Channel
@coinanalizegitimgrup
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
26,079subscribers
-3,791 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002426983808 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coinanalizegitimgrup |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 54 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coinanalizegitimgrup |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:16 | 26,079 | -55 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:49 | 26,134 | -35 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:42 | 26,169 | -92 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 26,261 | -97 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 26,358 | -84 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 26,442 | -87 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 26,529 | -80 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 26,609 | -57 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 26,666 | -95 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 26,761 | +755 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 26,006 | +5,142 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:25 | 20,864 | -81 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 20,945 | -141 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 21,086 | -142 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 21,228 | -117 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:28 | 21,345 | -19 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 21,364 | +17 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 21,347 | -12 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 21,359 | +19 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 21,340 | first reading |
537 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 147 of 233 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 537 (5 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 182,098 |
| Reactions total | 3,941 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 18:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,634 reactions across 227 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,634 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 238 of the 537 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,634 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 537 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coinanalizegitimgrup. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 537 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
İyi akşamlar dostlar, VOLT 0.8218$ ’a gelmiş fiyatı.. %792 yükseliş var. Satalım bunu seri bi şekilde 8X yapmış coin… 1 saat önce 0.12$ dan aldık şuan 0.82$ daha fazla anlatmaya gerek yok fena bir kâr aldık çok şükür🙏 🙏 Elimdeki tüm VOLT’ları satıyorum herkes satsın herkese bereketli olsun 🙏 Bu seviyeden bu coine girmeyin arkadaşlar, satış yaptık.
Abi aldığım anda %14 artıya geçti ben şok
Adamsın kral abim adam sen sat diyene kadar devam 👍👍👍👍
Hocam iyi yükseliyor he şaka maka bi 20x gelirse şaşırmam
Abi bu önerdiğin VOLT coini aldım şimdi 3000 dolarlık aldım şuan bakiyem 3750 olmuş Allah’ına kurban senin
Usta bu coin de hedef nedir ben yeni alım yaptım da nereye kadar bekleyeceğiz
Hocam çok teşekkürler az yükselmesine rağmen şu anda güzel kârdayım nereye kadar gider sence dünkü gibi 100x üstü olur mu
Dostlar VOLT coin, şu an radarımda olan en güçlü altcoinlerden biri. Mevcut fiyat seviyelerinin kısa vadeli yatırımcılar için dikkat çekici bir fırsat sunduğunu düşünüyorum. Kendi analizime göre ciddi bir yükseliş potansiyeline sahip ve bu nedenle portföyümde yer veriyorum.1-2 güne 50x yapabilir.Özellikle önceki fırsatları kaçıranların mutlaka değerlendirmesi gereken bir fırsat. Sabitlenen mesajda nasıl alınacağına …
0xe2Da411713a625AA332d6dE2b49670FB5bE9E048
🪙Binance borsasından nasıl $VOLT alınır? Videoda nasıl alacağınız ile alakalı tüm detayları anlatılıyor. Takıldığınız yer olursa veya soru sormak isterseniz @cryptodayiiletisim hesabıma mesaj atabilirsiniz ✍️ 🪙 $VOLT Contrat Adress (dokun kopyala) 👇 0xe2Da411713a625AA332d6dE2b49670FB5bE9E048
🪙 Volt Finance $VOLT Kripto dünyasında finansı daha hızlı, erişilebilir ve şeffaf hale getirmek için yola çıkıyoruz. $VOLT, kullanıcıları ve dijital varlıkları tek bir güçlü ekosistemde buluşturarak yeni nesil finans deneyimini hedefliyor. 🌐 🪙 $VOLT Contrat Adress (dokun kopyala) 👇 0xe2Da411713a625AA332d6dE2b49670FB5bE9E048 Basit, güçlü ve geleceğe odaklı bir finans ekosistemi. 🚀 Volt Finance — Finance, Powered …
🚨 Son 30 dakika dostlar , bir sonraki mesaj coin adı ve kontrat adresi olacak.
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 537 posts we hold for @coinanalizegitimgrup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @coinanalizegitimgrup as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Dayı ️ | Bitcoin Kripto Analiz & Sinyaller” (@coinanalizegitimgrup), 26,079 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinanalizegitimgrup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.