Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кодовое слово⚡️APPFYL.COM

@codewords

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,185subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001792731144
TypeChannel
Username@codewords
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/codewords

Growth

1,1821,1851,183.57 August 2026 — 1,182 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,182 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,185 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,182–1,185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:561,185+3
7 Aug 2026, 07:461,182no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:361,182first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 5 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

421 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7718.3%
🔥7618.1%
6315.0%
👏5513.1%
🤯5513.1%
😁5312.6%
👎429.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 421reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2025 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jun 2026, 09:31 UTC123 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Создал скилл для Codex, с которым делать скриншоты для App Store получается великолепно. Теперь активно его юзаем на своих приложениях.

🔥2

20 May 2026, 11:19 UTC274 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Приложение которое мы разрабатывали показали у Дудя в обсуждении про инфобизнес.

😁8🔥2👎1

20 Mar 2026, 15:14 UTC274 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я искренне люблю Codex и считаю его одним из лучших инструментов. Но есть одна вещь, которая реально бесит. Иногда он просто встаёт в позу и отказывается делать совершенно обычные задачи — например, скрейпинг данных или переписать текст так, чтобы он звучал естественнее и не определялся AI написанным. Угрозы не работают, уговоры не работают, логика — тоже. Просто стена. Почему порог срабатывания такой странный — зага

3

2 Mar 2026, 11:31 UTC315 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданные конверсии ✌️ Обнаружил, что каким-то образом два пользователя продрались через мой кривой пэйвол и оформили годовую подписку на AI чат Chrome extension. Вообще, это первые покупки хотя WAU 10k пользователей. Пришлось переделать все в срочном порядке с Codex за день и довести до ума. Теперь все работает гораздо стабильнее и интерфейс на основных языках. Завтра уйдет в публикацию и буду смотреть на резуль

🔥5👎1👏1

25 Feb 2026, 19:17 UTC292 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Буквально на днях выпускаем новое приложение. Оживляем ваши фотки в популярные танцы.

🔥8👏4👎31👍1🤯1

8 Feb 2026, 17:16 UTC430 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Только что проверили своё старое AI-приложение чат и с удивлением обнаружили, что в январе у него было 2 000 органических установок с хорошими ключевыми словами, и это несмотря на плохой функционал, пейволл и слабые скриншоты. 🤩 Значит, у него есть огромный и довольно лёгкий потенциал для улучшения.

👍13😁65👎4🤯4

3 Feb 2026, 10:52 UTC445 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Автоматизация полным ходом Создал улетный плагин для Figma, чтобы автоматически переводить картинки приложения для AppStore на десятки языков сохраняя изначальный дизайн. Учел множество моментов: ✅ Воспринимает несколько текстов в группе как одно предложение, тем самым возможно выделять разные части разным стилем шрифта. ✅ Проверка скринов на требуемый в AppStore размер. ✅ Краткое описание приложения отправляется

🔥13😁12👍9👏6👎5

30 Jan 2026, 12:32 UTC564 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👋Итог 2025 За 2025 вырулили из кризиса по нашей студии. И кажется, нащупали новый очень хороший канал продаж, будем масштабировать в этом году. Значительно перестроили команду, часть разработчиков ушли, появилось больше сильных разработчиков, в которых я уверен на все 100%. Стало больше иностранных заказов из других направлений. По собственным приложениям: Создали 5 приложений. Пока прогресс не супер, добежали до о

🔥10🤯10👏76👍6

5 Sept 2025, 08:49 UTC≈1,500 views71 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🚀 Мы тут сделали новое приложение Fitly — это как виртуальная примерочная, только без очередей и заморочек. Загружаешь фотку — и бац, на тебе уже новый лук, стиль или даже старый халат 😎 👗 Хочешь проверить, пойдёт ли тебе стритстайл? 🕶 Или примерить костюм, в котором можно на свиданку? ✨ Fitly всё это покажет за секунду. Короче, выбираешь — и смотришь, как ты выглядишь в новом стиле. Залетайте, тестите, делитесь о

18👍17👎13🔥12🤯11

18 Aug 2025, 10:15 UTC720 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍15🤯1312😁10👏9

18 Aug 2025, 10:03 UTC≈1,030 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет. Мы запустили AI Video Generator: Videofy. Под капотом у нас хайповая модель Veo 3 от Google, которая генерирует видео с синхронным аудио — эффектно и реалистично. Всё работает без VPN, никаких сложностей с доступом. Вирусные ролики можно делать за секунды. А если не знаете, как сформулировать идею - не беда, в приложении есть готовые промты, и, главное, встроенный ИИ, который дорабатывает твой собственны

👏20😁17👎13🔥11🤯9

13 Aug 2025, 13:34 UTC730 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Собрали за 30 мин с AI простой прототип.

13🔥12👍9👏8🤯7

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @codewords. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 99,080 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кодовое слово⚡️APPFYL.COM” (@codewords), 1,185 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codewords.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.