Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CoffeeWithBTC | Кофе с Биткоином

@coffeewithbtc

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28,161subscribers

-219 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002158724185
TypeChannel
Usernames@coffeewithbtc @thetonmind
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/coffeewithbtc

Growth

28,16128,38028,270.56 August 2026 — 28,380 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,380 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,380 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,372 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,356 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,350 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,339 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,339 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,258 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,225 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,207 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,198 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,191 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,180 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,177 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,164 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,161 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 7 days, net -219. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,128–28,413 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:1828,161-3
12 Aug 2026, 21:2828,164-13
12 Aug 2026, 06:5728,177-3
11 Aug 2026, 18:1328,180-11
11 Aug 2026, 04:2228,191-7
10 Aug 2026, 16:3328,198-9
10 Aug 2026, 04:5128,207-18
9 Aug 2026, 16:0428,225-33
9 Aug 2026, 05:0228,258-81
8 Aug 2026, 12:4528,339no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:5328,339-11
7 Aug 2026, 11:1528,350-6
7 Aug 2026, 02:5828,356-16
6 Aug 2026, 12:1028,372-8
6 Aug 2026, 02:0128,380no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3028,380no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:1128,380first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.34%
avg views ÷ 28,161 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,790
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.868%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held20 (25 May 202615 July 2026)
Views total3,570
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

248 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8835.5%
🔥8433.9%
👍7630.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
45
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 20 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coffeewithbtc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 May 2026 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,920 views21 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

🫶 Моё длиииииииинное интервью участников и спикеров самой тёплой крипто-конференции Крипто Юг 2026 В этом видео собраны самые яркие моменты форума Crypto Юг 2026: десятки интервью с участниками, спикерами, представителями криптокомпаний, майнингового бизнеса, бирж и Web3-проектов. Почему участники приезжают на Crypto Юг каждый год? Что ценнее — доклады или нетворкинг? Как развивается криптоиндустрия в России и поче

👍115🔥5

15 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,650 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💙 Увидимся на 17-м Blockchain Life 2026 в Дубае! 1-2 декабря в Дубае состоится Blockchain Life 2026 – одно из самых масштабных мировых событий по Web3, майнингу, криптовалютам и AI. 15000+ участников из 130+ стран, 200+ спикеров, AI Future – новое направление об AI технологиях будущего, глобальный нетворкинг и финал Формулы 1 🏎 Почему нужно лететь на Blockchain Life? ▪️Участников ждет целая неделя нетворкинга с кл

6👍2🔥2

1 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC≈3,370 views15 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026

❗️💵💵 Проект Open Standard и их новый СТЕЙБЛКОИН Open USD (OUSD) стали главной темой в криптоиндустрии Open Standard — это независимая компания-консорциум, управляемая советом директоров, в который входят представители её компаний-партнеров. По своей структуре она напоминает традиционные платежные сети вроде Visa или Mastercard, а не классического крипто-эмитента. ▪️Кто стоит во главе: Генеральным директором (CEO) п

6🔥6👍3

28 Jun 2026, 19:35 UTC≈1,930 views9 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @walletcommunitycis

💎 Bending Spoons на Nasdaq: Разбираем pre-IPO в Wallet Как раз перед листингом 30 июня пока в Wallet собирают заявки под IPO — токенизированные акции европейского ИТ-холдинга Bending Spoons (тикер: BSP), в сети появился разбор их официальной регистрационной формы F-1 (аналог S-1 для иностранных эмитентов), который сделал Daniel McCarthy (Associate Professor of Marketing at the Robert H. Smith School of Business, Uni

6👍2🔥1

22 Jun 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,860 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @walletcommunitycis

💎 Wallet Weekly Digest 15 — 22 June 2026 Таймкоды: 💵1:51 что по BTC 💵5:25 что по ЕТН 💎8:51 что по GRAM 🎁11:49 что по NFT и Tg Gifts ✈️13:46 новостей по Telegram нет 🙏14:21 что по Wallet in Telegram ✏️ Полностью выпуск можно посмотреть тут Всегда ваше и всегда на связи: @walletcommunitycis 💎

