有些方向仍處於籌備、測試及整合階段。 我們未必經常對外提及，但一直沒有停下來。 從日常服務開始，逐步建立自身標準 JYL 的起點，來自一個很簡單的理念： 認真處理每一次服務，妥善完成每一項承諾。 過去七年，我們持續參與不同類型的兌換、交收、協調及商業服務，亦在實際營運過程中，逐步理解客戶、合作夥伴及市場真正重視的是甚麼。 除了效率與價格之外，安排是否清晰、資訊是否準確、責任是否明確，以及整…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
⚽ JYL 世界盃特別安排 世界盃終極一戰即將上演，為讓團隊可以適當休息，同時保持翌日最佳服務狀態， JYL 將為相關同事作出彈性安排。 因此，部分前線及交收服務或會稍有延遲， 敬請大家預留多少少時間。 請放心，線上客服將繼續在線， 查詢、報價、預約及基本協調服務維持正常。 JYL 一直重視效率，亦重視團隊狀態。 我哋相信，穩定嘅團隊，先可以帶來更安全、更準確、更長遠嘅服務。 睇波可以投入，工作依然專業。 感謝各位客戶理解與支持。 JYL 團隊 線上客服如常在線｜現場服務或稍有延遲
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coinriseotc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 625,981 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JYL x Coinrise🌙公告欄” (@coinriseotc), 1,255 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinriseotc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.