Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for code zigu

Channel

code zigu

@codezigu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

222subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004339223233
TypeChannel
Username@codezigu
Descriptionпервый канал по будущим звездочкам коджигу <3 @codezigucoop & @codeziguanonbot
First recorded9 November 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/codezigu

Growth

2229 Nov 2026, 02:47 — 222 subscribers9 Nov 2026, 03:22 — 222 subscribers9 Nov 2026, 02:479 Nov 2026, 03:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 03:22222no change
9 Nov 2026, 02:47222first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 2 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.3%
avg views ÷ 222 subscribers
Avg views / post
107
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held15 (2 November 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total1,610
Reactions total234
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 03:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
224
Videos
89
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 25s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6929.5%
❤‍🔥3715.8%
💘3715.8%
👀2711.5%
💋2510.7%
🍓2410.3%
👻156.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 November 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 18:03 UTC50 viewsread 9 November 2026
Video

find someone who can give you everything & follow these channels 🤩 girls : aespa : winter 🪷 karina 🪷 giselle 🪷 ningning 🪷 winter ©️ illit : wonhee 🤩 meovv : anna 🤩 ella 🌟 ive : wonyoung 🌟 babymonster : ruka 🌟 pharita 🌟 asa 🌟 rami 🌟 ahyeon 🌟 rora 🌟 chiquita 🌟 blackpink : jennie ©️ rosé ©️ lisa ©️ kq new girl group 🪷 hearts2hearts : jiwoo ©️ stella & ian 🌟 code zigu 🪷 tuide 🐆 itzy 🐆 doOt project 🐆 solo : soojin 🐆 je…

7 Nov 2026, 14:55 UTC96 views14 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

ZZZ WITH BE BOYS 🥰

❤‍🔥5❤4💋2🍓1👀1💘1

7 Nov 2026, 14:53 UTC92 views15 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

🤩 тиктоки

❤6❤‍🔥3💘3💋2👀1

7 Nov 2026, 14:49 UTC87 views15 reactionsread 9 November 2026

🔗 code zigu — ‘zzz’ dance practice moving ver.

🍓5❤‍🔥3💋3❤2👀1💘1

6 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC112 views16 reactionsread 9 November 2026

🔗 code zigu — «zzz» show champion 1104

💘6❤3❤‍🔥3👻3💋1

4 Nov 2026, 13:57 UTC124 views14 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

11/04 ✶ tiktok upd — zzz челлендж, по одному: даын ➡️ малия ➡️ ерин ➡️ анджелина

❤7💘3❤‍🔥2👻2

4 Nov 2026, 11:43 UTC119 views17 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

⬜️ NEON BY DAEUN & MYA

💋7❤4🍓3👀2👻1

4 Nov 2026, 10:37 UTC118 views33 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

у девочек почти 18k фалловеров в тиктоке 😊

❤17❤‍🔥6💋6👀2👻1💘1

3 Nov 2026, 06:37 UTC155 views29 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📷 @.showkpop_live twitter upd

🍓13❤7💘5❤‍🔥3👻1

2 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC171 views23 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

зумеры вышли в тикток

👀11❤4❤‍🔥4🍓1👻1💋1💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @codezigu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“code zigu” (@codezigu), 222 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codezigu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.