Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝒆𝒏𝒊𝒈𝒎𝒂

@cohlefa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,327subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001787958437
TypeChannel
Username@cohlefa
Created2 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cohlefa

Growth

1,3191,3271,3237 August 2026 — 1,319 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,319 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,327 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,318–1,328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:241,327+8
7 Aug 2026, 22:311,319no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:051,319first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.2%
avg views ÷ 1,327 subscribers
Avg views / post
427
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (14 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,691
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC74 viewsread 7 August 2026

اگه بخوام یک نقطه ی عطف رو بگم احتمالا همین باشه . از اینجا به بعد، نوع کارام از بازنمایی به فضاسازی تغییر کرد( حالا چه در بعضی کارها موفق بوده باشم و چه نه. ) چیزی که دنبالش هستم روایت مستقیم نیست و بیشتر ساختن فضا با نور و رنگ های محدوده . تا قبل از این، بیشتر با ضربه‌قلم‌های حجمی کار می‌کردم اما از این به بعد به اصطلاح آبرنگی‌تر شدند. احساس می‌کنم این شیوه بیشتر به فضایی که می‌خوام بسازم کمک می‌کنه🤔

Signed FM

7 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC53 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⊹این پیام رو فوروارد کنید توی چنلتون. بعد هم نقاشی‌ای که فکر می‌کنید نقطه‌ی عطف مسیر هنری‌تون بوده رو بفرستید؛ اثری که بعد از خلقش احساس کردید نگاهتون یا جزئیات کارهاتون نسبت به قبل تغییر کرده و مسیر جدیدی برای ادامه دادن پیدا کردید. من هم اینجا قرارشون می‌دم تا با هم شاهدشون باشیم.

Signed FM

25 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC383 viewsread 7 August 2026

هیچ استادی به اندازه‌ی استاد ابرنگمون (مهدی فرهادیان) نتونسته بود منو به یک تکنیک یا متریالی علاقه‌مند کنه

Signed FM

19 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC476 viewsread 7 August 2026

ما نه با افراد می‌جنگیم نه با سیاستی خاص، بلکه با طبقه‌ای که این سیاست و این افراد را به وجود می‌آورد می‌جنگیم. " دست های آلوده از سارتر"

Signed FM

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cohlefa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒆𝒏𝒊𝒈𝒎𝒂” (@cohlefa), 1,327 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cohlefa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.