Follow x account fast: https://x.com/MutantOwls Big project
🔥39❤32👍30🎉26😁25

Channel
@coinmemme
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
200subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003625868509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coinmemme |
| Description | Official X account: https://x.com/Coinmemes 64k x followers |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 16 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coinmemme |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 200 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:59 | 200 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
6,731 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 891 | 13.2% | |
| 🎉 | 890 | 13.2% | |
| 👏 | 879 | 13.1% | |
| 🤩 | 875 | 13.0% | |
| 🥰 | 864 | 12.8% | |
| ❤ | 854 | 12.7% | |
| 🔥 | 848 | 12.6% | |
| 😁 | 88 | 1.31% | |
| 👎 | 79 | 1.17% | |
| 💩 | 76 | 1.13% | |
| 🤬 | 74 | 1.10% | |
| 🤯 | 69 | 1.03% | |
| 🤮 | 66 | 0.981% | |
| 😱 | 63 | 0.936% | |
| 🤔 | 60 | 0.891% | |
| 😢 | 55 | 0.817% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,731reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Follow x account fast: https://x.com/MutantOwls Big project
🔥39❤32👍30🎉26😁25
I spent some time exploring the demo platform that @intodotspace has been working on, and it already shows a pretty clear direction for where things are going. The whole flow is in place. Markets, trading views, portfolios, and user profiles all connect in a way that feels natural. Nothing feels forced or patched together. You can move through the product and immediately understand how it is meant to work. One more…
👎79💩76🤬74🤯69🤮66😁63😱63🤔60
I just love to get this kind of support from @solsticefi. Been creating about Solstice since the start of October, and I get the replies from solstice almost everyday, with occasional reposts. I'm glad to be a part of solstice as a creator and a user, soon as an $SLX holder.
👏193🤩186🎉177🥰171👍164🔥164❤151
my daily routine with @solsticefi 👀 > wake up > check $USX tvl > check my total flares > make new solstice contents > check my xeet rank > engage with my solstice frens > sleep > repeat this is how i'm fully locked in, if you're still fading, you might get cooked soon.
👍96👏94🔥87❤86🎉83🥰81🤩79
CoinMemes announcement pinned a photo
Year 2024, users was earned good rewards from @MaviaGame Airdrop @NexiraDAEP is a gaming focused project built by @MaviaGame ✨ Reward Pool: 50M RUBY and Convertibe to $NEXI at TGE ✨ Referral cap - only 5 invites (fair distribution) ✅ https://www.nexira.ai/airdrops?refid=5yyY1z3K • Create an Account via Google • Connect your Social Accounts • Do Complete the Social Tasks • Daily Check-in • Invite 5 friends to earn…
👍87🤩86🎉84❤78🥰74👏62🔥62
What caught my eye about @solsticefi is how they handle transparency without asking for trust. Most protocols ask you to trust dashboards. Solstice does the opposite. USX solvency can be independently verified through cryptographic proofs, not statements. What makes this different: • data pulled from primary onchain and offchain sources • proofs fail if anything is altered • reserves, supply, and collateral ratios…
👍95🥰93🎉92👏92🤩83❤80🔥71
I had seen @useTria mentioned before, but I didn't really care. That was a mistake, I admit. So what impressed me now? For example, how it deals with failures. If something breaks, Tria knows where it broke. As a user, you don't sit around wondering what happened. I think this is very important for developers. I have to admit, yes, it feels a bit like a crypto neobank, but you still hold your own funds. Spend, trad…
👏106🥰99🤩91🔥86🎉79👍74❤70
wait, @solsticefi's fee in the last 30 days is around 360k and cumulative fees are at 1.32m? a "boring" protocol earning that much while a bunch of “hundreds of millions raised” projects are still busy selling vibes kinda love how boring it is. just letting stables do their job and quietly earn
🤩97👍90🔥86🎉85❤84🥰81👏77
1st 👇 Not shocking to see @intodotspace pulling serious demand. Over $10M committed and already 4× oversubscribed says enough. The setup is clean: a strong narrative, fair entry pricing, and 100% of the allocation unlocked at TGE. No slow drip, no guesswork. If you haven’t looked yet, Into Space is a leveraged prediction market on Solana — higher conviction, higher risk, higher upside. Simple mechanics, sharp expo…
🥰106👏99🎉98🤩97🔥88❤85👍81
Solstice is making $362K monthly revenue daily ~$15K Even wen TVL hasn’t spiked much @solsticefi TVL is sitting at $303M lots of updates coming this month, TVL will probably move up soon & we might hit the next milestone at $375M So, 8.5% $SLX allocation for Flares holders & people are still waiting for the “perfect time” to deploy their stables I’ve been collecting Flares consistent recently crossed 75M, curren…
❤94🥰85👍83🎉80🔥72👏71🤩66
Apparently you can change your ref link on Solstice Already saw during the last weeks this doubt about @solsticefi and I just changed the referral I was using and apparently it is possible to do it And I can confirm it's not retroactive but it starts to accrue once you change it only, so the past Flares stay with the past referral Also I use this opportunity to also share how much I got through referrals since als…
❤82👍77🤩74🎉72👏69🔥69🥰62
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @coinmemme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@coinmemme named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CoinMemes announcement” (@coinmemme), 200 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinmemme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.