🔥53👍1

19 Jun 2026, 14:27 UTC≈2,140 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @walletcommunitycis

💵 Разбор приложения "Дневник Трейдера" Прекрасный и удобный помощник для фиксации истории развития ваших скилов в торговле. Ждём интеграции с Wallet! Разбираем функционал и полезности Дневника с его создателем — Gleb Cryptox ✏️ выпуск можно посмотреть тут Скачать приложение "Дневник Трейдера" 🍎 скачать на iPhone 📱 скачать на Android Всегда ваше и всегда на связи: @walletcommunitycis 💎

10👍4🔥3

18 Jun 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,870 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💵 Как-будто лучший трейдерский эфир, который я проводил Один из самых подробных разборов и индикаторов, TradingView и входов в сделки с Gleb Cryptox Таймкоды: 2:50 интро Глеба 9:00 профессии, которые опошлили 12:00 почему нравится трейдинг 13:20 Трейдинг Вью, что это 16:00 что такое индикаторы 17:40 Sunday Open 20:00 индикатор это ЧТО? 23:49 проблема юзабилити (включили 10 индюков) 26:20 пример юзабилити на своём и

5👍1🔥1

17 Jun 2026, 11:54 UTC≈2,450 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💎 Большой ребрендинг TON ❤️ в GRAM 💎: что происходит прямо сейчас? Технический срез по рынку на 17 июня 2026 года после исторического переименования. 💱Спотовый баланс ✔️Пропорция: 1 TON автоматически превращается в 1 GRAM. ✔️Что делать? Ничего. Никаких «мостов», «обменов» или клеймов. Если вам предлагают куда-то перевести монеты для обмена — это скам. ⌛Биржи: Bitget и CoinEx уже обновили тикеры. На OKX балансы пере

7👍3🔥2

15 Jun 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,670 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @walletcommunitycisPhoto

💎 СВЕРШИЛОСЬ! TON ➡️ GRAM ✔️ Всегда ваше и всегда на связи: @walletcommunitycis 💎

👍73🔥1

15 Jun 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,630 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptowallet_news_enPhoto

💎 Your Toncoin is now Gram The TON network token is being renamed to Gram, following a community vote to approve the renaming. 💎 Why Gram? Gram is the original name — the network's founders called the native token Gram. It was later changed to Toncoin, but Gram remained in the network's codebase throughout. As part of Make TON Great Again, the name is now returning. The blockchain itself, The Open Network, is not c

👍62🔥1

12 Jun 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,720 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @walletcommunitycis

🚀 IPO SpaceX (токенизированные акции) ✔️ 🚫 1. Binance: Кампания ПОЛНОСТЬЮ ОТМЕНЕНА Binance официально объявила, что кампания SPCXx IPO в Binance Web3 Wallet полностью остановлена из-за форс-мажорных обстоятельств (поставщик xStocks не смог предоставить акции) 🚫 2. Bitget: Продукт распродан, но это НЕ акции xStocksНа Bitget ситуация принципиально иная, так как они не запускали общую с другими биржами подписку на SPCX

🔥7👍63

9 Jun 2026, 07:39 UTC≈1,660 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @walletcommunitycisPhoto

💎 Wallet Live уже в этот четверг! 🔜 11 июня в 20:00 (МСК, GTM+3) 📍 ставь напоминание, чтобы не пропустить: https://t.me/walletcommunitycis?livestream ▪️Gleb Cryptox — Скальп трейдер, программист: создал приложение «Дневник трейдера», пишет авторские индикаторы для TRADINGVIEW Разберём индикаторы на TradingView, посмотрим Дневник Трейдера, послушаем о входах в сделку в Скальп ТРейдинге. Глеб — невероятно интересны

🔥82👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coffeewithbtc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 297,923 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CoffeeWithBTC | Кофе с Биткоином” (@coffeewithbtc), 28,161 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coffeewithbtc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.