Channel
@coinnama
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,218subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001756895785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coinnama |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coinnama |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 1,218 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 1,224 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 1,233 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 1,236 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 1,240 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,637 |
| Reactions total | 68 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
68 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 41 | 60.3% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 30.9% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#تحلیل BTC/USDT بیتکوین با حجم بالا از مثلث نزولی خارج شده است که نشاندهنده تغییر روند به سمت صعودی است. قیمت اکنون در حال حرکت به سمت تست مجدد ابر ایچیموکو و خط روند شکسته شده است. حفظ موفقیتآمیز قیمت بالای این سطوح تأییدکننده ادامه روند صعودی خواهد بود، بنابراین حرکات قیمت را به دقت زیر نظر داشته باشید. تحلیلگر: اکسپرس
❤1
دو ماه آخر بازار خرسی بیتکوین معمولاً بسیار نزولی است 🩸 اکثر مردم اکنون به سمت صعودی گرایش پیدا کردهاند و میگویند که کف قیمت قبلاً شکل گرفته است. بسیاری از افراد به چرخه چهار ساله مخالف هستند و همیشه در نهایت متضرر میشوند 🤷♂️ سرانجام تسلیم شدن اجتنابناپذیر است 📉 تحلیلگر: بولت
❤4😢1
🚨یک میلیارد دلار پوزیشن شورت #بیتکوین در معرض لیکویید شدن است! ⚡️سطح لیکوییدیشن روی 65,600 قرار دارد؛ تنها 2% با قیمت فعلی فاصله دارد.
❤3👍2
بهروزرسانی ساختار بازار خرسی بیتکوین 2026 تا الان خوب بوده 👌😎 با این حال، بیتکوین کمی بهتر از حد انتظار عمل کرده است. به هر حال، آخرین مرحله نزولی این بازار خرسی در راه است 📉🩸 تحلیلگر: بولت
❤3👌1
🐋 نهنگها دوباره مشغول خرید بیتکوین شدن اما آیا این یعنی بازار صعودیه؟ دادههای آنچین نشون میده نهنگها دوباره دست به کار شدن و بالای 2.4 میلیارد دلار خرید کردن اگه بعدش تقاضای اسپات رشد خوبی بکنه میتونیم انتظار یه چرخش کوتاه مدت و رشد داشته باشیم 👈بعدش مقاومتهای ۶۷ و ۷۰ هزار دلار مهمن که میانگین خرید هولدرهای کوتاه مدتن
❤1
🟢 برای سومین روز متوالی ورود سرمایه به ETFهای بیتکوین و اتریوم ادامه داره دیروز ای تی افهای اسپات بیتکوین ۲۴۴ میلیون دلار جریان ورودی سرمایه داشتن ایتیافهای اسپات اتریوم هم ۶۰.۸۶ میلیون دلار ورود سرمایه داشتن 👈این نشون میده تقاضای نهادی یه کم بهتر شده و سرمایهگذارهت تا حدی به اوضاع خوشبین شدن
❤1👍1
#تحلیل BTC/USDT بیتکوین از خط روند مقاومت مثلث نزولی عبور کرده است که نشاندهنده یک تغییر احتمالی در حرکت بازار است. میانگین متحرک 50 روزه (50MA) در حال حاضر به عنوان یک مانع مقاومت عمل میکند و از رشد بیشتر جلوگیری میکند. یک شکست موفقیتآمیز بالای 50MA میتواند قدرت این حرکت را تأیید کند و ممکن است باعث ادامه روند صعودی شود. تحلیلگر: اکسپرس
❤4👍1
🔺 تولید آمریکا قویتر از انتظار بازار شاخص ISM Manufacturing آمریکا به 55.6 رسید در حالی که بازار انتظار 54 را داشت این یعنی بخش تولید آمریکا همچنان در حال رشده و اقتصاد هنوز نشونههای قابلتوجهی از قدرت داره 📌 برای بازار کریپتو این داده میتونه دو لبه باشه: 👈از یک طرف، اقتصاد قوی یعنی احتمال رکود کمتر؛ 👈از طرف دیگه، اگر اقتصاد بیش از حد داغ بمونه، فشار روی فدرال رزرو برای کاهش نرخ بهره کمتر میشه
❤6
نمودار هفتگی بیتکوین ($BTC) به نظر میرسد که این هفته ما 200 میانگین متحرک هفتگی را از دست خواهیم داد 👀 دقیقاً مانند تابستان 2022، ما در ژوئن 200MA را از دست دادیم و سپس در ژوئیه سعی کردیم آن را دوباره به دست آوریم، اما موفق نشدیم. من هنوز هم منتظر پایینترین سطوح جدید هستم 📉 🤷♂️ تحلیلگر: بولت
❤3
🔻 سکوت سنگین در بازار بیتکوین و اتریوم! حجم صحبت و توییت درباره بیتکوین و اتریوم به پایینترین سطوح بازار نزولی رسیده مشابه چیزی که آخرین بار در سال ۲۰۲۲ دیدیم 📌 این یعنی چی؟ فعلا هیجان و توجه عمومی به بازار خیلی کم شده و احساسات معاملهگران بهشدت سرد شده 👈یکی از دلایلی که نشون میده توی فاز انباشت هستیم ، معمولا پول هوشمند سر حوصله و تو سکوت کار خودشو میکنه
❤4👍1
🔴فشار خروج سرمایه از استیبلکوینها ادامه دارد جولای سومین ماه متوالی بود که خروج خالص سرمایه از استیبلکوینها ثبت شد 📌این اتفاق مهمه چون معمولاً وقتی سرمایه از استیبلکوینها خارج میشه، یعنی بخشی از نقدینگی بازار کریپتو در حال کاهش پیدا کردنه و پول کمتری آماده ورود به بیتکوین و آلتکوینهاست
👍3
🔴 فشار فروش بیتکوین هنوز به مرحله کاپیتولاسیون نرسیده طبق دادههای آنچین Glassnode، درصد عرضه بیتکوین در ضرر دوباره به زیر محدوده ۴۰٪ رسیده 👈مقدار قابلتوجهی از بیتکوین در ضرره، اما هنوز فشار روانی بازار به اندازهای نیست که معمولا در کفهای سنگین بازار دیده میشه 🔸به زبان ساده فعلا نشونهای از تسلیم کامل فروشندهها دیده نمیشه
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coinnama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,376,052 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تحلیل کریپتو (کوین نما)” (@coinnama), 1,218 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinnama.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.