5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,183–2,186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 20:12
2,183
-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:40
2,184
-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:51
2,186
+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:05
2,185
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:10
2,185
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.9%
avg views ÷ 2,183 subscribers
Avg views / post
719
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.974%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held
20 (22 December 2025 – 17 July 2026)
Views total
719
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
356 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
168
47.2%
❤
136
38.2%
😁
43
12.1%
👎
8
2.25%
💩
1
0.281%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 356reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coinicap. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 December 2025 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🗞 از ابتدای 2018 تا 2025 حدود 2.2 میلیارد دلار تتر-USDT روی هردو شبکه اتریوم و ترون مسدود شده بود که این رقم در طول 20 ماه گذشته و شروع موج گسترده مسدود سازی والتهای مرتبط با ایران به مجموع 5 میلیارد دلار رسیده است. بیشینه این مسدود سازی، والتهای مرتبط با ایران میباشد.
🔹 بخش بزرگتر و نامشخص این مسدود سازیها پشت صرافیهای خارجی اتفاق افتاده است که شامل همه رمزارزها میباشد و آمار مشخصی از حجم آن در دسترس نیست اما…
💸 بنیاد تتر امروز و در دومین موج بزرگ 🔥 نابودسازی 🔥 30 روزه گذشته؛ بیش از 25 میلیون دلار تتر مرتبط با والت های ایرانی را برای همیشه سوزاند و از چرخه خارج کرد. در موج قبلی نیز 20 میلیون دلار نابود شده بود.
🔴 این والتها با دو فرد ایرانی به نامهای علیرضا درخشان و آرش استکی که سال گذشته در لیست تحریمهای خزانهداری آمریکا قرار گرفتند بودند، تراکنش مالی داشته اند.
🟡 این موج امروز مسدود سازی و سوزاندن تتر همچنان ادام…
دوستان با هویت ایرانی که در صرافی CoinEx حساب کاربری دارید، تا ۳ ماه(۲۵ سپتامبر) وقت دارید داراییتون رو از کوینکس برداشت بزنید.
اجازه هیچگونه تراکنش ورودی و تریدی نخواهید داشت.
با اجازه از ادمین
هر آدرسی در شبکههایی مثل بیتکوین و اتریوم و سولانا و ... میتونه فلگ بشه.
اما فریز دو دسته هست:
یکی فریز آنچین (on chain) هست که رمزارزهایی مثل تتر و usdc و داراییهای RWA (مثل سهامهای تسلا و اپل و انویدیا و نفت و نقره و کلاً داراییهای شرکتهای backed و ondo) چنانچه آدرسِ مربوط بهشون فلگ شده باشه، حتی داخلِ خودِ کیفِ پولی مثل لجر هم میتونن فریز و مسدود بشن. (اما BTC و ETH و SOL و ... اگر داخل شبکه…
وزارت خزانهداری آمریکا چهار صرافی ایرانی را در فهرست تحریمهای خود قرار داد.
نوبیتکس (Nobitex)
والکس (Wallex)
بیتپین (Bitpin)
رمزینکس (Ramzinex)
پیش از برداشت تتر یا سایر داراییها، آدرس کیف پول مقصد را در لیستهای تحریمی و بلاکشده بررسی کنید.
🔹 از نگهداری مبالغ بالا در صرافیها خودداری کنید.
🔹 برای نگهداری بلندمدت داراییها از کیف پول سختافزاری مانند Trezor یا Dorj استفاده کنید.
🔹 عبارت بازیابی (Seed Phrase…
در روزهایی که هیچچیز قابل پیشبینی نیست، نگهداری امن از دارایی دیجیتال فقط یک انتخاب نیست؛ یک احتیاط هوشمندانه است.
وقتی خانه، وسایل، گوشی یا لپتاپ ممکن است در آتش، آب، ضربه یا حوادث غیرمنتظره از بین بروند، تنها چیزی که میتواند دسترسی شما به کیف پول دیجیتالتان را حفظ کند، عبارات بازیابی شماست.
رمزنگاره ساخته شده تا Seed Phrase شما روی کاغذ، در دفترچه یا داخل موبایل جا نماند؛ بلکه روی فولاد ضدزنگ حک شود و در برا…
🔺از شاهراه سرعت تا جیرهبندی ارتباط؛ شبکه ملی چگونه اینترنت ملی شد
🔹شبکه ملی اطلاعات در دورهای تقریبا ۲۰ ساله، از پروژهای که با وعده افزایش سرعت، کاهش هزینه و توسعه اقتصاد دیجیتال معرفی میشد، به تدریج به ابزاری برای تابآوری در بحرانها، کنترل دسترسی و مدیریت ارتباطات در شرایط امنیتی تبدیل شده است. بررسی روند اظهارات مسئولان و تصمیمات سیاستی نشان میدهد این پروژه از یک زیرساخت فنی به یکی از مهمترین میدانهای منا…
صرافی تاپ ۱۰ ایرانی والکس ناشیانه برای توکن بی نام و نشان ایکس-امپایر با نماد X که تمام رد فلگ های کلاهبرداری بودن رو داشت کمپین تبلیغاتی رفت.
🚩 توکنی که سعی داشت با سوء استفاده از شخصیت هایی مانند ایلان ماسک و شبکه اجتماعی X خود را به مخاطب "شناخته شده و مقبول" معرفی کند و در این راه موفق هم شد.
🦠با ترویج و معرفی این توکن در ایران، به یکباره به شکل ویروسی در تمام صرافیهای ایرانی لیست شد و رقابت سنگینی برای تبلیغا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coinicap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 298,390 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coinicap” (@coinicap), 2,183 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinicap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.